BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrocardiographic gating, commonly used in MR carotid plaque imaging, can negatively affect intraplaque contrast if the TR is inappropriate. The present study aimed to determine whether a non-gated technique with appropriate TRs can accurately evaluate intraplaque characteristics in specimens excised by CEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined 40 consecutive patients who underwent CEA (59-82 years of age) by using a 1.5T scanner. Axial T1WI with a TR of 500 ms and PDWI and T2WI with a TR of 3000 ms with a self-navigated rotating-blade scan instead of cardiac gating were obtained. Signal intensities of the plaque and adjacent muscle were measured, and the CR on T1WI, PDWI, and T2WI as well as the gray-scale median on US were correlated with the pathologic findings of the CEA specimens. RESULTS: On T1WI, the CRs of the carotid plaques differed significantly among groups in which the main components were histologically confirmed as fibrous tissue, lipid/necrosis, and hemorrhage (0.54-1.17, 1.16-1.53, and 1.40-2.29, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for discriminating lipid/necrosis/hemorrhage from fibrous tissue were 96% and 100%, respectively. On T2WI, the CRs of plaques with lipid/necrosis were significantly higher than those of other groups, but the CRs on PDWI and the gray-scale median on US were not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Non-gated MR plaque imaging, particularly T1WI, can readily predict the intraplaque main components of the carotid artery with high sensitivity and specificity.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Electrocardiographic gating, commonly used in MR carotid plaque imaging, can negatively affect intraplaque contrast if the TR is inappropriate. The present study aimed to determine whether a non-gated technique with appropriate TRs can accurately evaluate intraplaque characteristics in specimens excised by CEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We prospectively examined 40 consecutive patients who underwent CEA (59-82 years of age) by using a 1.5T scanner. Axial T1WI with a TR of 500 ms and PDWI and T2WI with a TR of 3000 ms with a self-navigated rotating-blade scan instead of cardiac gating were obtained. Signal intensities of the plaque and adjacent muscle were measured, and the CR on T1WI, PDWI, and T2WI as well as the gray-scale median on US were correlated with the pathologic findings of the CEA specimens. RESULTS: On T1WI, the CRs of the carotid plaques differed significantly among groups in which the main components were histologically confirmed as fibrous tissue, lipid/necrosis, and hemorrhage (0.54-1.17, 1.16-1.53, and 1.40-2.29, respectively). The sensitivity and specificity for discriminating lipid/necrosis/hemorrhage from fibrous tissue were 96% and 100%, respectively. On T2WI, the CRs of plaques with lipid/necrosis were significantly higher than those of other groups, but the CRs on PDWI and the gray-scale median on US were not significantly different among the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Non-gated MR plaque imaging, particularly T1WI, can readily predict the intraplaque main components of the carotid artery with high sensitivity and specificity.
Authors: R Sztajzel; S Momjian; I Momjian-Mayor; N Murith; K Djebaili; G Boissard; M Comelli; G Pizolatto Journal: Stroke Date: 2005-02-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Vincent C Cappendijk; Kitty B J M Cleutjens; Alfons G H Kessels; Sylvia Heeneman; Geert Willem H Schurink; Rob J T J Welten; Werner H Mess; Mat J A P Daemen; Jos M A van Engelshoven; M Eline Kooi Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: N Yamada; M Higashi; R Otsubo; T Sakuma; N Oyama; R Tanaka; K Iihara; H Naritomi; K Minematsu; H Naito Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2007-02 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Norihide Takaya; Chun Yuan; Baocheng Chu; Tobias Saam; Hunter Underhill; Jianming Cai; Nam Tran; Nayak L Polissar; Carol Isaac; Marina S Ferguson; Gwenn A Garden; Steven C Cramer; Kenneth R Maravilla; Beverly Hashimoto; Thomas S Hatsukami Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-02-09 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Baocheng Chu; Annette Kampschulte; Marina S Ferguson; William S Kerwin; Vasily L Yarnykh; Kevin D O'Brien; Nayak L Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Stroke Date: 2004-04-01 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: S Narumi; M Sasaki; T Natori; M Yamaguchi Oura; K Ogasawara; M Kobayashi; Y Sato; Y Ogasawara; J Hitomi; Y Terayama Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2015-01-08 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Narumi; M Sasaki; H Ohba; K Ogasawara; M Kobayashi; T Natori; J Hitomi; H Itagaki; T Takahashi; Y Terayama Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Y Sato; K Ogasawara; S Narumi; M Sasaki; A Saito; E Tsushima; T Namba; M Kobayashi; K Yoshida; Y Terayama; A Ogawa Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2016-02-04 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Adam Mazurek; Anna Borratynska; Urszula Gancarczyk; Lukasz Czyz; Martyna Sikorska; Lukasz Tekieli; Bartosz Sobien; Marcin Jakiel; Mariusz Trystula; Tomasz Drazkiewicz; Piotr Podolec; Piotr Musialek Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2022-09-26 Impact factor: 4.061