Literature DB >> 22843420

International models of investigator-initiated trials: implications for Japan.

E L Trimble1, J Ledermann2, K Law3, T Miyata4, C K Imamura5, B-H Nam6, Y H Kim7, Y-J Bang8, M Michaels9, D Ardron10, S Amano11, Y Ando12, T Tominaga12, K Kurokawa13, N Takebe14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Academic/institutional investigator-initiated clinical trials benefit individuals and society by supplementing gaps in industry-sponsored clinical trials. MATERIALS: In May 2010, experts from Japan, the Republic of Korea, the UK, and the United States, met at a symposium in Tokyo, Japan, to discuss how policies related to the conduct of clinical trials, which have been shown to be effective, may be applied to other regions of the world.
RESULTS: In order to increase the availability of anticancer drugs world-wide, nations including Japan should examine the benefits of increasing the number of investigator-initiated clinical trials. These trials represent one of the most effective ways to translate basic scientific knowledge into clinical practice. These trials should be conducted under GCP guidelines and include Investigational New Drug application submissions with the ultimate goal of future drug approval.
CONCLUSIONS: To maximize the effectiveness of these trials, a policy to educate health care professionals, cancer patients and their families, and the public in general on the benefits of clinical trials should be strengthened. Finally, policies that expedite the clinical development of novel cancer drugs which have already been shown to be effective in other countries are needed in many nations including Japan to accelerate drug approval.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22843420      PMCID: PMC3501232          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  9 in total

1.  Practical issues and lessons learned from multi-regional clinical trials via case examples: a Japanese perspective.

Authors:  Yuki Ando; Toshimitsu Hamasaki
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2010 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.894

2.  Recommendations for collection and handling of specimens from group breast cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Brian R Leyland-Jones; Christine B Ambrosone; John Bartlett; Matthew J C Ellis; Rebecca A Enos; Adekunle Raji; Michael R Pins; Jo Anne Zujewski; Stephen M Hewitt; John F Forbes; Mark Abramovitz; Sofia Braga; Fatima Cardoso; Nadia Harbeck; Carsten Denkert; Scott D Jewell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Improving cancer outcomes through international collaboration in academic cancer treatment trials.

Authors:  Edward L Trimble; Jeffrey S Abrams; Ralph M Meyer; Fabien Calvo; Eduardo Cazap; James Deye; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thomas J Fitzgerald; Denis Lacombe; Max Parmar; Nita Seibel; Lalitha Shankar; Ann Marie Swart; Patrick Therasse; Bhadrasain Vikram; Remy von Frenckell; Michael Friedlander; Keiichi Fujiwara; Richard S Kaplan; Francoise Meunier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-08-31       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Regulatory science as a bridge between science and society.

Authors:  T Tominaga; Y Asahina; Y Uyama; T Kondo
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Experimental therapies: Investigator-initiated cancer trials with INDs for approval in Japan.

Authors:  Chiyo K Imamura; Naoko Takebe; Seigo Nakamura; Hideyuki Saya; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 66.675

6.  Applying community-based participatory research principles and approaches in clinical trials: forging a new model for cancer clinical research.

Authors:  Sarena D Seifer; Margo Michaels; Stacy Collins
Journal:  Prog Community Health Partnersh       Date:  2010

Review 7.  The development of priority cervical cancer trials: a Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup report.

Authors:  Henry Charles Kitchener; William Hoskins; William Small; Gillian M Thomas; Edward Lloyd Trimble
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.437

8.  Multidisciplinary meeting on male breast cancer: summary and research recommendations.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde; Jo Anne Zujewski; Leah Kamin; Sharon Giordano; Susan Domchek; William F Anderson; John M S Bartlett; Karen Gelmon; Zeina Nahleh; Jonas Bergh; Bruno Cutuli; Giancarlo Pruneri; Worta McCaskill-Stevens; Julie Gralow; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Fatima Cardoso
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Endometrial cancer state of the science meeting.

Authors:  Henry C Kitchener; Edward L Trimble
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.437

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.