Literature DB >> 2246447

Accuracy of telephone dietary recalls in elderly subjects.

S Dubois1, J F Boivin.   

Abstract

Accuracy of telephone-administered dietary recalls was determined for 159 elderly subjects by comparing the telephone recalls of single midday meals consumed at congregate meal sites with data on actual intake for the meals. Accuracy was determined for kinds of food eaten, size of portions eaten, and content of 15 nutrients. Exact agreement between the two data sources on the kinds of food eaten occurred for only 55% of the observed food items. For 5 of the 10 food groups evaluated, the bias in mean recalled portion-size data was less than 10%. There was evidence of attenuated regression slopes relating recalled to observed portion sizes for 4 of the 10 food groups; adjusted r2 values for the recalled portion sizes ranged from 0.02 to 0.94. Because errors in the recalls of the kinds and amounts eaten tended to go in different directions, the accuracy of the nutrient data was better than that for the food-item or the portion-size data. For 12 of the 15 nutrients evaluated, the bias in mean recalled intake data was less than 10%. Although the adjusted r2 values for the recalled nutrient data ranged from 0.24 to 0.58, there was evidence of attenuated regression slopes relating recalled intake to observed intake for only 5 of the 15 nutrients. We conclude that telephone contact is an acceptable way to obtain short-term dietary recall data from elderly subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2246447

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8223


  4 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of interobserver reliability in nutrition studies that use direct observation of school meals.

Authors:  Michelle L Baglio; Suzanne Domel Baxter; Caroline H Guinn; William O Thompson; Nicole M Shaffer; Francesca H A Frye
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2004-09

2.  Accuracy of fourth-graders' dietary recalls of school breakfast and school lunch validated with observations: in-person versus telephone interviews.

Authors:  Suzanne Domel Baxter; William O Thompson; Mark S Litaker; Caroline H Guinn; Francesca H A Frye; Michelle L Baglio; Nicole M Shaffer
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.045

3.  Relative validity of the Geisinger Rural Aging Study food frequency questionnaire.

Authors:  D C Mitchell; K L Tucker; J Maras; F R Lawrence; H Smiciklas-Wright; G L Jensen; C D Still; T J Hartman
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.075

4.  Predictors of dietary intake in a functionally dependent elderly population in the community.

Authors:  H Payette; K Gray-Donald; R Cyr; V Boutier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.308

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.