Literature DB >> 22826173

A conditional likelihood approach for regression analysis using biomarkers measured with batch-specific error.

Ming Wang1, W Dana Flanders, Roberd M Bostick, Qi Long.   

Abstract

Measurement error is common in epidemiological and biomedical studies. When biomarkers are measured in batches or groups, measurement error is potentially correlated within each batch or group. In regression analysis, most existing methods are not applicable in the presence of batch-specific measurement error in predictors. We propose a robust conditional likelihood approach to account for batch-specific error in predictors when batch effect is additive and the predominant source of error, which requires no assumptions on the distribution of measurement error. Although a regression model with batch as a categorical covariable yields the same parameter estimates as the proposed conditional likelihood approach for linear regression, this result does not hold in general for all generalized linear models, in particular, logistic regression. Our simulation studies show that the conditional likelihood approach achieves better finite sample performance than the regression calibration approach or a naive approach without adjustment for measurement error. In the case of logistic regression, our proposed approach is shown to also outperform the regression approach with batch as a categorical covariate. In addition, we also examine a 'hybrid' approach combining the conditional likelihood method and the regression calibration method, which is shown in simulations to achieve good performance in the presence of both batch-specific and measurement-specific errors. We illustrate our method by using data from a colorectal adenoma study.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22826173      PMCID: PMC3482310          DOI: 10.1002/sim.5473

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  6 in total

Review 1.  Laboratory issues: use of nutritional biomarkers.

Authors:  Heidi Michels Blanck; Barbara A Bowman; Gerald R Cooper; Gary L Myers; Dayton T Miller
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.798

2.  Analytic methods for two-stage case-control studies and other stratified designs.

Authors:  W D Flanders; S Greenland
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Robust statistical methods for analysis of biomarkers measured with batch/experiment-specific errors.

Authors:  Qi Long; W Dana Flanders; Veronika Fedirko; Roberd M Bostick
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Comparing methods for accounting for seasonal variability in a biomarker when only a single sample is available: insights from simulations based on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin d.

Authors:  Yiting Wang; Eric J Jacobs; Marjorie L McCullough; Carmen Rodriguez; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle; W Dana Flanders
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  TGF-alpha expression as a potential biomarker of risk within the normal-appearing colorectal mucosa of patients with and without incident sporadic adenoma.

Authors:  Carrie R Daniel; Roberd M Bostick; William Dana Flanders; Qi Long; Veronika Fedirko; Eduard Sidelnikov; March E Seabrook
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Effects of vitamin D and calcium supplementation on markers of apoptosis in normal colon mucosa: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Veronika Fedirko; Roberd M Bostick; W Dana Flanders; Qi Long; Aasma Shaukat; Robin E Rutherford; Carrie R Daniel; Vaunita Cohen; Chiranjeev Dash
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-03-03
  6 in total
  3 in total

1.  Association of hepatitis C with markers of hemostasis in HIV-infected and uninfected women in the women's interagency HIV study (WIHS).

Authors:  Elizabeth M Kiefer; Qiuhu Shi; Donald R Hoover; Robert Kaplan; Russell Tracy; Michael Augenbraun; Chenglong Liu; Marek Nowicki; Phyllis C Tien; Mardge Cohen; Elizabeth T Golub; Kathryn Anastos
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.731

2.  Combining Biomarker Calibration Data to Reduce Measurement Error.

Authors:  Neil J Perkins; Jennifer Weck; Sunni L Mumford; Lindsey A Sjaarda; Emily M Mitchell; Anna Z Pollack; Enrique F Schisterman
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  The Role of Conditional Likelihoods in Latent Variable Modeling.

Authors:  Anders Skrondal; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 2.290

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.