Literature DB >> 22849495

Protective ileostomy: complications and mortality associated with its closure.

Mónica Mengual-Ballester1, José Andrés García-Marín, Enrique Pellicer-Franco, María Pilar Guillén-Paredes, María Luisa García-García, María José Cases-Baldó, José Luis Aguayo-Albasini.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: diverting loop ileostomies are widely used in colorectal surgery to protect low rectal anastomoses. However, they may have various complications, among which are those associated with the subsequent stoma closure. The present study analyses our experience in a series of patients undergoing closure of loop ileostomies.
METHOD: retrospective study of all the patients undergoing ileostomy closure at our hospital between 2006-2010. There were 89 patients: 56 males (63%) and 33 females (37%) with a mean age of 55 (38-71) years. The most common indication for ileostomy was protection of a low rectal anastomosis, 81 patients (91%). The waiting time until stoma closure, type and frequency of the complications, length of hospital stay and mortality rate are analysed.
RESULTS: waiting time before surgery was 8 (1-25) months. Forty-one patients (45,9%) developed some type of complication, three were reoperated (3.37%) and one patient died (1.12%). The most important complications were intestinal obstruction (32.6%), diarrhoea(6%), surgical wound infection (6%), enterocutaneous fistula (4.5%), rectorrhagia (3.4%) and anastomotic leak (1.12%). The mean length of patient stay was 7.54 (2-23) days.
CONCLUSIONS: protective ostomies in low rectal anastomoses have proved to be the only preventive measure for reducing the morbidity and mortality rates for anastomotic leakage. However, creation means subsequent closure, which must not be considered a minor procedure but an operation with possibly significant complications, including death, as has been shown in publications on the subject and in our own series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22849495     DOI: 10.4321/s1130-01082012000700003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Enferm Dig        ISSN: 1130-0108            Impact factor:   2.086


  14 in total

Review 1.  Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irshad Shaikh; Alan Askari; Suzana Ourû; Janindra Warusavitarne; Thanos Athanasiou; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Technical Considerations in Stoma Creation.

Authors:  Alia Whitehead; Peter A Cataldo
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2017-05-22

3.  The Reversal of Stoma Following Open Abdomen Management.

Authors:  Fahri Yetişir; AkgünEbru Şarer; H Zafer Acar; Erdinç Çiftciler
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2015-09-05       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Increased postoperative complications after protective ileostomy closure delay: An institutional study.

Authors:  Ines Rubio-Perez; Miguel Leon; Daniel Pastor; Joaquin Diaz Dominguez; Ramon Cantero
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-09-27

5.  Ileostomy reversal with handsewn techniques. Short-term outcomes in a teaching hospital.

Authors:  Gaetano Luglio; Francesco Terracciano; Mariano Cesare Giglio; Michele Sacco; Roberto Peltrini; Viviana Sollazzo; Emanuela Spadarella; Cristina Bucci; Giovanni Domenico De Palma; Luigi Bucci
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Risk factors for postoperative ileus following loop ileostomy closure.

Authors:  Aydın Aktaş; Cüneyt Kayaalp; Mustafa Ateş; Abuzer Dirican
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2020-12-29

7.  Retrorectus mesh reinforcement of ileostomy site fascial closure: stoma closure and reinforcement (SCAR) trial phase I/II results.

Authors:  R D Shaw; J L Goldwag; L R Wilson; S J Ivatury; M J Tsapakos; E M Pauli; M Z Wilson
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 2.920

8.  The effect of a diverting stoma on morbidity and risk of permanent stoma following anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Nis Hallundbæk Schlesinger; Henry Smith
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-06-14       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Comparing methods of ileostomy closure constructed in colorectal surgery in Turkey.

Authors:  Bulent Dinc; Nurettin Ay; Huseyin Ciyiltepe
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-19

10.  Risk Factors of Delayed Recovery of Gastrointestinal Function After Ileostomy Reversal for Rectal Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Lili Chu; Hui Wang; Suyu Qiu; Biyan Shao; Jia Huang; Qiyuan Qin; Yanjiong He; Jing Xue; Xiaoyan Li; Xiaoyan Huang; Rongkang Huang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.