| Literature DB >> 22829939 |
Ting Wang1, Guopei Chen, Qijie Zan, Chunbo Wang, Ying-juan Su.
Abstract
Why some species become successful invaders is an important issue in invasive biology. However, limited genomic resources make it very difficult for identifying candidate genes involved in invasiveness. Mikania micrantha H.B.K. (Asteraceae), one of the world's most invasive weeds, has adapted rapidly in response to novel environments since its introduction to southern China. In its genome, we expect to find outlier loci under selection for local adaptation, critical to dissecting the molecular mechanisms of invasiveness. An explorative amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) genome scan was used to detect candidate loci under selection in 28 M. micrantha populations across its entire introduced range in southern China. We also estimated population genetic parameters, bottleneck signatures, and linkage disequilibrium. In binary characters, such as presence or absence of AFLP bands, if all four character combinations are present, it is referred to as a character incompatibility. Since character incompatibility is deemed to be rare in populations with extensive asexual reproduction, a character incompatibility analysis was also performed in order to infer the predominant mating system in the introduced M. micrantha populations. Out of 483 AFLP loci examined using stringent significance criteria, 14 highly credible outlier loci were identified by Dfdist and Bayescan. Moreover, remarkable genetic variation, multiple introductions, substantial bottlenecks and character compatibility were found to occur in M. micrantha. Thus local adaptation at the genome level indeed exists in M. micrantha, and may represent a major evolutionary mechanism of successful invasion. Interactions between genetic diversity, multiple introductions, and reproductive modes contribute to increase the capacity of adaptive evolution.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22829939 PMCID: PMC3400595 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Map of sampled populations.
(A) Mikania micrantha. (B) Mikania cordata.
Locations of Mikania micrantha and Mikania cordata populations surveyed in this study.
| Species | Region | Population | Location | Latitude | Longitude | Sample size | Altitude (m) |
|
| Hong Kong | HK81 | Hong Kong Island, Stubbs Road, in shrubs | 22° 16′ 08″ N | 114° 10′ 49″ E | 15 | 74 |
| HK82 | Hong Kong Island, Barker Road, in tussock | 22° 16′ 09″ N | 114° 09′ 50″ E | 13 | 300 | ||
| HK84 | Hong Kong Island, Mount Gough, in tussock | 22° 16′ 05″ N | 114° 09′ 43″ E | 16 | 315 | ||
| HK85 | Hong Kong Island, Victoria Peak, in tussock | 22° 16′ 30″ N | 114° 08′ 57″ E | 15 | 503 | ||
| HK87 | Hong Kong Zoological and Botanical Gardens, under bamboo forest | 22° 16′55″N | 114° 09′23″ E | 12 | 372 | ||
| HK88 | New Territories, Hok Tau, in tussock | 22° 29′ 53″ N | 114° 10′ 49″ E | 15 | 46 | ||
| HK89 | New Territories, Luk Keng, Pat Sin Leng Country Park, rivulet-side | 22° 31′ 26″ N | 114° 12′ 57″ E | 12 | 8 | ||
| HK90 | Kowloon, Hong Kong Baptist University, slope | 22° 20′ 07″ N | 114° 10′ 57″ E | 19 | 25 | ||
| Macao | MA101 | Hác Sá Beach, wasteland | 22° 07′ 08″ N | 113° 34′ 04″ E | 15 | 3 | |
| MA105 | Hác Sá Village, roadside | 22° 07′ 02″ N | 113° 34′ 03″ E | 15 | 1 | ||
| MA106 | Hác Sá Beach, building site | 22° 07′16″N | 113°34′10″E | 14 | 8 | ||
| Shenzhen | SZ34 | Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Liang Yi Ting, in tussock | 22° 34′ 49″ N | 114° 10′ 08″ E | 14 | 88 | |
| SZ35 | Fairy Lake Botanical Garden, Desert Plant Section, roadside | 22°35′10″N | 114°10′26″E | 16 | 42 | ||
| SZ64 | The office of Mangrove Natural Reserve, roadside | 22° 31′ 58″ N | 114° 00′ 01″ E | 11 | 19 | ||
| SZ72 | Meilin Park, Huanshan Road, slope | 22° 33′ 59″ N | 114° 01′ 27″ E | 16 | 83 | ||
| SZ75 | Lotus Hill Park, the Kite Square, in tussock | 22° 33′ 14″ N | 114° 03′ 22″ E | 14 | 38 | ||
| SZ77 | Lotus Hill Park, under the Eucalypt forest | 22° 33′ 25″ N | 114° 02′ 57″ E | 16 | 46 | ||
| Neilingding | NLD1 | Management station, roadside | 22° 23′ 48″ N | 113° 49′ 09″ E | 15 | 3 | |
| NLD10 | Dong Jiao Zui Wan, slope, in shrubs | 22° 24′ 06″ N | 113° 48′ 44″ E | 14 | 51 | ||
| NLD15 | Dong Jiao Zui Wan, slope, under Spiny date palms | 22°24′21″N | 113°48′42″E | 17 | 145 | ||
| NLD26 | Nan Wan, in shrubs | 22° 23′ 41″ N | 113° 48′ 52″ E | 14 | 3 | ||
| NLD29 | Dong Wan, ravine | 22° 23′ 48″ N | 113° 49′ 38″ E | 15 | 15 | ||
| NLD30 | Bei Wan Ma Guan, in shrubs | 22° 25′ 12″ N | 113° 47′ 17″ E | 15 | 3 | ||
| NLD31 | Management station East, ravine | 22° 24′ 01″N | 113° 49′ 59″ E | 14 | 8 | ||
| Zhuhai | ZH43 | Qi'ao Island, roadside | 22° 24′ 37″ N | 113° 38′ 38″ E | 15 | 2 | |
| ZH50 | Qi'ao Island, No Jia Le, roadside | 22° 24′ 03″ N | 113° 37′ 40″ E | 12 | 2 | ||
| Dongguan | DG91 | Da Ling Shan forestry centre, Shan Zhu Wo | 22° 51′ 51″ N | 113° 46′ 21″ E | 16 | 174 | |
| DG92 | Da Ling Shan forestry centre, Chang Keng Kou | 22° 51′ 38″ N | 113° 46′ 27″ E | 15 | 114 | ||
|
| Hainan Island | HN1 | Xinglong, in arbors | 18° 42′04″ N | 110° 13′ 23″ E | 12 | 49 |
| HN2 | Xinglong, in tussock | 18° 42′03″ N | 110° 13′ 22″ E | 5 | 44 |
Estimates of genetic diversity, and test for linkage disequilibrium and character compatibility in populations of Mikania micrantha.
| Population | Number of loci | Number of polymorphic loci | Percentage of polymorphic loci | Nei's gene diversity |
|
|
|
| HK81 | 426 | 313 | 0.7347 | 0.2932 | 7.5391 | 0.0242 | 0.079 |
| HK82 | 427 | 273 | 0.6393 | 0.2548 | 6.3634 | 0.0234 | 0.027 |
| HK84 | 387 | 125 | 0.323 | 0.1358 | 15.5087 | 0.1252 | 0.512 |
| HK85 | 426 | 188 | 0.4413 | 0.1792 | 10.7784 | 0.0576 | 0.405 |
| HK87 | 383 | 95 | 0.248 | 0.0961 | 3.0253 | 0.0322 | 0.076 |
| HK88 | 429 | 205 | 0.4779 | 0.1957 | 7.8618 | 0.0385 | 0.261 |
| HK89 | 446 | 243 | 0.5448 | 0.2101 | 0.2056 | 0.0009 | 0.011 |
| HK90 | 413 | 203 | 0.4915 | 0.1977 | 6.3289 | 0.0314 | 0.065 |
| Hong Kong | 474 | 442 | 0.9325 | 0.3302 | 6.5539 | 0.0160 | 0.01 |
| MA101 | 418 | 237 | 0.567 | 0.2187 | 4.1371 | 0.0175 | 0.052 |
| MA105 | 389 | 173 | 0.4447 | 0.1773 | 8.8737 | 0.0516 | 0.004 |
| MA106 | 369 | 39 | 0.1057 | 0.0424 | 3.0656 | 0.0807 | 0.257 |
| Macao | 442 | 318 | 0.7195 | 0.2664 | 19.7051 | 0.0641 | 0.068 |
| SZ34 | 435 | 176 | 0.4046 | 0.1638 | 17.5379 | 0.1002 | 0.405 |
| SZ35 | 386 | 85 | 0.2202 | 0.0928 | 2.1485 | 0.02560 | 0.011 |
| SZ64 | 437 | 212 | 0.4851 | 0.1936 | 9.7626 | 0.0463 | 0.255 |
| SZ72 | 373 | 58 | 0.1555 | 0.07 | 7.8698 | 0.1382 | 0.101 |
| SZ75 | 451 | 267 | 0.592 | 0.234 | 6.2308 | 0.0234 | 0.006 |
| SZ77 | 433 | 243 | 0.5612 | 0.2265 | 22.1611 | 0.0916 | 0.206 |
| Shenzhen | 471 | 366 | 0.7771 | 0.287 | 7.2587 | 0.2091 | 0.031 |
| NLD1 | 426 | 196 | 0.4601 | 0.1863 | 20.7551 | 0.1065 | 0.346 |
| NLD10 | 381 | 52 | 0.1365 | 0.0547 | 3.8665 | 0.0759 | −0.074 |
| NLD15 | 430 | 180 | 0.4186 | 0.1599 | 12.4718 | 0.0697 | 0.216 |
| NLD26 | 390 | 59 | 0.1513 | 0.0639 | 6.7266 | 0.1160 | 0.096 |
| NLD29 | 437 | 223 | 0.5103 | 0.2016 | 18.5328 | 0.0835 | 0.170 |
| NLD30 | 373 | 47 | 0.126 | 0.0545 | 5.4156 | 0.1178 | −0.078 |
| NLD31 | 410 | 141 | 0.3439 | 0.1402 | 33.0933 | 0.2365 | −0.001 |
| Neilingding | 470 | 350 | 0.7447 | 0.2604 | 9.7616 | 0.0303 | 0.087 |
| ZH43 | 438 | 290 | 0.6621 | 0.2622 | 13.6221 | 0.0472 | 0.366 |
| ZH50 | 406 | 267 | 0.6576 | 0.2723 | 14.4875 | 0.0545 | 0.032 |
| Zhuhai | 457 | 376 | 0.8228 | 0.3193 | 10.4551 | 0.0281 | 0.121 |
| DG91 | 438 | 184 | 0.4201 | 0.1655 | 13.6645 | 0.0747 | 0.420 |
| DG92 | 435 | 171 | 0.3931 | 0.1515 | 22.3371 | 0.1315 | 0.478 |
| Dongguan | 458 | 241 | 0.5262 | 0.2028 | 6.7332 | 0.0282 | 0.180 |
| Total | 483 | 483 | 1.0000 | 0.3376 |
I, index of association; , modified index of association; IER, incompatibility excess ratio.
, P<0.05;
, P<0.01.
Genetic bottleneck of Mikania micrantha populations from six introduced regions in southern China.
| SMM | IAM | |||
| Region |
|
|
|
|
| HK81 | 268/45 | 0.00000 | 268/45 | 0.00000 |
| HK82 | 230/43 | 0.00000 | 230/43 | 0.00000 |
| HK84 | 101/24 | 0.00000 | 102/23 | 0.00000 |
| HK85 | 156/32 | 0.00000 | 156/32 | 0.00000 |
| HK87 | 75/20 | 0.00000 | 75/20 | 0.00000 |
| HK88 | 172/33 | 0.00000 | 172/33 | 0.00000 |
| HK89 | 202/41 | 0.00000 | 202/41 | 0.00000 |
| HK90 | 175/28 | 0.00000 | 175/28 | 0.00000 |
| Hong Kong | 277/165 | 0.00000 | 302/140 | 0.00000 |
| MA101 | 177/60 | 0.00000 | 177/60 | 0.00000 |
| MA105 | 138/35 | 0.00000 | 138/35 | 0.00000 |
| MA106 | 30/9 | 0.00448 | 30/9 | 0.00007 |
| Macao | 199/119 | 0.00000 | 242/76 | 0.00000 |
| SZ34 | 149/27 | 0.00000 | 149/27 | 0.00000 |
| SZ35 | 72/13 | 0.00000 | 72/13 | 0.00000 |
| SZ64 | 174/38 | 0.00000 | 174/38 | 0.00000 |
| SZ72 | 52/6 | 0.00000 | 52/6 | 0.00000 |
| SZ75 | 230/37 | 0.00000 | 230/37 | 0.00000 |
| SZ77 | 212/31 | 0.00000 | 212/31 | 0.00000 |
| Shenzhen | 243/123 | 0.00000 | 289/77 | 0.00000 |
| NLD1 | 171/25 | 0.00000 | 171/25 | 0.00000 |
| NLD10 | 41/11 | 0.00032 | 41/11 | 0.00000 |
| NLD15 | 149/31 | 0.00000 | 149/31 | 0.00000 |
| NLD26 | 50/9 | 0.00000 | 50/9 | 0.00000 |
| NLD29 | 186/37 | 0.00000 | 186/37 | 0.00000 |
| NLD30 | 42/5 | 0.00000 | 42/5 | 0.00000 |
| NLD31 | 119/22 | 0.00000 | 119/22 | 0.00000 |
| Neilingding | 222/128 | 0.00000 | 238/112 | 0.00000 |
| ZH43 | 250/40 | 0.00000 | 250/40 | 0.00000 |
| ZH50 | 221/46 | 0.00000 | 221/46 | 0.00000 |
| Zhuhai | 311/65 | 0.00000 | 323/53 | 0.00000 |
| DG91 | 146/38 | 0.00000 | 146/38 | 0.00000 |
| DG92 | 113/58 | 0.00000 | 115/56 | 0.00000 |
| Dongguan | 201/40 | 0.00000 | 214/27 | 0.00000 |
| Total | 309/174 | 0.00000 | 337/146 | 0.00000 |
P values are determined by a sign test under the stepwise mutation model (SMM) and the infinite allele model (IAM). H/H, the heterozygosity excess/deficiency ratio.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) of 483 AFLP loci for 28 Mikania micrantha populations from six introduced regions in southern China.
| Variance components | Percentage of total variation |
|
| |
| Among regions | 2.884 | 4.74 | <0.001 |
|
| Among populations within regions | 17.404 | 28.61 | <0.001 |
|
| Within populations | 40.538 | 66.65 | <0.001 |
|
The P-value was calculated by a permutation procedure based on 1023 replicates.
Figure 2Bayesian assignment proportions for K = 28 clusters determined in STRUCTURE 2.3.3.
Each vertical bar represents one individual.
Figure 3UPGMA dendrogram derived from AFLP data by Nei's [ unbiased genetic distances.
It shows the relationships among 28 examined populations of Mikania micrantha. Populations of Mikania cordata are used as the root. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap values (% of 1000 replicates). Only values larger than 40% are displayed. Branch lengths are proportional to genetic distances (see scale at the bottom of figure).
Comparison of outlier loci of Mikania micrantha under selection using Bayescan, Dfdist, and both with Dfdist and Bayescan, respectively.
| Approach | Outiler loci identified |
| Bayescan | 3, 4, 5, 11, 14, 17, 25, 43, 54, 57, 59, 116, 132, 153, 166, 167, 173, 177, 183, 184, 209, 219, 224, 228, 275, 276, 325, 347, 381, 388, 420, 425, 426, 434, 451, 455, 473, 483 |
| Dfdist | 3, 17, 25, 35, 50, 56, 57, 116, 132, 136, 177, 183, 184, 219, 231, 240, 324, 325, 342, 347, 381, 426, 465 |
| Bayescan and Dfdist | 3, 17, 25, 57, 116, 132, 177, 183, 184, 219, 325, 347, 381, 426 |
Figure 4Results of the simulations with Dfdist for outlier detection.
Plots representing F values are against heterozygosity. Each dot indicates an AFLP locus. The lower, intermediate, and higher lines represent the 0.5%, 50%, and 99.5% confidence intervals, respectively. Loci above the 99.5% line are regarded as outlier loci. (A) The result of Mikania micrantha. The 23 outlier loci under selection are represented by red dots accompanied by the locus number. (B) The result of Mikania cordata. No outlier locus under selection is detected.
Figure 5Genomic scan to identify outlier loci subject to selection by Bayescan approach.
Each point corresponds to an AFLP locus. F is plotted against the log10 of the posterior odds (PO), which provides evidence whether the locus is subject to selection or not. The vertical dashed line shows the decisive threshold value (log10 PO = 2.0) used for identifying outlier loci. (A) The result of Mikania micrantha. Shown as red dots, the 38 outlier loci with the corresponding locus number are candidates for being under positive selection. (B) The result of Mikania cordata. No outlier locus under selection is detected.
Percentage of polymorphic loci (PL), Nei's total gene diversity (H T), G, Φ, and θ obtained from the populations of different weedy species based on AFLP data.
| Species |
|
|
|
|
| Reference |
|
| 0.8455 | 0.32 | 0.18 | 0.22 | Geleta et al. | |
|
| 0.9002 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.17 | Geleta et al. | |
|
| 0.8393 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 0.26 | Geleta et al. | |
|
| 0.961 | 0.114 | 0.0549 | Bahulikar et al. | ||
|
| 0.549 | 0.435 | Nielsen | |||
|
| 0.8843 | 0.23 | Rottenberg & Parker | |||
|
| 0.9320 | 0.31 | Fjellheim & Rognli | |||
|
| 0.34 | 0.1808 | Haldimann et al. | |||
|
| 0.99 | Schönswetter et al. | ||||
|
| 0.8594 | 0.7442 | Paun et al. | |||
|
| 1.00 | 0.179 | 0.279 | 0.23 | Jørgensen & Mauricio | |
|
| 0.886 | Treuren et al. | ||||
|
| 0.905 | Menchari et al. | ||||
|
| 1.00 | 0.3376 | 0.4736 | 0.3335 | 0.2927 | This Study |
Invasive weed.