Literature DB >> 22863792

Seeing steps and ramps with simulated low acuity: impact of texture and locomotion.

Tiana M Bochsler1, Gordon E Legge, Christopher S Kallie, Rachel Gage.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Detecting and recognizing steps and ramps is an important component of the visual accessibility of public spaces for people with impaired vision. The present study, which is part of a larger program of research on visual accessibility, investigated the impact of two factors that may facilitate the recognition of steps and ramps during low-acuity viewing. Visual texture on the ground plane is an environmental factor that improves judgments of surface distance and slant. Locomotion (walking) is common during observations of a layout, and may generate visual motion cues that enhance the recognition of steps and ramps.
METHODS: In two experiments, normally sighted subjects viewed the targets monocularly through blur goggles that reduced acuity to either approximately 20/150 (mild blur) or 20/880 Snellen (severe blur). The subjects judged whether a step, ramp, or neither was present ahead on a sidewalk. In the texture experiment, subjects viewed steps and ramps on a surface with a coarse black-and-white checkerboard pattern. In the locomotion experiment, subjects walked along the sidewalk toward the target before making judgments.
RESULTS: Surprisingly, performance was lower with the textured surface than with a uniform surface, perhaps because the texture masked visual cues necessary for target recognition. Subjects performed better in walking trials than in stationary trials, possibly because they were able to take advantage of visual cues that were only present during motion.
CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that under conditions of simulated low acuity, large high-contrast texture elements can hinder the recognition of steps and ramps, whereas locomotion enhances recognition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22863792      PMCID: PMC3454499          DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318264f2bd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  17 in total

1.  Self-motion and the perception of stationary objects.

Authors:  M Wexler; F Panerai; I Lamouret; J Droulez
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2001-01-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Judging distance across texture discontinuities.

Authors:  Cary S Feria; Myron L Braunstein; George J Andersen
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Perceiving distance accurately by a directional process of integrating ground information.

Authors:  Bing Wu; Teng Leng Ooi; Zijiang J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Stereopsis and contrast.

Authors:  G E Legge; Y C Gu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Terrain influences the accurate judgement of distance.

Authors:  M J Sinai; T L Ooi; Z J He
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast.

Authors:  S P McKee; G H Silverman; K Nakayama
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Relative motion: kinetic information for the order of depth at an edge.

Authors:  A Yonas; L G Craton; W B Thompson
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-01

8.  Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: temporal and spatial properties.

Authors:  G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Different aspects of visual impairment as risk factors for falls and fractures in older men and women.

Authors:  Michiel R de Boer; Saskia M F Pluijm; Paul Lips; Annette C Moll; Hennie J Völker-Dieben; Dorly J H Deeg; Ger H M B van Rens
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2004-05-10       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Visual depth illusion and falls in the elderly.

Authors:  T E Cohn; D J Lasley
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 3.076

View more
  17 in total

1.  Recognition of ramps and steps by people with low vision.

Authors:  Tiana M Bochsler; Gordon E Legge; Rachel Gage; Christopher S Kallie
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Let me be your guide: physical guidance improves spatial learning for older adults with simulated low vision.

Authors:  Erica M Barhorst-Cates; Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Information for perceiving blurry events: Optic flow and color are additive.

Authors:  Hongge Xu; Jing Samantha Pan; Xiaoye Michael Wang; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Gaze behavior during navigation with reduced acuity.

Authors:  Andrew Freedman; Jacob Achtemeier; Yihwa Baek; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.467

5.  Spatial learning while navigating with severely degraded viewing: The role of attention and mobility monitoring.

Authors:  Kristina M Rand; Sarah H Creem-Regehr; William B Thompson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  New challenges in low-vision research.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Ian L Bailey; Gislin Dagnelie; Jonathan A Jackson; Gordon E Legge; Gary S Rubin; Joanne Wood
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Identification and detection of simple 3D objects with severely blurred vision.

Authors:  Christopher S Kallie; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-12-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 8.  Prentice medal lecture 2013: visual accessibility: a challenge for low-vision research.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Investigating the Influence of Visual Function and Systemic Risk Factors on Falls and Injurious Falls in Glaucoma Using the Structural Equation Modeling.

Authors:  Kenya Yuki; Ryo Asaoka; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Indoor Spatial Updating with Reduced Visual Information.

Authors:  Gordon E Legge; Rachel Gage; Yihwa Baek; Tiana M Bochsler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.