Literature DB >> 28252996

Sliding into happiness: A new tool for measuring affective responses to words.

Amy Beth Warriner1, David I Shore1, Louis A Schmidt1, Constance L Imbault2, Victor Kuperman1.   

Abstract

Reliable measurement of affective responses is critical for research into human emotion. Affective evaluation of words is most commonly gauged on multiple dimensions-including valence (positivity) and arousal-using a rating scale. Despite its popularity, this scale is open to criticism: It generates ordinal data that is often misinterpreted as interval, it does not provide the fine resolution that is essential by recent theoretical accounts of emotion, and its extremes may not be properly calibrated. In 5 experiments, the authors introduce a new slider tool for affective evaluation of words on a continuous, well-calibrated and high-resolution scale. In Experiment 1, participants were shown a word and asked to move a manikin representing themselves closer to or farther away from the word. The manikin's distance from the word strongly correlated with the word's valence. In Experiment 2, individual differences in shyness and sociability elicited reliable differences in distance from the words. Experiment 3 validated the results of Experiments 1 and 2 using a demographically more diverse population of responders. Finally, Experiment 4 (along with Experiment 2) suggested that task demand is not a potential cause for scale recalibration. In Experiment 5, men and women placed a manikin closer or farther from words that showed sex differences in valence, highlighting the sensitivity of this measure to group differences. These findings shed a new light on interactions among affect, language, and individual differences, and demonstrate the utility of a new tool for measuring word affect. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28252996      PMCID: PMC5334777          DOI: 10.1037/cep0000112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1196-1961


  36 in total

1.  Bridging the gap between the pros and cons in treating ordinal scales as interval scales from an analysis point of view.

Authors:  S T Wang; M L Yu; C J Wang; C C Huang
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

3.  Emotion words, regardless of polarity, have a processing advantage over neutral words.

Authors:  Stavroula-Thaleia Kousta; David P Vinson; Gabriella Vigliocco
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2009-07-09

4.  How useful are corpus-based methods for extrapolating psycholinguistic variables?

Authors:  Paweł Mandera; Emmanuel Keuleers; Marc Brysbaert
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 2.143

5.  Treating ordinal scales as interval scales: an attempt to resolve the controversy.

Authors:  T R Knapp
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Affective biases in English are bi-dimensional.

Authors:  Amy Beth Warriner; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2014-10-14

7.  The emotion probe. Studies of motivation and attention.

Authors:  P J Lang
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1995-05

8.  You can't drink a word: lexical and individual emotionality affect subjective familiarity judgments.

Authors:  Chris Westbury
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-10

9.  Walk to me when I smile, step back when I'm angry: emotional faces modulate whole-body approach-avoidance behaviors.

Authors:  John F Stins; Karin Roelofs; Jody Villan; Karen Kooijman; Muriel A Hagenaars; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Positivity of the English language.

Authors:  Isabel M Kloumann; Christopher M Danforth; Kameron Decker Harris; Catherine A Bliss; Peter Sheridan Dodds
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Investigating the effects of pain observation on approach and withdrawal actions.

Authors:  Carl Michael Galang; Mina Pichtikova; Taryn Sanders; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Reliability of the sliding scale for collecting affective responses to words.

Authors:  C Imbault; D Shore; V Kuperman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2018-12

3.  Emotional reactivity and perspective-taking in individuals with and without severe depressive symptoms.

Authors:  Constance Imbault; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Words describing feelings about death: A comparison of sentiment for self and others and changes over time.

Authors:  Lauren R Miller-Lewis; Trent W Lewis; Jennifer Tieman; Deb Rawlings; Deborah Parker; Christine R Sanderson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.