Literature DB >> 18313607

Determinants of gradient field-induced current in a pacemaker lead system in a magnetic resonance imaging environment.

Harikrishna Tandri1, Menekhem M Zviman, Steven R Wedan, Thomas Lloyd, Ronald D Berger, Henry Halperin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The determinants of low-frequency-induced current by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) gradient fields in a pacemaker lead system are largely unknown.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of MRI low-frequency-induced current in an implanted pacemaker lead system and to investigate in vivo determinants of low-frequency-induced current in an animal model.
METHODS: Six mongrel dogs underwent conventional single-chamber pacemaker implantation with a current recorder connected in series. Pulse generator (PG) was programmed to VOO 120 bpm with subthreshold output. MRI was performed in a 1.5-T scanner. Low-frequency-induced current was recorded during unipolar pacing, bipolar pacing, and bipolar pacing with the PG case electrically isolated from the pocket. In each mode, low-frequency-induced current was recorded with and without a large loop of additional lead connected in series.
RESULTS: With a conventional implant, low-frequency-induced current was < or =0.5 mA in all three pacing modes. With five external loops, the magnitude of low-frequency-induced current increased to >30 mA, with consistent myocardial capture in unipolar and bipolar pacing. However, in bipolar pacing with the PG electrically isolated from the pocket, low-frequency-induced current decreased to <0.5 mA with no myocardial capture even with additional looped leads.
CONCLUSION: Under conventional implant conditions, the magnitude of low-frequency-induced current is <0.5 mA and is unlikely to cause myocardial capture; however, arrhythmia induction cannot be excluded. With sufficient increase in effective loop area (additional looped leads), direct myocardial capture by the low-frequency-induced current is possible. In this study, breaking the return pathway by electrically isolating the PG case from the circuit abolished low-frequency-induced current.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18313607     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  16 in total

1.  Acute and chronic high-frequency properties of cardiac pacing and defibrillation leads.

Authors:  Danko Tomasic; Bozidar Ferek-Petric; Sandro Brusich; Agostino P Accardo
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 2.  [MR safety assessment of active implanted medical devices. German version].

Authors:  Sarra Aissani; Elmar Laistler; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 3.  MR safety assessment of active implantable medical devices.

Authors:  Sarra Aissani; Elmar Laistler; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  An optically coupled sensor for the measurement of currents induced by MRI gradient fields into endocardial leads.

Authors:  Eugenio Mattei; Federica Censi; Michele Triventi; Antonio Napolitano; Elisabetta Genovese; Vittorio Cannatà; Giovanni Calcagnini
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  A novel MR-compatible sensor to assess active medical device safety: stimulation monitoring, rectified radio frequency pulses, and gradient-induced voltage measurements.

Authors:  Thérèse Barbier; Sarra Aissani; Nicolas Weber; Cédric Pasquier; Jacques Felblinger
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  MRI of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices.

Authors:  Jessica A Martinez; Daniel B Ennis
Journal:  Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep       Date:  2019-05-27

7.  In-vitro mapping of E-fields induced near pacemaker leads by simulated MR gradient fields.

Authors:  Howard I Bassen; Gonzalo G Mendoza
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  MRI-Conditional Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: What's New and What Can We Expect in the Future?

Authors:  Roy Beinart; Saman Nazarian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2012-10

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: era of "MR Conditional" designs.

Authors:  Jerold S Shinbane; Patrick M Colletti; Frank G Shellock
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Magnetic resonance imaging conditional pacemakers: rationale, development and future directions.

Authors:  Edmond M Cronin; Bruce L Wilkoff
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2012-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.