| Literature DB >> 22838504 |
Biao Fan1, Lian-Hai Zhang, Yong-Ning Jia, Xi-Yao Zhong, Yi-Qiang Liu, Xiao-Jing Cheng, Xiao-Hong Wang, Xiao-Fang Xing, Ying Hu, Ying-Ai Li, Hong Du, Wei Zhao, Zhao-Jian Niu, Ai-Ping Lu, Ji-You Li, Jia-Fu Ji.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: S100A9 was originally discovered as a factor secreted by inflammatory cells. Recently, S100A9 was found to be associated with several human malignancies. The purpose of this study is to investigate S100A9 expression in gastric cancer and explore its role in cancer progression.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22838504 PMCID: PMC3476982 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-316
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Figure 1Expression of S100A9 in gastric cancer and adjacent non-cancerous tissues. (A) Different expression value of S100A9 in 72 gastric cancer tissues and paired no-cancerous tissues by analyzing data from illumina Sentrix BeadChip cDNA microarray. (B-E) Immunohistochemical staining of S100A9 in gastric cancer tissues (B) metastatic lymph nodes (C), chronic gastritis (D), and adjacent non-cancerous gastric mucosa (E). S100A9 localization was revealed as brown or red granulated loci in the cytoplasm of infiltrating inflammatory cells, especially in mononuclear phagocytes and neutrophil granulocytes. (magnification 200×).
Figure 2High S100A9 cell count in cancer tissue indicates better outcome in gastric cancer patients. (A) Scatter plot of S100A9-positive inflammatory cell count in each pathological TNM stage. The blue line indicates the level of 200. (B) ROC curve of S100A9 cell count for the prediction of pathological TNM stage. Arrow indicated the cutoff point about 200. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival for each pathological TNM stage. (D) Kaplan-Meier analysis of overall survival for high S100A9 cell count (≥ 200) group and low S100A9 cell count (< 200) group. (Only 176 patients were enrolled in the analysis for one patient lost to follow-up).
Association of S100A9-positive inflammatory cell count in cancer tissues with clinicopathological parameters in gastric cancer patients
| Sex | | | 0.125 |
| Male | 74 | 50 | |
| Female | 25 | 28 | |
| Age | | | 0.089 |
| <50 | 32 | 18 | |
| 50-59 | 24 | 12 | |
| 60-69 | 33 | 33 | |
| > = 70 | 10 | 15 | |
| Tumor location | | | 0.271 |
| Cardia | 26 | 15 | |
| Non-cardia | 73 | 63 | |
| Depth of tumor invasion** | | | 0.011 |
| T1 | 3 | 2 | |
| T2 | 7 | 19 | |
| T3 | 69 | 42 | |
| T4 | 20 | 15 | |
| Lymph node metastasis | | | 0.009 |
| N0 | 13 | 23 | |
| N1 | 32 | 30 | |
| N2 | 32 | 17 | |
| N3 | 22 | 8 | |
| Liver metastasis | | | 0.571 |
| Negative | 89 | 68 | |
| Positive | 10 | 10 | |
| TNM stage | | | 0.002 |
| І | 3 | 12 | |
| II | 37 | 35 | |
| III | 50 | 21 | |
| IV | 9 | 10 | |
| Vascular invasion | | | 0.742 |
| Negative | 38 | 31 | |
| Positive | 58 | 43 | |
| Not recorded* | 3 | 4 | |
| Differentiation** | | | 0.472 |
| Well | 2 | 4 | |
| Moderately + Poorly | 82 | 66 | |
| Other types | 13 | 6 | |
| Not determined | 2 | 2 |
*Data incomplete.
** Fisher's exact test.
Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for overall survival of gastric cancer patients
| Sex | 0.671 | 1.106 | 0.694-1.765 |
| Male versus female | | | |
| Age | 0.179 | 1.148 | 0.938-1.405 |
| <50 | | | |
| 50-59 | | | |
| 60-69 | | | |
| > = 70 | | | |
| Tumor location | 0.545 | 0.864 | 0.538-1.387 |
| Cardia | | | |
| Differentiation | 0.301 | 0.751 | 0.437-1.292 |
| Well versus moderately + poorly | | | |
| Lymph node metastasis | 0.006 | 1.841 | 1.196-2.835 |
| N0 + N1 versus N2 + N3 | | | |
| Depth of tumor invasion | 0.1 | 1.756 | 0.897-3.435 |
| T1 + T2 versus T3 + T4 | | | |
| Liver metastasis | 0 | 3.461 | 2.002-5.983 |
| Negative versus Positive | | | |
| Vascular invasion | 0.107 | 1.452 | 0.922-2.285 |
| Negative versus Positive | | | |
| S100A9-positive inflammatory cell count | 0.046 | 0.643 | 0.417-0.991 |
| <200 versus > = 200 |
RR: relative risk; CI: confidence interval.
Figure 3Immunofluorescence images of S100A9, S100A8 and S100A8/A9 proteins in tissue microarray slides containing gastric cancer tissues (A-J) and chronic gastritis tissues (K-T), and chronic appendicitis tissues with exacerbation (U-Y). S100A9 and S100A8 were detected by monoclonal antibody, prelabeled with the Zenon Alexa Fluor Mouse IgG Labeling Kit (with green and red fluorescence respectively). The nucleus was stained by DAPI. S100A8/A9 heterodimers were detectable using the dimer-specific antibody 27E10 from BMA Biomedicals prelabeled with green fluorescence. The co-localization of S100A9 and S100A8 or S100A8/A9 was showed in merged pictures (D, I, N, S, X) and larger merged pictures (E, J, O, T, Y). White arrow in 3 T shows co-localization of S100A9 and S100A8/A9 in chronic gastritis. Bar length, 50 μm.
Figure 4Effect of S100A9 recombinant protein on invasion and migration of gastric cancer cell lines. In transwell assay, AGS (A) and BGC-823 (C) cells were treated with serum-free medium or medium containing 10, 20, 50 or 100 ng/ml S100A9 recombinant protein. Invasive cells were counted in randomly nine selected microscopic fields (200×). In wound healing assay, AGS (B) and BGC-823 (D) cells were treated with serum-free RPMI-1640 medium or medium containing 100 ng/ml S100A9 recombinant protein. Photos were captured by an inverted phase-contrast microscope at 0 h, 24 h and 48 h after wounding. Three independent experiments were performed. Results were presented as means ± S.D. of these independent experiments. P value vs. control group.