Literature DB >> 16963385

Estimates of pregnancies averted through California's family planning waiver program in 2002.

Diana Greene Foster1, M Antonia Biggs, Gorette Amaral, Claire Brindis, Sandy Navarro, Mary Bradsberry, Felicia Stewart.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: During its first year of operation (1997-1998), California's family planning program, Family PACT, helped more than 750,000 clients to avert an estimated 108,000 pregnancies. Given subsequent increases in the numbers of clients served and contraceptive methods offered by the program, updated estimates of its impact on fertility are needed.
METHODS: Claims data on contraceptives dispensed were used to estimate the number of pregnancies experienced by women in the program in 2002. Medical record data on methods used prior to enrollment were used to predict client fertility in the absence of the program. Further analyses examined the sensitivity of these estimates to alternative assumptions about contraceptive failure rates, contraceptive continuation and contraceptive use in the absence of program services.
RESULTS: Almost 6.4 million woman-months of contraception, provided primarily by oral contraceptives (57%), barrier methods (19%) and the injectable (18%), were dispensed through Family PACT during 2002. As a result, an estimated 205,000 pregnancies-which would have resulted in 79,000 abortions and 94,000 births, including 21,400 births to adolescents-were averted. Changing the base assumptions regarding contraceptive failure rates or method use had relatively small effects on the estimates, whereas assuming that clients would use no contraceptives in the absence of Family PACT nearly tripled the estimate of pregnancies averted.
CONCLUSION: Because all contraceptive methods substantially reduce the risk of pregnancy, Family PACT's impact on preventing pregnancy lies primarily in providing contraceptives to women who would otherwise not use any method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16963385     DOI: 10.1363/psrh.38.126.06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health        ISSN: 1538-6341


  5 in total

1.  Public savings from the prevention of unintended pregnancy: a cost analysis of family planning services in California.

Authors:  Gorette Amaral; Diana Greene Foster; M Antonia Biggs; Carolyn Bradner Jasik; Signy Judd; Claire D Brindis
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Limited socioeconomic opportunities and Latina teen childbearing: a qualitative study of family and structural factors affecting future expectations.

Authors:  Alexandra M Minnis; Kristen Marchi; Lauren Ralph; M Antonia Biggs; Sarah Combellick; Abigail Arons; Claire D Brindis; Paula Braveman
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2013-04

3.  Extending contraceptive coverage under the Affordable Care Act saves public funds.

Authors:  Suzanne Burlone; Alison B Edelman; Aaron B Caughey; James Trussell; Stella Dantas; Maria I Rodriguez
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.375

4.  Cost savings from the provision of specific methods of contraception in a publicly funded program.

Authors:  Diana Greene Foster; Daria P Rostovtseva; Claire D Brindis; M Antonia Biggs; Denis Hulett; Philip D Darney
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Population policies, programmes and the environment.

Authors:  J Joseph Speidel; Deborah C Weiss; Sally A Ethelston; Sarah M Gilbert
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.