Matched comparison of kinematics in knees with mild and severe varus deformity using fixed- and mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: We examined knee kinematics in three 16-knee cohorts with the same implant design to clarify the influence of bearing mobility and preoperative deformity on the kinematics of posterior-stabilized knee arthroplasty. Compared to knees with mild deformity and a fixed-bearing implant, we hypothesized that a matched group of knees with mobile-bearing prostheses would show greater tibial axial rotation. We hypothesized that knees with the same fixed-bearing implant, but severe preoperative deformity, would have less axial rotation.
METHODS: A total of 58 knees in 48 patients were involved in this study from a consecutive single-surgeon total knee arthroplasty series. Sixteen knees received mobile-bearing prostheses, and a best-matched cohort of knees with fixed-bearing implants was selected. The 16 fixed-bearing knees with most severe preoperative deformity were selected as a third group. All knees were examined at least 1.5 years after surgery. Flexion, femoral external rotation, anteroposterior translation of both femoral condyles during squatting and deep knee flexion activities were evaluated using model-image registration techniques.
FINDINGS: We found some statistically significant, but small differences among the three groups in dynamic and static knee kinematics. In squatting, total femoral rotation for knees with fixed- and mobile-bearing implants, and knees with fixed-bearing implants after severe preoperative varus deformity, was not significantly different. [7° (SD3°), 9° (SD3°), 8° (SD3°), respectively, P=0.08].
INTERPRETATION: Similar kinematic results for knees with different tibial bearing surfaces and preoperative deformities indicate a robust treatment with this posterior stabilized implant. However, knees did not exhibit normal femoral rotations or functional flexion ranges.