Literature DB >> 17296997

Association between signal hyperintensity on T1-weighted MR imaging of carotid plaques and ipsilateral ischemic events.

N Yamada1, M Higashi, R Otsubo, T Sakuma, N Oyama, R Tanaka, K Iihara, H Naritomi, K Minematsu, H Naito.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: To investigate associations between cerebral ischemic events and signal hyperintensity in T1-weighted MR imaging (T1WI) of carotid plaque according to stenosis severity and to estimate persistence of T1WI signal hyperintensity.
METHODS: A total of 222 patients (392 atherosclerotic carotid arteries) underwent plaque imaging using 3D inversion-recovery-based T1WI (magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition with gradient-echo [MPRAGE]). Carotid plaque with intensity on MPRAGE of >200% that of adjacent muscle was categorized as "high signal intensity" and correlated with ipsilateral ischemic events within the previous 6 months. A total of 58 arteries (35 patients) underwent repeat MR imaging a total of 70 times at a median interval of 279 days (range, 10-1037 days).
RESULTS: Ipsilateral ischemic events were more frequent in patients with MPRAGE high signals than in patients with low signals in the 0%-29%, 30%-69%, and 70%-99% stenosis groups: Relative risk (95% confidence interval) was 2.50 (0.96-6.51), 7.55 (1.84-31.04), and 1.98 (1.01-3.90), respectively. In the 70 cases of repeat MR imaging, 29 of 30 cases with high signals on the preceding MR imaging maintained high signals. Of the 58 arteries that underwent repeat MR imaging, 4 of 22 carotid arteries with high signals developed ipsilateral subsequent ischemic events within 1 year, whereas none with low signals developed subsequent events.
CONCLUSIONS: Carotid plaque signal hyperintensity on T1WI is strongly associated with previous ipsilateral ischemic events, persisting over a period of months, and may indicate risk of subsequent events. Larger clinical trials are warranted to clarify associations between signal hyperintensity and risk of subsequent cerebral ischemic events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17296997      PMCID: PMC7977430     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  32 in total

Review 1.  The symptomatic carotid plaque.

Authors:  J Golledge; R M Greenhalgh; A H Davies
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Direct magnetic resonance imaging of carotid artery thrombus in acute stroke.

Authors:  A R Moody; S Allder; G Lennox; J Gladman; P Fentem
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Reanalysis of the final results of the European Carotid Surgery Trial.

Authors:  P M Rothwell; S A Gutnikov; C P Warlow
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Critical carotid stenoses: morphologic and chemical similarity between symptomatic and asymptomatic plaques.

Authors:  H S Bassiouny; H Davis; N Massawa; B L Gewertz; S Glagov; C K Zarins
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.268

5.  North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress.

Authors: 
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Characterization of signal properties in atherosclerotic plaque components by intravascular MRI.

Authors:  W J Rogers; J W Prichard; Y L Hu; P R Olson; D H Benckart; C M Kramer; D A Vido; N Reichek
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 8.311

7.  In vivo accuracy of multispectral magnetic resonance imaging for identifying lipid-rich necrotic cores and intraplaque hemorrhage in advanced human carotid plaques.

Authors:  C Yuan; L M Mitsumori; M S Ferguson; N L Polissar; D Echelard; G Ortiz; R Small; J W Davies; W S Kerwin; T S Hatsukami
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-10-23       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Visualization of fibrous cap thickness and rupture in human atherosclerotic carotid plaque in vivo with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  T S Hatsukami; R Ross; N L Polissar; C Yuan
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Prevalence of complicated carotid atheroma as detected by magnetic resonance direct thrombus imaging in patients with suspected carotid artery stenosis and previous acute cerebral ischemia.

Authors:  Rachael E Murphy; Alan R Moody; Paul S Morgan; Anne L Martel; G S Delay; Steve Allder; Shane T MacSweeney; William G Tennant; John Gladman; John Lowe; Beverley J Hunt
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-06-09       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Significance of plaque ulceration in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

Authors:  M Eliasziw; J Y Streifler; A J Fox; V C Hachinski; G G Ferguson; H J Barnett
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 7.914

View more
  44 in total

1.  Safety of protected carotid artery stenting in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis and carotid intraplaque hemorrhage.

Authors:  W Yoon; S K Kim; M S Park; H J Chae; H K Kang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Carotid plaque signal differences among four kinds of T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging techniques: a histopathological correlation study.

Authors:  Ayumi Saito; Makoto Sasaki; Kuniaki Ogasawara; Masakazu Kobayashi; Jiro Hitomi; Shinsuke Narumi; Hideki Ohba; Mao Yamaguchi; Kohsuke Kudo; Yasuo Terayama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Preoperative Assessment of High-Risk Aortic Plaque by Magnetization-Prepared Rapid Acquisition with Gradient-Echo Imaging in a Patient with Total Arch Replacement.

Authors:  Yoshimasa Seike; Kenji Minatoya; Hiroaki Sasaki; Hiroshi Tanaka; Tatsuya Itonaga; Tatsuya Oda; Yosuke Inoue; Teruo Noguchi; Hatsue Ishibashi-Ueda; Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2015-11-27

4.  Discriminating carotid atherosclerotic lesion severity by luminal stenosis and plaque burden: a comparison utilizing high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla.

Authors:  Xihai Zhao; Hunter R Underhill; Qian Zhao; Jianming Cai; Feiyu Li; Minako Oikawa; Li Dong; Hideki Ota; Thomas S Hatsukami; Baocheng Chu; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 7.914

5.  Novel 3D-CT evaluation of carotid stent volume: greater chronological expansion of stents in patients with vulnerable plaques.

Authors:  Hisakazu Itami; Koji Tokunaga; Yu Okuma; Tomohito Hishikawa; Kenji Sugiu; Kentaro Ida; Isao Date
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage imaging at 3.0-T MR imaging: comparison of the diagnostic performance of three T1-weighted sequences.

Authors:  Hideki Ota; Vasily L Yarnykh; Marina S Ferguson; Hunter R Underhill; J Kevin Demarco; David C Zhu; Minako Oikawa; Li Dong; Xihai Zhao; Alonso Collar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 7.  Multimodality imaging for the prevention of cardiovascular events: Coronary artery calcium and beyond.

Authors:  Duygu Kocyigit; Alexandra Scanameo; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

8.  Predicting carotid plaque characteristics using quantitative color-coded T1-weighted MR plaque imaging: correlation with carotid endarterectomy specimens.

Authors:  S Narumi; M Sasaki; H Ohba; K Ogasawara; M Kobayashi; T Natori; J Hitomi; H Itagaki; T Takahashi; Y Terayama
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Factors Associated With Ischemic Stroke in Patients Suspected of Cervical Artery Dissection.

Authors:  J Scott McNally; Peter J Hinckley; Akihiko Sakata; Laura B Eisenmenger; Seong-Eun Kim; Adam H De Havenon; Edward P Quigley; Eli Iacob; Gerald S Treiman; Dennis L Parker
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Signal features of the atherosclerotic plaque at 3.0 Tesla versus 1.5 Tesla: impact on automatic classification.

Authors:  William S Kerwin; Fei Liu; Vasily Yarnykh; Hunter Underhill; Minako Oikawa; Wei Yu; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.813

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.