Literature DB >> 22840518

Hawkmoth pollinators decrease seed set of a low-nectar Petunia axillaris line through reduced probing time.

Anna Brandenburg1, Cris Kuhlemeier, Redouan Bshary.   

Abstract

Although deception of floral pollinators is well known among orchids, the majority of animal-pollinated plants secure pollination by nectar rewards. The costs and benefits of nectar production remain poorly understood. Here, we developed a crossing design to introgress a low-nectar-volume locus of Petunia integrifolia into the genetic background of P. axillaris. The resulting introgression line resembled P. axillaris but produced only one-third of the nectar volume. When exposed simultaneously to low-nectar and wild-type P. axillaris plants, hawkmoth pollinators reduced their probing duration on low-nectar plants but otherwise did not show any signs of discrimination against these plants. However, reduced probing duration resulted in reduced seed production in the low-nectar plants despite their higher reproductive potential as evidenced by hand pollination. In line with this interpretation, we found a positive correlation between probing duration and seed set, and hawkmoth pollination of low-nectar plants that were manually supplemented with nectar to parental levels yielded seed sets similar to hand pollination. Thus, a simple self-serving pollinator behavior--the adjustment of probing time in response to nectar volume--may select against reducing nectar and protect many plant-pollinator mutualisms against a drift toward parasitism.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22840518     DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  18 in total

Review 1.  Why mutual helping in most natural systems is neither conflict-free nor based on maximal conflict.

Authors:  Redouan Bshary; Klaus Zuberbühler; Carel P van Schaik
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Signal verification can promote reliable signalling.

Authors:  Mark Broom; Graeme D Ruxton; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-25       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Birds see the true colours of fruits to live off the fat of the land.

Authors:  H Martin Schaefer; Alfredo Valido; Pedro Jordano
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 4.  Evolutionary ecology of nectar.

Authors:  Amy L Parachnowitsch; Jessamyn S Manson; Nina Sletvold
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2019-01-23       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Power and temptation cause shifts between exploitation and cooperation in a cleaner wrasse mutualism.

Authors:  Simon Gingins; Johanna Werminghausen; Rufus A Johnstone; Alexandra S Grutter; Redouan Bshary
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives.

Authors:  Timotheüs Van der Niet; Rod Peakall; Steven D Johnson
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.357

7.  Artificial asymmetric warming reduces nectar yield in a Tibetan alpine species of Asteraceae.

Authors:  Junpeng Mu; Youhong Peng; Xinqiang Xi; Xinwei Wu; Guoyong Li; Karl J Niklas; Shucun Sun
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.357

8.  Limits of selection against cheaters: birds prioritise visual fruit advertisement over taste.

Authors:  Zhen Wang; H Martin Schaefer
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  How scent and nectar influence floral antagonists and mutualists.

Authors:  Danny Kessler; Mario Kallenbach; Celia Diezel; Eva Rothe; Mark Murdock; Ian T Baldwin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  The evolution of floral deception in Epipactis veratrifolia (Orchidaceae): from indirect defense to pollination.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Jin; Zong-Xin Ren; Song-Zhi Xu; Hong Wang; De-Zhu Li; Zheng-Yu Li
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 4.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.