Literature DB >> 16098546

Feather pecking in chickens is genetically related to behavioural and developmental traits.

P Jensen1, L Keeling, K Schütz, L Andersson, P Mormède, H Brändström, B Forkman, S Kerje, R Fredriksson, C Ohlsson, S Larsson, H Mallmin, A Kindmark.   

Abstract

Feather pecking (FP) is a detrimental behaviour in chickens, which is performed by only some individuals in a flock. FP was studied in 54 red junglefowl (ancestor of domestic chickens), 36 White Leghorn laying hens, and 762 birds from an F(2)-intercross between these two lines. From all F(2)-birds, growth and feed consumption were measured. Age at sexual maturity and egg production in females, and corticosterone levels in males were also measured. From 333 F(2)-birds of both sexes, and 20 parental birds, body composition with respect to bone mineral content, muscle and fat was obtained by post-mortem examinations using Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA). In femurs of the same birds, the bone density and structure were analysed using DXA and Peripheral Quantitative Computerized Tomography (pQCT), and a biomechanical analysis of bone strength was performed. Furthermore, plumage condition was determined in all birds as a measure of being exposed to feather pecking. Using 105 DNA-markers in all F(2)-birds, a genome-wide scan for Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL), associated with the behaviour in the F(2)-generation was performed. FP was at least as frequent in the red junglefowl as in the White Leghorn strain studied here, and significantly more common among females both in the parental strains and in the F(2)-generation. In the F(2)-birds, FP was phenotypically linked to early sexual maturation, fast growth, weak bones, and, in males, also high fat accumulation, indicating that feather peckers have a different resource allocation pattern. Behaviourally, F(2) feather peckers were more active in an open field test, in a novel food/novel object test, and in a restraint test, indicating that feather pecking might be genetically linked to a proactive coping strategy. Only one suggestive QTL with a low explanatory value was found on chromosome 3, showing that many genes, each with a small effect, are probably involved in the causation of feather pecking. There were significant effects of sire and dam on the risk of being a victim of feather pecking, and victims grew faster pre- and post-hatching, had lower corticosterone levels and were less active in a restraint test. Hence, a wide array of behavioural and developmental traits were genetically linked to FP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16098546     DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2005.06.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  14 in total

1.  Differences in gut microbiota composition of laying hen lines divergently selected on feather pecking.

Authors:  Jerine A J van der Eijk; Hugo de Vries; Joergen B Kjaer; Marc Naguib; Bas Kemp; Hauke Smidt; T Bas Rodenburg; Aart Lammers
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Identification of chromosomal locations associated with tail biting and being a victim of tail-biting behaviour in the domestic pig (Sus scrofa domesticus).

Authors:  Kaitlin Wilson; Ricardo Zanella; Carlos Ventura; Hanne Lind Johansen; Tore Framstad; Andrew Janczak; Adroaldo J Zanella; Holly Louise Neibergs
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2012-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Indirect genetic effects for survival in domestic chickens (Gallus gallus) are magnified in crossbred genotypes and show a parent-of-origin effect.

Authors:  K Peeters; T T Eppink; E D Ellen; J Visscher; P Bijma
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Pecking Behavior in Conventional Layer Hybrids and Dual-Purpose Hens Throughout the Laying Period.

Authors:  Lorena Rieke; Birgit Spindler; Isabel Zylka; Nicole Kemper; Mona Franziska Giersberg
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-23

5.  A medium density genetic map and QTL for behavioral and production traits in Japanese quail.

Authors:  Julien Recoquillay; Frédérique Pitel; Cécile Arnould; Sophie Leroux; Patrice Dehais; Carole Moréno; Ludovic Calandreau; Aline Bertin; David Gourichon; Olivier Bouchez; Alain Vignal; Maria Ines Fariello; Francis Minvielle; Catherine Beaumont; Christine Leterrier; Elisabeth Le Bihan-Duval
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 3.969

6.  Effects of Divergent Selection for Fear of Humans on Behaviour in Red Junglefowl.

Authors:  Beatrix Agnvall; Per Jensen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of the domestic thyroid stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) variant on the hypothalamic-pituitary-thyroid axis and behavior in chicken.

Authors:  Amir Fallahshahroudi; Martin Johnsson; Enrico Sorato; S J Kumari A Ubhayasekera; Jonas Bergquist; Jordi Altimiras; Per Jensen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Differential gene expression in femoral bone from red junglefowl and domestic chicken, differing for bone phenotypic traits.

Authors:  Carl-Johan Rubin; Johan Lindberg; Carolyn Fitzsimmons; Peter Savolainen; Per Jensen; Joakim Lundeberg; Leif Andersson; Andreas Kindmark
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2007-07-02       Impact factor: 3.969

9.  Individual Consistency of Feather Pecking Behavior in Laying Hens: Once a Feather Pecker Always a Feather Pecker?

Authors:  Courtney L Daigle; T Bas Rodenburg; J Elizabeth Bolhuis; Janice C Swanson; Janice M Siegford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2015-04-14

Review 10.  Omnivores Going Astray: A Review and New Synthesis of Abnormal Behavior in Pigs and Laying Hens.

Authors:  Emma I Brunberg; T Bas Rodenburg; Lotta Rydhmer; Joergen B Kjaer; Per Jensen; Linda J Keeling
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-07-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.