Literature DB >> 16432644

A randomized controlled trial of mailed osteoporosis education to older adults.

D H Solomon1, J S Finkelstein, J M Polinski, M Arnold, A Licari, D Cabral, C Canning, J Avorn, J N Katz.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis represents a growing public health concern; however, current rates of management are sub-optimal. The aim of our study was to assess, in a randomized controlled trial, the effect of a mailed educational intervention on older adults' knowledge, attitudes, and preventive behaviors regarding osteoporosis. The setting was a large publicly funded state pharmacy benefits program. The patients were 31,715 Medicare beneficiaries from Pennsylvania who participated in a drug benefits program for low-to-moderate income elderly people.
METHODS: All women aged over 65 years, and all men and women with a history of fracture or long-term oral use of glucocorticoid, were included. Approximately half of the participants (intervention group) were randomly selected to receive three mailings aimed at improving knowledge of osteoporosis and enhancing preventive activities, such as using calcium and vitamin D, reducing fall risks in the home, obtaining a bone mineral density (BMD) test, and taking medications when necessary. The other participants did not receive the intervention mailings and served as controls. We surveyed a sample of intervention and control subjects to determine the effects of the intervention on knowledge, attitudes, self-efficacy (confidence in one's ability to perform specific activities), and behavior regarding osteoporosis prevention and treatment. Six hundred randomly selected participants in the intervention group and an equal number in the control group were invited to participate.
RESULTS: Twenty-six had died and 636 of the remaining 1,185 (54%) completed the survey. Respondents and non-respondents did not differ significantly with respect to measured sociodemographic factors. All scales had good reliability (all Cronbach's alphas>0.65). Knowledge of osteoporosis was generally very good and did not differ between intervention (mean=65% correct responses) and control subjects (mean=67% correct; P=0.4). Perceived susceptibility to osteoporosis was relatively high and similar across groups (P=0.4). Self-efficacy for participating in osteoporosis prevention and treatment was very strong in both the intervention (mean=4.3 on a 0-5 scale) and control (mean=4.2, P=0.03) groups . On average, subjects in the intervention group reported participating in 3.5 of 6 preventive osteoporosis activities compared with 3.4 in the control group (P=0.5).
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the controls, a mailed educational intervention for osteoporosis was not associated with better knowledge, higher perceived susceptibility, or performance of preventive measures among the at-risk older adults that we studied. The intervention group demonstrated a small increase in self-efficacy. More intensive patient interventions or intervention aimed at other aspects of the care process may be required to bring about changes that lead to a reduction in fractures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16432644     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-005-0049-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente; J C Norcross
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-09

2.  Medication use patterns for osteoporosis: an assessment of guidelines, treatment rates, and quality improvement interventions.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; Charles Morris; Hailu Cheng; Danielle Cabral; Jeffrey N Katz; Joel S Finkelstein; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 7.616

3.  Women's decisions about hormone replacement therapy after education and bone densitometry.

Authors:  A Papaioannou; W Parkinson; J Adachi; A O'Connor; E E Jolly; P Tugwell; M Bédard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-17       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Osteoporosis action: design of the healthy bones project trial.

Authors:  Daniel H Solomon; M Alan Brookhart; Jennifer Polinski; Jeffrey N Katz; Danielle Cabral; Andrea Licari; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2005-01-27       Impact factor: 2.226

5.  What is the impact of osteoporosis education and bone mineral density testing for postmenopausal women in a managed care setting?

Authors:  S J Rolnick; R Kopher; J Jackson; L R Fischer; R Compo
Journal:  Menopause       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.953

6.  Randomized trial of osteoporosis screening. Use of hormone replacement therapy and quality-of-life results.

Authors:  D J Torgerson; R E Thomas; M K Campbell; D M Reid
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-13

7.  Use of a peripheral dexa measurement for osteoporosis screening.

Authors:  Julienne K Kirk; Mindy Nichols; John G Spangler
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low-trauma fracture.

Authors:  T Chevalley; P Hoffmeyer; J-P Bonjour; R Rizzoli
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture.

Authors:  Sumit R Majumdar; Brian H Rowe; Deb Folk; Jeffrey A Johnson; Brian H Holroyd; Donald W Morrish; Walter P Maksymowych; Ivan P Steiner; Charles H Harley; Brian J Wirzba; David A Hanley; Sandra Blitz; Anthony S Russell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  National trends in osteoporosis visits and osteoporosis treatment, 1988-2003.

Authors:  Randall S Stafford; Rebecca L Drieling; Adam L Hersh
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2004-07-26
View more
  31 in total

1.  Effect of self-referral on bone mineral density testing and osteoporosis treatment.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Adrianne C Feldstein; Douglas W Roblin; Jeroan J Allison; Jeffrey R Curtis; David T Redden; Mary M Rix; Brandi E Robinson; Ana G Rosales; Monika M Safford; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 2.  Education intervention for older adults with osteoporosis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Q Y Gai; H Lv; Y P Li; Q M Fu; P Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Patient perceptions of osteoporosis treatment thresholds.

Authors:  Joan M Neuner; Marilyn M Schapira
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.666

4.  Interventions to improve osteoporosis care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J Martin; M Viprey; B Castagne; B Merle; C Giroudon; R Chapurlat; A-M Schott
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  A systematic review of the effectiveness of interventions to improve post-fracture investigation and management of patients at risk of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Little; Martin P Eccles
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 7.327

6.  Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Maria I Danila; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth J Rahn; Amy S Mudano; David T Redden; Peng Li; Jeroan J Allison; Fred A Anderson; Allison Wyman; Susan L Greenspan; Andrea Z LaCroix; Jeri W Nieves; Stuart L Silverman; Ethel S Siris; Nelson B Watts; Michael J Miller; Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy H Warriner; Nicole C Wright; Kenneth G Saag
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Community pharmacist-initiated screening program for osteoporosis: randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  N Yuksel; S R Majumdar; C Biggs; R T Tsuyuki
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 8.  Interventions for improving the appropriate use of imaging in people with musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Simon D French; Sally Green; Rachelle Buchbinder; Hayley Barnes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

9.  A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada.

Authors:  S B Jaglal; G Hawker; V Bansod; N M Salbach; M Zwarenstein; J Carroll; D Brooks; C Cameron; E Bogoch; L Jaakkimainen; H Kreder
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  A randomized trial of a mailed intervention and self-scheduling to improve osteoporosis screening in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Amy H Warriner; Ryan C Outman; Elizabeth Kitchin; Lang Chen; Sarah Morgan; Kenneth G Saag; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 6.741

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.