Literature DB >> 22865005

Behavioral responses of native prey to disparate predators: naiveté and predator recognition.

Jennifer R Anson1, Chris R Dickman.   

Abstract

It is widely accepted that predator recognition and avoidance are important behaviors in allowing prey to mitigate the impacts of their predators. However, while prey species generally develop anti-predator behaviors through coevolution with predators, they sometimes show accelerated adoption of these behaviors under strong selection pressure from novel species. We used a field manipulation experiment to gauge the ability of the common ringtail possum (Pseudocheirus peregrinus), a semi-arboreal Australian marsupial, to recognize and respond to olfactory cues of different predator archetypes. We predicted that ringtails would display stronger anti-predator behaviors to cues of the invasive European red fox (Vulpes vulpes) in areas where fox impacts had been greatest, and to cues of the native lace monitor (Varanus varius) in areas of sympatry compared with allopatry. We found that ringtails fled quickly and were more alert when exposed to the fecal odors of both predators compared to neutral and pungent control odors, confirming that predator odors are recognized and avoided. However, these aversive responses were similar irrespective of predator presence or level of impact. These results suggest that selection pressure from the fox has been sufficient for ringtails to develop anti-predator behaviors over the few generations since foxes have become established. In contrast, we speculate that aversive responses by ringtails to the lace monitor in areas where this predator is absent reflect recent coexistence of the two species. We conclude that rapid evolution of anti-predator behaviors may occur when selection is strong. The maintenance of these behaviors should allow re-establishment of predator-prey relationships if the interactants regain sympatry via range shifts or management actions to reintroduce them to their former ranges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22865005     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-012-2424-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  Ecological meltdown in predator-free forest fragments.

Authors:  J Terborgh; L Lopez; P Nuñez; M Rao; G Shahabuddin; G Orihuela; M Riveros; R Ascanio; G H Adler; T D Lambert; L Balbas
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Recolonizing carnivores and naïve prey: conservation lessons from Pleistocene extinctions.

Authors:  J Berger; J E Swenson; I L Persson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The loss of anti-predator behaviour following isolation on islands.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Janice C Daniel
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Sedentary snakes and gullible geckos: predator-prey coevolution in nocturnal rock-dwelling reptiles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 2.844

5.  An invasive species induces rapid adaptive change in a native predator: cane toads and black snakes in Australia.

Authors:  Ben L Phillips; Richard Shine
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Complex interactions among mammalian carnivores in Australia, and their implications for wildlife management.

Authors:  Alistair S Glen; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2005-08

7.  Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation.

Authors:  Eszter Krasznai Kovacs; Mathew S Crowther; Jonathan K Webb; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations.

Authors:  Pälvi Salo; Erkki Korpimäki; Peter B Banks; Mikael Nordström; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Behavioral and physiological adjustments to new predators in an endemic island species, the Galápagos marine iguana.

Authors:  Silke Berger; Martin Wikelski; L Michael Romero; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Thomas Rödl
Journal:  Horm Behav       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.587

10.  Introduced mammalian predators induce behavioural changes in parental care in an endemic New Zealand bird.

Authors:  Melanie Massaro; Amanda Starling-Windhof; James V Briskie; Thomas E Martin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  The control of defecation in humans: an evolutionary advantage?

Authors:  G Bassotti; V Villanacci
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Top predators affect the composition of naive protist communities, but only in their early-successional stage.

Authors:  Axel Zander; Dominique Gravel; Louis-Félix Bersier; Sarah M Gray
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Naïve prey exhibit reduced antipredator behavior and survivorship.

Authors:  Charles W Martin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Odour-mediated Interactions Between an Apex Reptilian Predator and its Mammalian Prey.

Authors:  Christopher R Dickman; Loren L Fardell; Nicole Hills
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.793

Review 5.  Restoring vertebrate predator populations can provide landscape-scale biological control of established invasive vertebrates: Insights from pine marten recovery in Europe.

Authors:  Joshua P Twining; Colin Lawton; Andy White; Emma Sheehy; Keziah Hobson; W Ian Montgomery; Xavier Lambin
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 13.211

6.  Stress triangle: do introduced predators exert indirect costs on native predators and prey?

Authors:  Jennifer R Anson; Chris R Dickman; Rudy Boonstra; Tim S Jessop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?

Authors:  Raimund Apfelbach; Michael H Parsons; Helena A Soini; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Risky business: do native rodents use habitat and odor cues to manage predation risk in Australian deserts?

Authors:  Emma E Spencer; Mathew S Crowther; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Harnessing natural selection to tackle the problem of prey naïveté.

Authors:  Katherine E Moseby; Daniel T Blumstein; Mike Letnic
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.183

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.