Literature DB >> 22834760

The precopulatory function of male genital spines in Drosophila ananassae[Doleschall] (Diptera: Drosophilidae) revealed by laser surgery.

Karl Grieshop1, Michal Polak.   

Abstract

That male genital morphology evolves via postcopulatory sexual selection is a widely held view. In contrast, the precopulatory sexual selection hypothesis for genital evolution has received less attention. Here, we test the hypothesis that male genital spines of Drosophila ananassae promote competitive male copulation success. Using laser surgery to manipulate trait size, we demonstrate that incremental reductions of spine length progressively reduce male copulation success: males without spines failed entirely to copulate because of an inability to couple the genitalia together, whereas males with halfway ablated and blunted spines suffered reductions in copulation success of 87% and 13%, respectively. The decrease in copulation success resulting from spine length reduction was markedly stronger in sexually competitive environments than in noncompetitive environments, and females expressed resistance behaviors similarly toward competing male treatments, demonstrating directly the role of genital spines in promoting competitive copulation success. Because these spines are widespread within Drosophila, and because genital traits with precopulatory function are being discovered in a growing number of animal taxa, precopulatory sexual selection may have a more pervasive role in genital evolution than previously recognized.
© 2012 The Author(s). Evolution© 2012 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22834760     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01638.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  12 in total

1.  Sexual conflict and the function of genitalic claws in guppies (Poecilia reticulata).

Authors:  Lucia Kwan; Yun Yun Cheng; F Helen Rodd; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  Copulatory wounding and traumatic insemination.

Authors:  Klaus Reinhardt; Nils Anthes; Rolanda Lange
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Experimental reduction of intromittent organ length reduces male reproductive success in a bug.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; Imran A Rahman; Emily R Burdfield-Steel; E V Ginny Greenway; David M Shuker
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Penis size interacts with body shape and height to influence male attractiveness.

Authors:  Brian S Mautz; Bob B M Wong; Richard A Peters; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Emile van Lieshout; Clelia Gasparini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Multiple sexual selection pressures drive the rapid evolution of complex morphology in a male secondary genital structure.

Authors:  Stephen R Frazee; John P Masly
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.912

7.  Drosophila pachea asymmetric lobes are part of a grasping device and stabilize one-sided mating.

Authors:  Flor T Rhebergen; Virginie Courtier-Orgogozo; Julien Dumont; Menno Schilthuizen; Michael Lang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Coevolution between male and female genitalia in the Drosophila melanogaster species subgroup.

Authors:  Amir Yassin; Virginie Orgogozo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Fitness consequences of artificial selection on relative male genital size.

Authors:  Isobel Booksmythe; Megan L Head; J Scott Keogh; Michael D Jennions
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Variation in pre- and post-copulatory sexual selection on male genital size in two species of lygaeid bug.

Authors:  Liam R Dougherty; David M Shuker
Journal:  Behav Ecol Sociobiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.980

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.