Literature DB >> 26501772

Top predators affect the composition of naive protist communities, but only in their early-successional stage.

Axel Zander, Dominique Gravel, Louis-Félix Bersier, Sarah M Gray.   

Abstract

Introduced top predators have the potential to disrupt community dynamics when prey species are naive to predation. The impact of introduced predators may also vary depending on the stage of community development. Early-succession communities are likely to have small-bodied and fast-growing species, but are not necessarily good at defending against predators. In contrast, late-succession communities are typically composed of larger-bodied species that are more predator resistant relative to small-bodied species. Yet, these aspects are greatly neglected in invasion studies. We therefore tested the effect of top predator presence on early- and late-succession communities that were either naive or non-naive to top predators. We used the aquatic community held within the leaves of Sarracenia purpurea. In North America, communities have experienced the S. purpurea top predator and are therefore non-naive. In Europe, this predator is not present and its niche has not been filled, making these communities top-predator naive. We collected early- and late-succession communities from two non-naive and two naive sites, which are climatically similar. We then conducted a common-garden experiment, with and without the presence of the top predator, in which we recorded changes in community composition, body size spectra, bacterial density, and respiration. We found that the top predator had no statistical effect on global measures of community structure and functioning. However, it significantly altered protist composition, but only in naive, early-succession communities, highlighting that the state of community development is important for understanding the impact of invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26501772     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-015-3476-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  24 in total

Review 1.  Long-term studies of vegetation dynamics.

Authors:  M Rees; R Condit; M Crawley; S Pacala; D Tilman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-07-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Turning up the heat: temperature influences the relative importance of top-down and bottom-up effects.

Authors:  David Hoekman
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 3.  Naiveté and an aquatic-terrestrial dichotomy in the effects of introduced predators.

Authors:  Jonathan G Cox; Steven L Lima
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Alternative community compositional and dynamical states: the dual consequences of assembly history.

Authors:  Lin Jiang; Hena Joshi; Sooyung K Flakes; Yeonjin Jung
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  The strategy of ecosystem development.

Authors:  E P Odum
Journal:  Science       Date:  1969-04-18       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Divergent induced responses to an invasive predator in marine mussel populations.

Authors:  Aaren S Freeman; James E Byers
Journal:  Science       Date:  2006-08-11       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Alien predators are more dangerous than native predators to prey populations.

Authors:  Pälvi Salo; Erkki Korpimäki; Peter B Banks; Mikael Nordström; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Behavioral responses of native prey to disparate predators: naiveté and predator recognition.

Authors:  Jennifer R Anson; Chris R Dickman
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Genetic variability and founder effect in the pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea (Sarraceniaceae) in populations introduced into Switzerland: from inbreeding to invasion.

Authors:  Christian Parisod; Charlotte Trippi; Nicole Galland
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 4.357

10.  Are trade-offs among species' ecological interactions scale dependent? A test using pitcher-plant inquiline species.

Authors:  Jamie M Kneitel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Convergence between the microcosms of Southeast Asian and North American pitcher plants.

Authors:  Leonora S Bittleston; Charles J Wolock; Bakhtiar E Yahya; Xin Yue Chan; Kok Gan Chan; Naomi E Pierce; Anne Pringle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Mismatch in microbial food webs: predators but not prey perform better in their local biotic and abiotic conditions.

Authors:  Elodie C Parain; Dominique Gravel; Rudolf P Rohr; Louis-Félix Bersier; Sarah M Gray
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  The effects of temperature and dispersal on species diversity in natural microbial metacommunities.

Authors:  Elodie C Parain; Sarah M Gray; Louis-Félix Bersier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.