Literature DB >> 22851648

Indirect genetic effects for survival in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) are magnified in crossbred genotypes and show a parent-of-origin effect.

K Peeters1, T T Eppink, E D Ellen, J Visscher, P Bijma.   

Abstract

Through social interactions, individuals can affect one another's phenotype. The heritable effect of an individual on the phenotype of a conspecific is known as an indirect genetic effect (IGE). Although IGEs can have a substantial impact on heritable variation and response to selection, little is known about the genetic architecture of traits affected by IGEs. We studied IGEs for survival in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus), using data on two purebred lines and their reciprocal cross. Birds were kept in groups of four. Feather pecking and cannibalism caused mortality, as beaks were kept intact. Survival time was shorter in crossbreds than in purebreds, indicating outbreeding depression and the presence of nonadditive genetic effects. IGEs contributed the majority of heritable variation in crossbreds (87 and 72%) and around half of heritable variation in purebreds (65 and 44%). There was no evidence of dominance variance, neither direct nor indirect. Absence of dominance variance in combination with considerable outbreeding depression suggests that survival is affected by many loci. Direct-indirect genetic correlations were moderately to highly negative in crossbreds (-0.37 ± 0.17 and -0.83 ± 0.10), but low and not significantly different from zero in purebreds (0.20 ± 0.21 and -0.28 ± 0.18). Consequently, unlike purebreds, crossbreds would fail to respond positively to mass selection. The direct genetic correlation between both crosses was high (0.95 ± 0.23), whereas the indirect genetic correlation was moderate (0.41 ± 0.26). Thus, for IGEs, it mattered which parental line provided the sire and which provided the dam. This indirect parent-of-origin effect appeared to be paternally transmitted and is probably Z chromosome linked.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22851648      PMCID: PMC3454891          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.112.142554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  38 in total

Review 1.  Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome.

Authors:  W Reik; J Walter
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 53.242

2.  All of life is social.

Authors:  Steven A Frank
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

3.  Genetic effects of aging on fitness and nonfitness traits in laying hens housed three per cage.

Authors:  M C Ledur; L E Liljedahl; I McMillan; L Asselstine; R W Fairfull
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Across-line SNP association study for direct and associative effects on feather damage in laying hens.

Authors:  F Biscarini; H Bovenhuis; J van der Poel; T B Rodenburg; A P Jungerius; J A M van Arendonk
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 2.805

5.  Feather pecking in chickens is genetically related to behavioural and developmental traits.

Authors:  P Jensen; L Keeling; K Schütz; L Andersson; P Mormède; H Brändström; B Forkman; S Kerje; R Fredriksson; C Ohlsson; S Larsson; H Mallmin; A Kindmark
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2005-09-15

6.  Selection in reference to biological groups. I. Individual and group selection applied to populations of unordered groups.

Authors:  B Griffing
Journal:  Aust J Biol Sci       Date:  1967-02

7.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Genetic and phenotypic parameters for 305-day yield, fertility, and survival in Holsteins.

Authors:  C M Dematawewa; P J Berger
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Genetic parameters for social effects on survival in cannibalistic layers: combining survival analysis and a linear animal model.

Authors:  Esther D Ellen; Vincent Ducrocq; Bart J Ducro; Roel F Veerkamp; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Sex chromosome complement and gonadal sex influence aggressive and parental behaviors in mice.

Authors:  Jessica D Gatewood; Aileen Wills; Savera Shetty; Jun Xu; Arthur P Arnold; Paul S Burgoyne; Emilie F Rissman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  21 in total

Review 1.  The quantitative genetics of indirect genetic effects: a selective review of modelling issues.

Authors:  P Bijma
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Cascading indirect genetic effects in a clonal vertebrate.

Authors:  Amber M Makowicz; David Bierbach; Christian Richardson; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 5.530

3.  Fast growing broiler production from genetically different pure lines in Turkey. 1. Parental traits: growth, feed intake, reproduction, and hatching traits.

Authors:  Kadir Erensoy; Musa Sarıca
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 1.893

4.  Indirect Genetic Effects: A Cross-disciplinary Perspective on Empirical Studies.

Authors:  Amelie Baud; Sarah McPeek; Nancy Chen; Kimberly A Hughes
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 2.679

5.  Genetic-based interactions among tree neighbors: identification of the most influential neighbors, and estimation of correlations among direct and indirect genetic effects for leaf disease and growth in Eucalyptus globulus.

Authors:  J Costa E Silva; B M Potts; A R Gilmour; R J Kerr
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Using pooled data to estimate variance components and breeding values for traits affected by social interactions.

Authors:  Katrijn Peeters; Esther Dorien Ellen; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Indirect genetic effects and housing conditions in relation to aggressive behaviour in pigs.

Authors:  Irene Camerlink; Simon P Turner; Piter Bijma; J Elizabeth Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting direct and indirect breeding values for survival time in laying hens using repeated measures.

Authors:  Tessa Brinker; Esther D Ellen; Roel F Veerkamp; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Direct and social genetic parameters for growth and fin damage traits in Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua).

Authors:  Hanne M Nielsen; Brage B Monsen; Jørgen Odegård; Piter Bijma; Børge Damsgård; Hilde Toften; Ingrid Olesen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-01-24       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Plumage condition in laying hens: genetic parameters for direct and indirect effects in two purebred layer lines.

Authors:  Tessa Brinker; Piter Bijma; Jeroen Visscher; T Bas Rodenburg; Esther D Ellen
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.