| Literature DB >> 22844134 |
Jason C Bourret1, Brian A Iwata, Jill M Harper, Stephen T North.
Abstract
Five individuals with autism or other developmental disabilities participated in paired-stimulus preference assessments during repeated baseline probes. All subjects initially showed a pronounced bias by typically selecting the stimulus placed in either the left or right position. Biased responding for 3 subjects was eliminated when training trials were conducted in which a stimulus of known lesser quality was presented as one of the choices. Reinforcer-quality training was unsuccessful for 2 subjects, as was a condition in which reinforcer magnitude was modified to favor unbiased responding. These subjects' biased responding was eliminated only when a correction procedure (repetition of error trials) was implemented.Entities:
Keywords: directional bias; error correction; preference assessment; reinforcer magnitude; reinforcer quality; selection bias
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22844134 PMCID: PMC3405922 DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2012.45-241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Appl Behav Anal ISSN: 0021-8855