Literature DB >> 22841290

Probability and surprisal in auditory comprehension of morphologically complex words.

Laura Winther Balling1, R Harald Baayen.   

Abstract

Two auditory lexical decision experiments document for morphologically complex words two points at which the probability of a target word given the evidence shifts dramatically. The first point is reached when morphologically unrelated competitors are no longer compatible with the evidence. Adapting terminology from Marslen-Wilson (1984), we refer to this as the word's initial uniqueness point (UP1). The second point is the complex uniqueness point (CUP) introduced by Balling and Baayen (2008), at which morphologically related competitors become incompatible with the input. Later initial as well as complex uniqueness points predict longer response latencies. We argue that the effects of these uniqueness points arise due to the large surprisal (Levy, 2008) carried by the phonemes at these uniqueness points, and provide independent evidence that how cumulative surprisal builds up in the course of the word co-determines response latencies. The presence of effects of surprisal, both at the initial uniqueness point of complex words, and cumulatively throughout the word, challenges the Shortlist B model of Norris and McQueen (2008), and suggests that a Bayesian approach to auditory comprehension requires complementation from information theory in order to do justice to the cognitive cost of updating probability distributions over lexical candidates.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22841290     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  8 in total

1.  Rapid Transformation from Auditory to Linguistic Representations of Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Christian Brodbeck; L Elliot Hong; Jonathan Z Simon
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Conceptual relations compete during auditory and visual compound word recognition.

Authors:  Daniel Schmidtke; Christina L Gagné; Victor Kuperman; Thomas L Spalding; Benjamin V Tucker
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 2.331

3.  Sliding into happiness: A new tool for measuring affective responses to words.

Authors:  Amy Beth Warriner; David I Shore; Louis A Schmidt; Constance L Imbault; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol       Date:  2017-03

4.  DIANA, a Process-Oriented Model of Human Auditory Word Recognition.

Authors:  Louis Ten Bosch; Lou Boves; Mirjam Ernestus
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-05-23

5.  Emotion and language: valence and arousal affect word recognition.

Authors:  Victor Kuperman; Zachary Estes; Marc Brysbaert; Amy Beth Warriner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2014-02-03

6.  Opacity, Transparency, and Morphological Priming: A Study of Prefixed Verbs in Dutch.

Authors:  Ava Creemers; Amy Goodwin Davies; Robert J Wilder; Meredith Tamminga; David Embick
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2019-09-27       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Statistical models of morphology predict eye-tracking measures during visual word recognition.

Authors:  Minna Lehtonen; Matti Varjokallio; Henna Kivikari; Annika Hultén; Sami Virpioja; Tero Hakala; Mikko Kurimo; Krista Lagus; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

8.  Revisiting the Suffixing Preference: Native-Language Affixation Patterns Influence Perception of Sequences.

Authors:  Alexander Martin; Jennifer Culbertson
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-08-13
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.