Literature DB >> 11385824

Effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring.

C C Oomen1, A Postma.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine effects of time pressure on mechanisms of speech production and self-monitoring. The most widely accepted monitoring theory (Levelt, 1989) suggests that monitoring proceeds through language perception, that is, speech error detection is primarily based on the parsing of one's own inner and overt speech. Twenty-four subjects described visual networks at two different rates (normal and fast). The time pressure manipulation affected a number of temporal characteristics: the error to cutoff and cutoff to repair times were shorter in the fast than in the normal condition. The results indicate that the monitor adjusts its speed of error detection and repair planning to the faster speech output rate. The time pressure manipulation did not affect the accuracy of error detection. The implications for the perception theory of monitoring are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11385824     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010377828778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res        ISSN: 0090-6905


  17 in total

1.  Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory.

Authors:  R J Hartsuiker; H H Kolk
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

4.  Relation between programming time and duration of the response being programmed.

Authors:  S T Klapp; C I Erwin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Theories of monitoring and the timing of repairs in spontaneous speech.

Authors:  E R Blackmer; J L Mitton
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1991-06

6.  Time patterns in spontaneous speech--cognitive stride or random walk? A reply to Jaffe, et al.

Authors:  A I Henderson
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  1974 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Research and clinical approaches to disorders of speech rate.

Authors:  J Jaffe; S W Anderson; R W Rieber
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

9.  Some neurolinguistic implications of prearticulatory editing in production.

Authors:  S M Garnsey; G S Dell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  Word interruption in self-repairing.

Authors:  S Brédart
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  1991-03
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Observing the what and when of language production for different age groups by monitoring speakers' eye movements.

Authors:  Zenzi M Griffin; Daniel H Spieler
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Working memory capacity and self-repair behavior in first and second language oral production.

Authors:  Ahmad Mojavezi; Mohammad Javad Ahmadian
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-06

3.  Is comprehension necessary for error detection? A conflict-based account of monitoring in speech production.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Gary S Dell; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Is the fluency of language outputs related to individual differences in intelligence and executive function?

Authors:  Paul E Engelhardt; Joel T Nigg; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2013-09-07

5.  Speech-Language Dissociations, Distractibility, and Childhood Stuttering.

Authors:  Chagit E Clark; Edward G Conture; Tedra A Walden; Warren E Lambert
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Motor movement matters: the flexible abstractness of inner speech.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

7.  The role of inhibition in the production of disfluencies.

Authors:  Paul E Engelhardt; Martin Corley; Joel T Nigg; Fernanda Ferreira
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-07

8.  Are phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection the result of a monitoring bias?

Authors:  Els Severens; Elie Ratinckx; Victor S Ferreira; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.143

9.  Towards a New Model of Verbal Monitoring.

Authors:  Hanna S Gauvin; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-09-03
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.