OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative performance of T1rho and T2 relaxation times in disc degeneration assessment. METHODS: Lumbar sagittal MRI was performed at 3 T in 52 subjects. With a spin-lock frequency of 500 Hz, T1rho was measured using a rotary echo spin-lock pulse embedded in a three-dimensional (3D) balanced fast field echo sequence. A multi-echo TSE sequence was used for T2 mapping. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn over the T1rho and T2 maps, including nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF). Eight- and five-level disc degeneration semi-quantitative grading was performed. RESULTS: For NP, T1rho and T2 decreased quadratically with disc degeneration grades and had no significant trend difference (P = 0.40). For AF, T1rho decreased linearly as the disc degenerated and had a slope of -3.02 and -4.56 for eight- and five-level gradings respectively; while the slopes for T2 values were -1.43 and -1.84 respectively, being significantly flatter than those of T1rho (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in T1rho and T2 values for both NP and AF among discs of grade 5/8 to 8/8 degeneration. CONCLUSION: T1rho is better suited for evaluating AF in degenerated disc than T2. In NP, T1rho and T2 decrease in a similar pattern following disc degeneration.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative performance of T1rho and T2 relaxation times in disc degeneration assessment. METHODS: Lumbar sagittal MRI was performed at 3 T in 52 subjects. With a spin-lock frequency of 500 Hz, T1rho was measured using a rotary echo spin-lock pulse embedded in a three-dimensional (3D) balanced fast field echo sequence. A multi-echo TSE sequence was used for T2 mapping. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn over the T1rho and T2 maps, including nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF). Eight- and five-level disc degeneration semi-quantitative grading was performed. RESULTS: For NP, T1rho and T2 decreased quadratically with disc degeneration grades and had no significant trend difference (P = 0.40). For AF, T1rho decreased linearly as the disc degenerated and had a slope of -3.02 and -4.56 for eight- and five-level gradings respectively; while the slopes for T2 values were -1.43 and -1.84 respectively, being significantly flatter than those of T1rho (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in T1rho and T2 values for both NP and AF among discs of grade 5/8 to 8/8 degeneration. CONCLUSION: T1rho is better suited for evaluating AF in degenerated disc than T2. In NP, T1rho and T2 decrease in a similar pattern following disc degeneration.
Authors: Y-X J Wang; J F Griffith; H T Ma; A W L Kwok; J C S Leung; D K W Yeung; A T Ahuja; P C Leung Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: D G Borenstein; J W O'Mara; S D Boden; W C Lauerman; A Jacobson; C Platenberg; D Schellinger; S W Wiesel Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: James F Griffith; Yi-Xiang J Wang; Gregory E Antonio; Kai Chow Choi; Alfred Yu; Anil T Ahuja; Ping Chung Leung Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Frank M Phillips; Howard An; James D Kang; Scott D Boden; James Weinstein Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2003-08-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Joshua D Auerbach; Wade Johannessen; Arijitt Borthakur; Andrew J Wheaton; Carol A Dolinskas; Richard A Balderston; Ravinder Reddy; Dawn M Elliott Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2006-03-22 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: R Menezes-Reis; C E G Salmon; C S Carvalho; G P Bonugli; C B Chung; M H Nogueira-Barbosa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-10-16 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S E Gullbrand; N R Malhotra; T P Schaer; Z Zawacki; J T Martin; J R Bendigo; A H Milby; G R Dodge; E J Vresilovic; D M Elliott; R L Mauck; L J Smith Journal: Osteoarthritis Cartilage Date: 2016-08-26 Impact factor: 6.576
Authors: Suzanne E L Detiger; Roderick M Holewijn; Roel J W Hoogendoorn; Barend J van Royen; Marco N Helder; Ferco H Berger; Joost P A Kuijer; Theo H Smit Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 3.134