Literature DB >> 20126302

More on Lexical Bias: How Efficient Can a "Lexical Editor" Be?

Nazbanou Nozari1, Gary S Dell.   

Abstract

The lexical bias effect (the tendency for phonological speech errors to create words more often than nonwords) has been debated for over 30 years. One account attributes the effect to a lexical editor, a strategic component of the production system that examines each planned phonological string, and suppresses it if it is a nonword. The alternative explanation is that the effect occurs automatically as a result of phonological-lexical feedback. Using a new paradigm, we explicitly asked participants to do lexical editing on their planned speech and compared performance on this inner lexical decision task to results obtained from the standard lexical decision task in three subsequent experiments. Our experimentally created "lexical editor" needed 300 ms to recognize and suppress nonwords, as determined by comparing reaction times when editing was and was not required. Therefore, we concluded that even though strategic lexical editing can be done, any such editing that occurs in daily speech occurs sporadically, if at all.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20126302      PMCID: PMC2746698          DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.09.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mem Lang        ISSN: 0749-596X            Impact factor:   3.059


  21 in total

1.  Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory.

Authors:  R J Hartsuiker; H H Kolk
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  A theory of lexical access in speech production.

Authors:  W J Levelt; A Roelofs; A S Meyer
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

Authors:  A Postma
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2000-11-16

4.  A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Pablo Gomez; Gail McKoon
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  Spoonish spanerisms: A lexical bias effect in Spanish.

Authors:  Robert J Hartsuiker; Inés Antón-Méndez; Bjorn Roelstraete; Albert Costa
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Inner speech slips exhibit lexical bias, but not the phonemic similarity effect.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-04-02

7.  Halting in Single Word Production: A Test of the Perceptual Loop Theory of Speech Monitoring.

Authors:  L Robert Slevc; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.059

8.  Language production: Methods and methodologies.

Authors:  K Bock
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1996-12

9.  Monitoring and self-repair in speech.

Authors:  W J Levelt
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1983-07

10.  A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-step Model of Lexical Access: Predicting Word Repetition from Picture Naming.

Authors:  Gary S Dell; Nadine Martin; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.059

View more
  9 in total

1.  Naming and repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Audrey K Kittredge; Gary S Dell; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.059

2.  Density pervades: an analysis of phonological neighbourhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment.

Authors:  Erica L Middleton; Myrna F Schwartz
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  "Twisting fingers": The case for interactivity in typed language production.

Authors:  Svetlana Pinet; Nazbanou Nozari
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-08

4.  The case for subphonemic attenuation in inner speech: comment on Corley, Brocklehurst, and Moat (2011).

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Alice's adventures in um-derland: Psycholinguistic sources of variation in disfluency production.

Authors:  Scott H Fraundorf; Duane G Watson
Journal:  Lang Cogn Process       Date:  2013

6.  Motor movement matters: the flexible abstractness of inner speech.

Authors:  Gary M Oppenheim; Gary S Dell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12

7.  Neural organization of speech production: A lesion-based study of error patterns in connected speech.

Authors:  Brielle C Stark; Alexandra Basilakos; Gregory Hickok; Chris Rorden; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Cascading and feedback in interactive models of production: a reflection of forward modeling?

Authors:  Gary S Dell
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 12.579

9.  Phonological similarity affects production of gestures, even in the absence of overt speech.

Authors:  Nazbanou Nozari; Tilbe Göksun; Sharon L Thompson-Schill; Anjan Chatterjee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.