Literature DB >> 3739236

Precise velocity discrimination despite random variations in temporal frequency and contrast.

S P McKee, G H Silverman, K Nakayama.   

Abstract

Velocity discrimination is not affected by random changes in contrast or temporal frequency. Observers judged the relative velocity of a moving sinusoidal grating when target contrast was varied randomly from trial-to-trial over the range from 5 to 82%. The Weber fraction for the random mixture of interspersed contrast levels was about 0.06, comparable to velocity discrimination for targets presented at a fixed contrast. In a parallel experiment, the spatial frequency of the target was changed randomly from trial-to-trial, a procedure which produced concomitant random changes in the nominal temporal frequency. These variations had little effect on the velocity increment threshold; random changes in temporal frequency ranging from 2.25 to 8.25 Hz increased the Weber fraction from 0.05 to 0.07. Under identical experimental conditions, velocity discrimination was generally more precise than the discrimination of differences in temporal frequency, particularly when temporal frequency thresholds were measured with counterphase gratings. Our results indicate that velocity discrimination depends on velocity.

Mesh:

Year:  1986        PMID: 3739236     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90009-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  39 in total

1.  Properties of the recombination of one-dimensional motion signals into a pattern motion signal.

Authors:  F L Kooi; K K De Valois; D H Grosof; R L De Valois
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1992-10

2.  A self-organising neural network model of image velocity encoding.

Authors:  K N Gurney; M J Wright
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.086

3.  The relationship between task performance and functional magnetic resonance imaging response.

Authors:  Giedrius T Buracas; Ione Fine; Geoffrey M Boynton
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Two distinct visual motion mechanisms for smooth pursuit: evidence from individual differences.

Authors:  Jeremy B Wilmer; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-06-21       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  A biologically plausible model of early visual motion processing. II: psychophysical application.

Authors:  K Gurney; M J Wright
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 6.  Abnormal visual motion processing in schizophrenia: a review of research progress.

Authors:  Y Chen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 9.306

7.  Detection and discrimination of first- and second-order motion in patients with unilateral brain damage.

Authors:  M W Greenlee; A T Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of early visual pathways in dyslexia.

Authors:  J B Demb; G M Boynton; D J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Apparent speed increases at low luminance.

Authors:  Maryam Vaziri-Pashkam; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  Separating the contributions of primary and unwanted cues in psychophysical studies.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 8.934

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.