Literature DB >> 18493070

Impact of amplified fragment length polymorphism size homoplasy on the estimation of population genetic diversity and the detection of selective loci.

Armando Caballero1, Humberto Quesada, Emilio Rolán-Alvarez.   

Abstract

AFLP markers are becoming one of the most popular tools for genetic analysis in the fields of evolutionary genetics and ecology and conservation of genetic resources. The technique combines a high-information content and fidelity with the possibility of carrying out genomewide scans. However, a potential problem with this technique is the lack of homology of bands with the same electrophoretic mobility, what is known as fragment-size homoplasy. We carried out a theoretical analysis aimed at quantifying the impact of AFLP homoplasy on the estimation of within- and between-neutral population genetic diversity in a model of a structured finite population with migration among subpopulations. We also investigated the performance of a currently used method (DFDIST software) to detect selective loci from the comparison between genetic differentiation and heterozygosis of dominant molecular markers, as well as the impact of AFLP homoplasy on its effectiveness. The results indicate that the biases produced by homoplasy are: (1) an overestimation of the frequency of the allele determining the presence of the band, (2) an underestimation of the degree of differentiation between subpopulations, and (3) an overestimation or underestimation of the heterozygosis, depending on the allele frequency of the markers. The impact of homoplasy is quickly diminished by reducing the number of fragments analyzed per primer combination. However, substantial biases on the expected heterozygosity (up to 15-25%) may occur with approximately 50-100 fragments per primer combination. The performance of the DFDIST software to detect selective loci from dominant markers is highly dependent on the number of selective loci in the genome and their average effects, the estimate of genetic differentiation chosen to be used in the analysis, and the critical bound probability used to detect outliers. Overall, the results indicate that the software should be used with caution. AFLP homoplasy can produce a reduction of up to 15% in the power to detect selective loci.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18493070      PMCID: PMC2390631          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.107.083246

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  55 in total

1.  AFLP genotyping and fingerprinting.

Authors: 
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Estimating population structure in diploids with multilocus dominant DNA markers.

Authors:  L A Zhivotovsky
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  A simple method for the detection of size homoplasy among amplified fragment length polymorphism fragments.

Authors:  P C O'Hanlon; R Peakall
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.185

4.  SIMCOAL: a general coalescent program for the simulation of molecular data in interconnected populations with arbitrary demography.

Authors:  L Excoffier; J Novembre; S Schneider
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.645

5.  A physical amplified fragment-length polymorphism map of Arabidopsis.

Authors:  J L Peters; H Constandt; P Neyt; G Cnops; J Zethof; M Zabeau; T Gerats
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  A microsatellite-based multilocus screen for the identification of local selective sweeps.

Authors:  Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection.

Authors:  R Vitalis; K Dawson; P Boursot
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A method for estimating nucleotide diversity from AFLP data.

Authors:  H Innan; R Terauchi; G Kahl; F Tajima
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Data from amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers show indication of size homoplasy and of a relationship between degree of homoplasy and fragment size.

Authors:  X Vekemans; T Beauwens; M Lemaire; I Roldán-Ruiz
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  A draft sequence of the rice genome (Oryza sativa L. ssp. indica).

Authors:  Jun Yu; Songnian Hu; Jun Wang; Gane Ka-Shu Wong; Songgang Li; Bin Liu; Yajun Deng; Li Dai; Yan Zhou; Xiuqing Zhang; Mengliang Cao; Jing Liu; Jiandong Sun; Jiabin Tang; Yanjiong Chen; Xiaobing Huang; Wei Lin; Chen Ye; Wei Tong; Lijuan Cong; Jianing Geng; Yujun Han; Lin Li; Wei Li; Guangqiang Hu; Xiangang Huang; Wenjie Li; Jian Li; Zhanwei Liu; Long Li; Jianping Liu; Qiuhui Qi; Jinsong Liu; Li Li; Tao Li; Xuegang Wang; Hong Lu; Tingting Wu; Miao Zhu; Peixiang Ni; Hua Han; Wei Dong; Xiaoyu Ren; Xiaoli Feng; Peng Cui; Xianran Li; Hao Wang; Xin Xu; Wenxue Zhai; Zhao Xu; Jinsong Zhang; Sijie He; Jianguo Zhang; Jichen Xu; Kunlin Zhang; Xianwu Zheng; Jianhai Dong; Wanyong Zeng; Lin Tao; Jia Ye; Jun Tan; Xide Ren; Xuewei Chen; Jun He; Daofeng Liu; Wei Tian; Chaoguang Tian; Hongai Xia; Qiyu Bao; Gang Li; Hui Gao; Ting Cao; Juan Wang; Wenming Zhao; Ping Li; Wei Chen; Xudong Wang; Yong Zhang; Jianfei Hu; Jing Wang; Song Liu; Jian Yang; Guangyu Zhang; Yuqing Xiong; Zhijie Li; Long Mao; Chengshu Zhou; Zhen Zhu; Runsheng Chen; Bailin Hao; Weimou Zheng; Shouyi Chen; Wei Guo; Guojie Li; Siqi Liu; Ming Tao; Jian Wang; Lihuang Zhu; Longping Yuan; Huanming Yang
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-04-05       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  45 in total

1.  Identifying and reducing AFLP genotyping error: an example of tradeoffs when comparing population structure in broadcast spawning versus brooding oysters.

Authors:  H Zhang; M P Hare
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Natural epigenetic variation in the female great roundleaf bat (Hipposideros armiger) populations.

Authors:  Sen Liu; Keping Sun; Tinglei Jiang; Jennifer P Ho; Bao Liu; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2012-07-08       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 3.  What can patterns of differentiation across plant genomes tell us about adaptation and speciation?

Authors:  Jared L Strasburg; Natasha A Sherman; Kevin M Wright; Leonie C Moyle; John H Willis; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Population genomics and speciation.

Authors:  Roger K Butlin
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Gene-flow in a mosaic hybrid zone: is local introgression adaptive?

Authors:  Christelle Fraïsse; Camille Roux; John J Welch; Nicolas Bierne
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Challenges and pitfalls in the characterization of anonymous outlier AFLP markers in non-model species: lessons from an ocellated lizard genome scan.

Authors:  V L Nunes; M A Beaumont; R K Butlin; O S Paulo
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 3.821

7.  Amplified fragment length homoplasy: in silico analysis for model and non-model species.

Authors:  Margot Paris; Benjamin Bonnes; Gentile Francesco Ficetola; Bénédicte N Poncet; Laurence Després
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 8.  Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication.

Authors:  Ryan J Haasl; Bret A Payseur
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 6.185

9.  Homoplasy corrected estimation of genetic similarity from AFLP bands, and the effect of the number of bands on the precision of estimation.

Authors:  Gerrit Gort; Theo van Hintum; Fred van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Genome scan to assess the respective role of host-plant and environmental constraints on the adaptation of a widespread insect.

Authors:  Stéphanie Manel; Cyrille Conord; Laurence Després
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.