Literature DB >> 20683424

The development of priority cervical cancer trials: a Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup report.

Henry Charles Kitchener1, William Hoskins, William Small, Gillian M Thomas, Edward Lloyd Trimble.   

Abstract

Since the late 1990s, when a spate of US studies reported the benefit of chemoradiation for cervical cancer, there has been a dearth of clinical trials in cervical cancer. This requires to be addressed with urgency because this disease is responsible for a quarter of a million deaths globally each year, mostly in developing countries, but therapeutic advances are required in all health care settings. The Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) is a worldwide collaborative of leading national groups that develops and promotes multinational trials in gynecologic cancer. In recognition of the pressing need for action, the GCIG convened an international meeting with expert representations from most of the GCIG groups and selected large centers in low- and middle-income countries. The focus was to identify consensus on several concepts for clinical trials, which would be developed and promoted by the GCIG and launched with major international participation. The first half of the meeting was devoted to a resume of the current state of the knowledge and identifying the gaps most needing new evidence. The second half of the meeting was concerned with achieving consensus on the way forward. There were 2 principal outcomes. The first was a proposal to establish, under the umbrella of GCIG, a cervical cancer trials network of centers from countries currently outside GCIG (Eastern Europe, India, Thailand, Southern Africa, and South and Central America), which could increase international participation in trials, conducted within the principles of good clinical practice. The second was to identify the priorities for clinical trials. These included additional systemic therapy before or after chemoradiation; less radical surgery for small, early-stage tumors; the use of fewer fractions to improve cost-effectiveness of treatment in centers with limited resources; and chemotherapy to improve resectability of bulky tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20683424     DOI: 10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181e730aa

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN: 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  8 in total

Review 1.  Radiotherapy and chemoradiation after surgery for early cervical cancer.

Authors:  Linda Rogers; Shing Shun N Siu; David Luesley; Andrew Bryant; Heather O Dickinson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-05-16

2.  International models of investigator-initiated trials: implications for Japan.

Authors:  E L Trimble; J Ledermann; K Law; T Miyata; C K Imamura; B-H Nam; Y H Kim; Y-J Bang; M Michaels; D Ardron; S Amano; Y Ando; T Tominaga; K Kurokawa; N Takebe
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Radiation therapy oncology group gynecologic oncology working group: comprehensive results.

Authors:  David K Gaffney; Anuja Jhingran; Lorraine Portelance; Akila Viswanathan; Tracey Schefter; Joanne Weidhaas; William Small
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.437

4.  Advances and Concepts in Cervical Cancer Trials: A Road Map for the Future.

Authors:  Satoru Sagae; Bradley J Monk; Eric Pujade-Lauraine; David K Gaffney; Kailash Narayan; Sang Young Ryu; Mary McCormack; Marie Plante; Antonio Casado; Alexander Reuss; Adriana Chávez-Blanco; Henry Kitchener; Byung-Ho Nam; Anuja Jhingran; Sarah Temkin; Linda Mileshkin; Els Berns; Suzy Scholl; Corinne Doll; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Fabrice Lecuru; William Small
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.437

5.  Analysis of factors contributing to the low survival of cervical cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy in Kenya.

Authors:  Innocent O Maranga; Lynne Hampson; Anthony W Oliver; Anas Gamal; Peter Gichangi; Anselmy Opiyo; Catharine M Holland; Ian N Hampson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A systematic review of radiotherapy capacity in low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Surbhi Grover; Melody J Xu; Alyssa Yeager; Lori Rosman; Reinou S Groen; Smita Chackungal; Danielle Rodin; Margaret Mangaali; Sommer Nurkic; Annemarie Fernandes; Lilie L Lin; Gillian Thomas; Ana I Tergas
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 6.244

7.  Consecutive magnetic resonance imaging during brachytherapy for cervical carcinoma: predictive value of volume measurements with respect to persistent disease and prognosis.

Authors:  J E Mongula; B F M Slangen; D M J Lambregts; F Cellini; F C H Bakers; L C H W Lutgens; T Van Gorp; A J Kruse; R F P M Kruitwagen; R G H Beets-Tan
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Predictive criteria for MRI-based evaluation of response both during and after radiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Jordy Mongula; Brigitte Slangen; Doenja Lambregts; Frans Bakers; Shekar Mahesh; Ludy Lutgens; Toon Van Gorp; Roy Vliegen; Roy Kruitwagen; Regina Beets-Tan
Journal:  J Contemp Brachytherapy       Date:  2016-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.