Literature DB >> 20088634

Innovative health reform models: pay-for-performance initiatives.

Seth W Glickman1, Eric D Peterson.   

Abstract

Pay-for-performance (P4P) programs have the potential to improve overall quality of care by narrowing gaps between what national care guidelines recommend and those treatments actually delivered in routine community practice. P4P is also viewed as a tool to promote more efficient use of healthcare resources while improving patient outcomes. P4P provides financial incentives for quality of service instead of quantity of service. Despite the promise of healthcare quality, concerns have been raised that P4P may have potential unintended consequences for patients, physicians, and hospitals. The shortcomings of many traditional P4P programs have fueled the emergence of new and innovative models of payment reform. P4P and newer models that link reimbursement with quality and efficiency show promise to improve patient outcomes and lower costs, but multiple approaches are needed to ensure that future initiatives provide value for key stakeholders, including patients, providers, and payers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20088634

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Manag Care        ISSN: 1088-0224            Impact factor:   2.229


  8 in total

1.  Full report from the first annual Heart Rhythm Society Research Forum: a vision for our research future, "dream, discover, develop, deliver".

Authors:  Christine M Albert; Peng-Sheng Chen; Mark E Anderson; Michael E Cain; Glenn I Fishman; Sanjiv M Narayan; Jeffrey E Olgin; Peter M Spooner; William G Stevenson; David R Van Wagoner; Douglas L Packer
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 6.343

2.  Pediatric pay-for-performance in asthma: who pays?

Authors:  Rodney Johnson; Chitra Dinakar
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.806

3.  Pay-for-performance in a community substance abuse clinic.

Authors:  Ryan Vandrey; Maxine L Stitzer; Shauna P Acquavita; Patricia Quinn-Stabile
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2011-04-12

4.  A test of concordance between patient and psychiatrist valuations of multiple treatment goals for schizophrenia.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Lara Slawik; Annette Schmeding; Jens Reimer; Dieter Naber; Olaf Kuhnigk
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Exploration of ICD-9-CM coding of chronic disease within the Elixhauser Comorbidity Measure in patients with chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Jennifer Hornung Garvin; Andrew Redd; Dan Bolton; Pauline Graham; Dominic Roche; Peter Groeneveld; Molly Leecaster; Shuying Shen; Mark G Weiner
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2013-10-01

6.  Quality of breast cancer care: perception versus practice.

Authors:  Nina A Bickell; Jennifer Neuman; Kezhen Fei; Rebeca Franco; Kathie-Ann Joseph
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Segmental increases in force application during colonoscope insertion: quantitative analysis using force monitoring technology.

Authors:  Louis Y Korman; Lawrence J Brandt; David C Metz; Nadim G Haddad; Stanley B Benjamin; Susan K Lazerow; Hannah L Miller; David A Greenwald; Sameer Desale; Milind Patel; Armen Sarvazyan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 9.427

8.  Awareness of, attitude toward, and willingness to participate in pay for performance programs among family physicians: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Chyi-Feng Jan; Meng-Chih Lee; Ching-Ming Chiu; Cheng-Kuo Huang; Shinn-Jang Hwang; Che-Jui Chang; Tai-Yuan Chiu
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 2.497

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.