Literature DB >> 22836711

Relative validity of the Geisinger Rural Aging Study food frequency questionnaire.

D C Mitchell1, K L Tucker, J Maras, F R Lawrence, H Smiciklas-Wright, G L Jensen, C D Still, T J Hartman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative validity of a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and evaluate the effectiveness of the instrument for assessing nutritional risk in older adults.
DESIGN: A cross-over design with participants completing two different dietary assessment instruments in random order.
SETTING: The Geisinger Rural Aging Study (GRAS), a longitudinal study of over 20,000 adults living in the central, northern and eastern counties of Pennsylvania. PARTICIPANTS: A subset of GRAS consisting of 245 older adults (60% women) ranging in age from 70 to 95 years. MEASUREMENTS: Energy and nutrient intakes were assessed from two instruments: a population specific food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) and four 24-hour dietary recalls conducted over a two week period.
RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficients between the FFQ and dietary recalls for most nutrients were 0.5 or higher which suggests that the FFQ provided relatively valid estimates of macro and micronutrient intakes examined. Bland-Altman plots were generated to examine the agreement between instruments. Data are shown for energy, folate and zinc with close agreement at lower intakes indicative of risk for folate and zinc. Sensitivity results also showed that the FFQ was able to correctly classify individuals adequately at risk for most nutrients examined.
CONCLUSION: This population specific FFQ appears to be a valid instrument for use in in evaluating risk for many nutrients that are of particular concern in older adults residing throughout many predominately rural counties in Pennsylvania.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22836711     DOI: 10.1007/s12603-012-0030-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging        ISSN: 1279-7707            Impact factor:   4.075


  39 in total

1.  Does nutritionist review of a self-administered food frequency questionnaire improve data quality?

Authors:  B J Caan; E Lanza; A Schatzkin; A O Coates; B K Brewer; M L Slattery; J R Marshall; A Bloch
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Accuracy of telephone dietary recalls in elderly subjects.

Authors:  S Dubois; J F Boivin
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  1990-12

3.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Assessing the effect of underreporting energy intake on dietary patterns and weight status.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Diane C Mitchell; Carla Miller; Helen Smiciklas-Wright
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2007-01

5.  Validation and calibration of food-frequency questionnaire measurements in the Northern Sweden Health and Disease cohort.

Authors:  Ingegerd Johansson; Göran Hallmans; Asa Wikman; Carine Biessy; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 4.022

6.  Adaptation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Puerto Rican and non-Hispanic adults.

Authors:  K L Tucker; L A Bianchi; J Maras; O I Bermudez
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  Persistent oral health problems associated with comorbidity and impaired diet quality in older adults.

Authors:  Regan L Bailey; Jenny Harris Ledikwe; Helen Smiciklas-Wright; Diane C Mitchell; Gordon L Jensen
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-08

8.  Validity of estimated dietary eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid intakes determined by interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire among older adults with mild-to-moderate cognitive impairment or dementia.

Authors:  Lisa N Arsenault; Nirupa Matthan; Tammy M Scott; Gerard Dallal; Alice H Lichtenstein; Marshal F Folstein; Irwin Rosenberg; Katherine L Tucker
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Performance of a food-frequency questionnaire in the US NIH-AARP (National Institutes of Health-American Association of Retired Persons) Diet and Health Study.

Authors:  Frances E Thompson; Victor Kipnis; Douglas Midthune; Laurence S Freedman; Raymond J Carroll; Amy F Subar; Charles C Brown; Matthew S Butcher; Traci Mouw; Michael Leitzmann; Arthur Schatzkin
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 4.022

10.  Validation of a food frequency questionnaire for Hispanics.

Authors:  Gladys Block; Patricia Wakimoto; Christopher Jensen; Shelly Mandel; Robin R Green
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.830

View more
  4 in total

1.  Validation of Nutrient Intake Estimates Derived Using a Semi-Quantitative FFQ against 3 Day Diet Records in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging.

Authors:  S A Talegawkar; T Tanaka; J E Maras; L Ferrucci; K L Tucker
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.075

Review 2.  Leveraging Observational Cohorts to Study Diet and Nutrition in Older Adults: Opportunities and Obstacles.

Authors:  M Kyla Shea; Andres V Ardisson Korat; Paul F Jacques; Paola Sebastiani; Rebecca Cohen; Amy E LaVertu; Sarah L Booth
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2022-10-02       Impact factor: 11.567

3.  Relative validity of brief-type self-administered diet history questionnaire among very old Japanese aged 80 years or older.

Authors:  Satomi Kobayashi; Xiaoyi Yuan; Satoshi Sasaki; Yusuke Osawa; Takumi Hirata; Yukiko Abe; Michiyo Takayama; Yasumichi Arai; Yukie Masui; Tatsuro Ishizaki
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Application and interpretation of multiple statistical tests to evaluate validity of dietary intake assessment methods.

Authors:  Martani J Lombard; Nelia P Steyn; Karen E Charlton; Marjanne Senekal
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.271

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.