Literature DB >> 2283610

Informed consent: can we educate patients?

G Askew1, K W Pearson, D Cryer.   

Abstract

Previous reports have shown consent to be 'short' of informed in many cases. One hundred patients, including a control group, were interviewed between 2 and 7 days after their operations. Those given an information sheet before the operation had a better recall of their operations than the controls, the overall awareness being 97 and 69% respectively. This may have medico-legal implications but further studies are required.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh：

Year:  1990        PMID： 2283610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb        ISSN： 0035-8835


  10 in total

Review 1.  Interventions to improve patient comprehension in informed consent for medical and surgical procedures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Yael Schenker; Alicia Fernandez; Rebecca Sudore; Dean Schillinger
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2010-03-31       Impact factor: 2.583

2.  [On informed patient consent].

Authors:  M C Kayser; Y von Harder; B Friemert; M A Scherer
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Corrected Feedback: A Procedure to Enhance Recall of Informed Consent to Research among Substance Abusing Offenders.

Authors:  David S Festinger; Karen L Dugosh; Jason R Croft; Patricia L Arabia; Douglas B Marlowe
Journal:  Ethics Behav       Date:  2010-01-01

4.  [Increasing efficiency and patient satisfaction by structured clinical processes in presurgical visits].

Authors:  J Schuld; M R Moussavian; B Frank; U A Schmidt; O Kollmar; M K Schilling; S Richter
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Bioethics for clinicians: 2. Disclosure.

Authors:  E Etchells; G Sharpe; M M Burgess; P A Singer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-08-15       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Factors affecting quality of informed consent.

Authors:  C Lavelle-Jones; D J Byrne; P Rice; A Cuschieri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-04-03

Review 7.  A review of surgical informed consent: past, present, and future. A quest to help patients make better decisions.

Authors:  Wouter K G Leclercq; Bram J Keulers; Marc R M Scheltinga; Paul H M Spauwen; Gert-Jan van der Wilt
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  The influence of written information during the consenting process on patients' recall of operative risks. A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  C Mauffrey; E M Prempeh; J John; G Vasario
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-04-21       Impact factor: 3.075

9.  Extended preoperative patient education using a multimedia DVD-impact on patients receiving a laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  D Wilhelm; S Gillen; H Wirnhier; M Kranzfelder; A Schneider; A Schmidt; H Friess; H Feussner
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  Cognitive function in patients undergoing arthroplasty: the implications for informed consent.

Authors:  N Demosthenous; J P St Mart; P Jenkins; A Chappel; Kenneth Cheng
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2011-06-20
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.