Literature DB >> 2283918

On the relation among speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs.

A Postma1, H Kolk, D J Povel.   

Abstract

In this study the relationship between speech errors (deviations from a speech plan), disfluencies (interruptions in the execution of a speech plan), and self-repairs (corrections of speech errors) was examined. Two hypotheses were formulated: Either disfluencies are special types of speech errors, or they resemble self-repairs (i.e., they are corrective actions applied to anticipated, internal errors). To test these two hypotheses, patterns of speech errors, disfluencies, and self-repairs were compared in a task in which speakers recited stimulus sentences four times in succession under time pressure. Subjects in one condition were explicitly instructed to pay close attention to accuracy of speaking. In another condition subjects were told that speech accuracy was not important. A much lower speech error rate was found in the higher-accuracy condition, but rates of disfluencies and self-repairs did not differ significantly between the two accuracy conditions. This is regarded as support for the self-repair account of disfluencies. When accuracy of speaking is stressed, speakers tend to avoid and repair speech errors at the cost of reduced speech fluency.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2283918     DOI: 10.1177/002383099003300102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech        ISSN: 0023-8309            Impact factor:   1.500


  11 in total

1.  Listeners' uses of um and uh in speech comprehension.

Authors:  J E Fox Tree
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring.

Authors:  C C Oomen; A Postma
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2001-03

3.  Self-Editing: On the Relation Between behavioral and Psycholinguistic Approaches.

Authors:  L Kimberly Epting; Thomas S Critchfield
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  2006

4.  Is the fluency of language outputs related to individual differences in intelligence and executive function?

Authors:  Paul E Engelhardt; Joel T Nigg; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-07

5.  More on Lexical Bias: How Efficient Can a "Lexical Editor" Be?

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Gary S Dell
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.059

6.  Cross-sectional study of phoneme and rhyme monitoring abilities in children between 7 and 13 years.

Authors:  Jayanthi Sasisekaran; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist       Date:  2011-06-08

7.  Linguistic Maze Production by Children and Adolescents With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Authors:  Katherine J Bangert; Lizbeth H Finestack
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-01-16       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  Brief Report: Linguistic Mazes and Perseverations in School-Age Boys with Fragile X Syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorder and Relationships with Maternal Maze Use.

Authors:  Nell Maltman; Laura Friedman; Emily Lorang; Audra Sterling
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2021-03-25

9.  Modeling Interactions between Speech Production and Perception: Speech Error Detection at Semantic and Phonological Levels and the Inner Speech Loop.

Authors:  Bernd J Kröger; Eric Crawford; Trevor Bekolay; Chris Eliasmith
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.380

10.  Lexical and Grammatical Errors in Developmentally Language Disordered and Typically Developed Children: The Impact of Age and Discourse Genre.

Authors:  Aleksandr N Kornev; Ingrida Balčiūnienė
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.