Literature DB >> 22843764

Augmented reality visualization with use of image overlay technology for MR imaging-guided interventions: assessment of performance in cadaveric shoulder and hip arthrography at 1.5 T.

Jan Fritz1, Paweena U-Thainual, Tamas Ungi, Aaron J Flammang, Gabor Fichtinger, Iulian I Iordachita, John A Carrino.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess overlay technology in providing accurate and efficient targeting for magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided shoulder and hip joint arthrography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prototype augmented reality image overlay system was used in conjunction with a clinical 1.5-T MR imager. A total of 24 shoulder joint and 24 hip joint injections were planned in 12 human cadavers. Two operators (A and B) participated, each performing procedures on different cadavers using image overlay guidance. MR imaging was used to confirm needle positions, monitor injections, and perform MR arthrography. Accuracy was assessed according to the rate of needle adjustment, target error, and whether the injection was intraarticular. Efficiency was assessed according to arthrography procedural time. Operator differences were assessed with comparison of accuracy and procedure times between the operators. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test were used to assess group differences.
RESULTS: Forty-five arthrography procedures (23 shoulders, 22 hips) were performed. Three joints had prostheses and were excluded. Operator A performed 12 shoulder and 12 hip injections. Operator B performed 11 shoulder and 10 hip injections. Needle adjustment rate was 13% (six of 45; one for operator A and five for operator B). Target error was 3.1 mm±1.2 (standard deviation) (operator A, 2.9 mm±1.4; operator B, 3.5 mm±0.9). Intraarticular injection rate was 100% (45 of 45). The average arthrography time was 14 minutes (range, 6-27 minutes; 12 minutes [range, 6-25 minutes] for operator A and 16 minutes [range, 6-27 min] for operator B). Operator differences were not significant with regard to needle adjustment rate (P=.08), target error (P=.07), intraarticular injection rate (P>.99), and arthrography time (P=.22).
CONCLUSION: Image overlay technology provides accurate and efficient MR guidance for successful shoulder and hip arthrography in human cadavers. © RSNA, 2012.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843764      PMCID: PMC3447176          DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12112640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  CT fluoroscopy--guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists.

Authors:  E K Paulson; D H Sheafor; D S Enterline; H P McAdams; T T Yoshizumi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Describing data: statistical and graphical methods.

Authors:  Seema S Sonnad
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Arthrography of the shoulder: a simple fluoroscopically guided approach for targeting the rotator cuff interval.

Authors:  Hélène Dépelteau; Nathalie J Bureau; Etienne Cardinal; Benoît Aubin; Paul Brassard
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 4.  Special focus session. MR arthrography.

Authors:  Lynne S Steinbach; William E Palmer; Mark E Schweitzer
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.333

5.  Augmented reality visualization with image overlay for MRI-guided intervention: accuracy for lumbar spinal procedures with a 1.5-T MRI system.

Authors:  Jan Fritz; Paweena U-Thainual; Tamas Ungi; Aaron J Flammang; Nathan B Cho; Gabor Fichtinger; Iulian I Iordachita; John A Carrino
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  The lateral approach for hip arthrography.

Authors:  R F Kilcoyne; P Kaplan
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Sonographic guidance of needle position for MR arthrography of the shoulder.

Authors:  R Valls; P Melloni
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. Report of a WHO consultation.

Authors: 
Journal:  World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser       Date:  2000

9.  MR arthrography of the shoulder and hip after fluoroscopic landmarking.

Authors:  T T Miller
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  Interactive MR-guided biopsy in an open-configuration MR imaging system.

Authors:  S G Silverman; B D Collick; M R Figueira; R Khorasani; D F Adams; R W Newman; G P Topulos; F A Jolesz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  9 in total

1.  1.5 T augmented reality navigated interventional MRI: paravertebral sympathetic plexus injections.

Authors:  David R Marker; Paweena U Thainual; Tamas Ungi; Aaron J Flammang; Gabor Fichtinger; Iulian I Iordachita; John A Carrino; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.630

2.  Design and development of a mobile image overlay system for needle interventions.

Authors:  M Anand; F King; T Ungi; A Lasso; J Rudan; J Jayender; J Fritz; J A Carrino; F A Jolesz; G Fichtinger
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2014

3.  MR-guided perineural injection of the ganglion impar: technical considerations and feasibility.

Authors:  David R Marker; Paweena U-Thainual; Tamas Ungi; Aaron J Flammang; Gabor Fichtinger; Iulian I Iordachita; John A Carrino; Jan Fritz
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  [Value of virtual reality technology in preoperative planning of transtrochanteric curved varus osteotomy for avascular necrosis of femoral head in adults].

Authors:  Le Shi; Yanxin Fan; Chao Zhang; Jirong Shen
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-08-15

5.  Ultrasound-guided interventions with augmented reality in situ visualisation: a proof-of-mechanism phantom study.

Authors:  Nadja A Farshad-Amacker; Till Bay; Andrea B Rosskopf; José M Spirig; Florian Wanivenhaus; Christian W A Pfirrmann; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2020-02-04

Review 6.  Spine Surgery Assisted by Augmented Reality: Where Have We Been?

Authors:  Yanting Liu; Min-Gi Lee; Jin-Sung Kim
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2022-04       Impact factor: 2.759

7.  Augmented reality for interventional oncology: proof-of-concept study of a novel high-end guidance system platform.

Authors:  Marco Solbiati; Katia M Passera; Alessandro Rotilio; Francesco Oliva; Ilaria Marre; S Nahum Goldberg; Tiziana Ierace; Luigi Solbiati
Journal:  Eur Radiol Exp       Date:  2018-07-31

8.  Potential use of a diluted high-relaxivity gadolinium-based intra-articular contrast agent for magnetic resonance arthrography: an in-vitro study.

Authors:  Carmelo Messina; Domenico Albano; Davide Orlandi; Vito Chianca; Angelo Corazza; Federica Ferrari; Salvatore Gitto; Luca Maria Sconfienza
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Body-Mounted Robotic System for MRI-Guided Shoulder Arthrography: Cadaver and Clinical Workflow Studies.

Authors:  Niravkumar Patel; Jiawen Yan; Gang Li; Reza Monfaredi; Lukasz Priba; Helen Donald-Simpson; Joyce Joy; Andrew Dennison; Andreas Melzer; Karun Sharma; Iulian Iordachita; Kevin Cleary
Journal:  Front Robot AI       Date:  2021-05-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.