Literature DB >> 22042524

Population and behavioural responses of native prey to alien predation.

Eszter Krasznai Kovacs1, Mathew S Crowther, Jonathan K Webb, Christopher R Dickman.   

Abstract

The introduction of invasive alien predators often has catastrophic effects on populations of naïve native prey, but in situations where prey survive the initial impact a predator may act as a strong selective agent for prey that can discriminate and avoid it. Using two common species of Australian small mammals that have persisted in the presence of an alien predator, the European red fox Vulpes vulpes, for over a century, we hypothesised that populations of both would perform better where the activity of the predator was low than where it was high and that prey individuals would avoid signs of the predator's presence. We found no difference in prey abundance in sites with high and low fox activity, but survival of one species-the bush rat Rattus fuscipes-was almost twofold higher where fox activity was low. Juvenile, but not adult rats, avoided fox odour on traps, as did individuals of the second prey species, the brown antechinus, Antechinus stuartii. Both species also showed reduced activity at foraging trays bearing fox odour in giving-up density (GUD) experiments, although GUDs and avoidance of fox odour declined over time. Young rats avoided fox odour more strongly where fox activity was high than where it was low, but neither adult R. fuscipes nor A. stuartii responded differently to different levels of fox activity. Conservation managers often attempt to eliminate alien predators or to protect predator-naïve prey in protected reserves. Our results suggest that, if predator pressure can be reduced, otherwise susceptible prey may survive the initial impact of an alien predator, and experience selection to discriminate cues to its presence and avoid it over the longer term. Although predator reduction is often feasible, identifying the level of reduction that will conserve prey and allow selection for avoidance remains an important challenge.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22042524     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-011-2168-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

1.  The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta-analysis of Field Experiments.

Authors:  Jessica Gurevitch; Janet A Morrison; Larry V Hedges
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 2.  The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies.

Authors:  Raimund Apfelbach; Caroline D Blanchard; Robert J Blanchard; R Andrew Hayes; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-08-08       Impact factor: 8.989

Review 3.  Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators.

Authors:  Jonathan G Cox; Steven L Lima
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Alien predation and the effects of multiple levels of prey naiveté.

Authors:  Peter B Banks; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 5.  TMT-induced autonomic and behavioral changes and the neural basis of its processing.

Authors:  Markus Fendt; Thomas Endres; Catherine A Lowry; Raimund Apfelbach; Iain S McGregor
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2005-08-15       Impact factor: 8.989

6.  The predator odor, TMT, displays a unique, stress-like pattern of dopaminergic and endocrinological activation in the rat.

Authors:  B A Morrow; A J Redmond; R H Roth; J D Elsworth
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2000-05-02       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Predator functional response and prey survival: direct and indirect interactions affecting a marked prey population.

Authors:  David A Miller; James B Grand; Thomas F Fondell; Michael Anthony
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.091

8.  Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations.

Authors:  Pälvi Salo; Erkki Korpimäki; Peter B Banks; Mikael Nordström; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

  8 in total
  13 in total

1.  Personality affects the foraging response of a mammalian herbivore to the dual costs of food and fear.

Authors:  Valentina S A Mella; Ashley J W Ward; Peter B Banks; Clare McArthur
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Behavioral responses of native prey to disparate predators: naiveté and predator recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer R Anson; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Naïve prey exhibit reduced antipredator behavior and survivorship.

Authors:  Charles W Martin
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  From tameness to wariness: chemical recognition of snake predators by lizards in a Mediterranean island.

Authors:  Abraham Mencía; Zaida Ortega; Valentín Pérez-Mellado
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Invasive crayfish does not influence spawning microhabitat selection of brown frogs.

Authors:  Samuele Romagnoli; Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Raoul Manenti
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Patterns of detection and capture are associated with cohabiting predators and prey.

Authors:  Billie T Lazenby; Christopher R Dickman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Stress triangle: do introduced predators exert indirect costs on native predators and prey?

Authors:  Jennifer R Anson; Chris R Dickman; Rudy Boonstra; Tim S Jessop
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Could direct killing by larger dingoes have caused the extinction of the thylacine from mainland Australia?

Authors:  Mike Letnic; Melanie Fillios; Mathew S Crowther
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Are single odorous components of a predator sufficient to elicit defensive behaviors in prey species?

Authors:  Raimund Apfelbach; Michael H Parsons; Helena A Soini; Milos V Novotny
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Wild Norway Rats Do Not Avoid Predator Scents When Collecting Food in a Familiar Habitat: A Field Study.

Authors:  Rafał Stryjek; Berenika Mioduszewska; Ewelina Spaltabaka-Gędek; Grzegorz R Juszczak
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.