Literature DB >> 22851216

MRI-Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What's New and What Can We Expect in the Future?

Roy Beinart1, Saman Nazarian.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a diagnostic technique is rapidly expanding. The number of patients who undergo implantation of permanent pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD), and/or cardiac resynchronization therapy devices is increasing in parallel. Cardiovascular implants are subject to potentially harmful effects from MRI, and the routine use of this imaging modality for patients with standard cardiovascular devices is contraindicated. Several recent publications have suggested that MRI can safely be performed in standard cardiovascular device recipients with appropriate patient selection, device programming, and strict monitoring. In addition, MRI "conditional" device systems are now available that are specifically designed to be safe in the MRI environment. Such new technologies may simplify and improve overall safety of MRI in the setting of pacemaker and ICD systems. Although the availability of MRI conditional devices represents a significant breakthrough, their current use is limited to specific MRI conditions. MRI conditional cardiac device technology will likely continue to evolve with increased efforts to improve simplicity, safety, and generalizability under all MRI conditions.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22851216     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-012-0197-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  15 in total

1.  Modern pacemaker and implantable cardioverter/defibrillator systems can be magnetic resonance imaging safe: in vitro and in vivo assessment of safety and function at 1.5 T.

Authors:  Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Glenn R Meininger; E Rene Rodrigues; Timm M Dickfeld; David A Bluemke; Albert Lardo; Ronald D Berger; Hugh Calkins; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-26       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Unexpected pacing inhibition upon exposure to the 3T static magnetic field prior to imaging acquisition: what is the mechanism?

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 6.343

3.  Heating of pacemaker leads during magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Christian Vahlhaus
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-05-04       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment.

Authors:  Harikrishna Tandri; Menekhem M Zviman; Steven R Wedan; Thomas Lloyd; Ronald D Berger; Henry Halperin
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2007-12-27       Impact factor: 6.343

5.  A prospective evaluation of a protocol for magnetic resonance imaging of patients with implanted cardiac devices.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Rozann Hansford; Ariel Roguin; Dorith Goldsher; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Brian S Caffo; Kevin D Frick; Michael A Kraut; Ihab R Kamel; Hugh Calkins; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Clinical utility and safety of a protocol for noncardiac and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of patients with permanent pacemakers and implantable-cardioverter defibrillators at 1.5 tesla.

Authors:  Saman Nazarian; Ariel Roguin; Menekhem M Zviman; Albert C Lardo; Timm L Dickfeld; Hugh Calkins; Robert G Weiss; Ronald D Berger; David A Bluemke; Henry R Halperin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Strategy for safe performance of extrathoracic magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 tesla in the presence of cardiac pacemakers in non-pacemaker-dependent patients: a prospective study with 115 examinations.

Authors:  Torsten Sommer; Claas P Naehle; Alexander Yang; Volkert Zeijlemaker; Matthias Hackenbroch; Alexandra Schmiedel; Carsten Meyer; Katharina Strach; Dirk Skowasch; Christian Vahlhaus; Harold Litt; Hans Schild
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Current clinical issues for MRI scanning of pacemaker and defibrillator patients.

Authors:  Ron Kalin; Marshall S Stanton
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.976

9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with a pacemaker system designed for the magnetic resonance environment.

Authors:  Bruce L Wilkoff; David Bello; Milos Taborsky; Josef Vymazal; Emanuel Kanal; Hubertus Heuer; Katrin Hecking; W Ben Johnson; William Young; Brian Ramza; Naveed Akhtar; Bernhard Kuepper; Peter Hunold; Roger Luechinger; Helmut Puererfellner; Firat Duru; M J W Gotte; Richard Sutton; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 6.343

10.  Unexpected asystole during 3T magnetic resonance imaging of a pacemaker-dependent patient with a 'modern' pacemaker.

Authors:  J Rod Gimbel
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 5.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.