Literature DB >> 22825122

Effect of reduced vancomycin susceptibility on clinical and economic outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia.

Jennifer H Han1, Kara B Mascitti, Paul H Edelstein, Warren B Bilker, Ebbing Lautenbach.   

Abstract

Reduced vancomycin susceptibility (RVS) may lead to poor clinical outcomes in Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the clinical and economic impact of RVS in patients with bacteremia due to S. aureus. A cohort study of patients who were hospitalized from December 2007 to May 2009 with S. aureus bacteremia was conducted within a university health system. Multivariable logistic regression and zero-truncated negative binomial regression models were developed to evaluate the association of RVS with 30-day in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and hospital charges. One hundred thirty-four (34.2%) of a total of 392 patients had bacteremia due to S. aureus with RVS as defined by a vancomycin Etest MIC of >1.0 μg/ml. Adjusted risk factors for 30-day in-hospital mortality included the all patient refined-diagnosis related group (APRDRG) risk-of-mortality score (odds ratio [OR], 7.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.04 to 16.6), neutropenia (OR, 13.4; 95% CI, 2.46 to 73.1), white blood cell count (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.09), immunosuppression (OR, 6.31; 95% CI, 1.74 to 22.9), and intensive care unit location (OR, 3.51; 95% CI, 1.65 to 7.49). In multivariable analyses, RVS was significantly associated with increased mortality in patients with S. aureus bacteremia as a result of methicillin-susceptible (OR, 3.90; 95% CI, 1.07 to 14.2) but not methicillin-resistant (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.19 to 1.46) isolates. RVS was associated with greater 30-day in-hospital mortality in patients with bacteremia due to methicillin-susceptible S. aureus but not methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Further research is needed to identify optimal treatment strategies to reduce mortality associated with RVS in S. aureus bacteremia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22825122      PMCID: PMC3457402          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00757-12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  39 in total

1.  Paradoxical relationship between the clinical outcome of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia and the minimum inhibitory concentration of vancomycin.

Authors:  James Price; Stephen Atkinson; Martin Llewelyn; John Paul
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Comparison of detection methods for heteroresistant vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus, with the population analysis profile method as the reference method.

Authors:  Sarah W Satola; Monica M Farley; Karen F Anderson; Jean B Patel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Is high vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration a good marker to predict the outcome of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia?

Authors:  Antonio Lalueza; Fernando Chaves; Rafael San Juan; Maria Daskalaki; Joaquín R Otero; J M Aguado
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of america for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children.

Authors:  Catherine Liu; Arnold Bayer; Sara E Cosgrove; Robert S Daum; Scott K Fridkin; Rachel J Gorwitz; Sheldon L Kaplan; Adolf W Karchmer; Donald P Levine; Barbara E Murray; Michael J Rybak; David A Talan; Henry F Chambers
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Rising incidence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin and susceptibility to antibiotics: a global analysis 2004-2009.

Authors:  Stephen P Hawser; Samuel K Bouchillon; Daryl J Hoban; Michael Dowzicky; Tim Babinchak
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 5.283

6.  Underestimation of vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs by broth microdilution leads to underdetection of glycopeptide-intermediate isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Elzbieta Huggler; Louis Bernard; Tristan Ferry; Adriana Renzoni; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Increased mortality with accessory gene regulator (agr) dysfunction in Staphylococcus aureus among bacteremic patients.

Authors:  Marin L Schweizer; Jon P Furuno; George Sakoulas; J Kristie Johnson; Anthony D Harris; Michelle D Shardell; Jessina C McGregor; Kerri A Thom; Eli N Perencevich
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Predictors of persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in patients treated with vancomycin.

Authors:  Young Kyung Yoon; Jeong Yeon Kim; Dae Won Park; Jang Wook Sohn; Min Ja Kim
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 5.790

9.  Risk factors for fluconazole-resistant Candida glabrata bloodstream infections.

Authors:  Ingi Lee; Neil O Fishman; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Knashawn H Morales; Mark G Weiner; Marie Synnestvedt; Irving Nachamkin; Ebbing Lautenbach
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-02-23

10.  Nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia in Taiwan: mortality analyses and the impact of vancomycin, MIC = 2 mg/L, by the broth microdilution method.

Authors:  Jiun-Ling Wang; Jann-Tay Wang; Wang-Huei Sheng; Yee-Chun Chen; Shan-Chwen Chang
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  10 in total

1.  Impact of Time to Appropriate Therapy on Mortality in Patients with Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus Infection.

Authors:  Jason P Burnham; C A Burnham; David K Warren; Marin H Kollef
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Vancomycin MIC Does Not Predict 90-Day Mortality, Readmission, or Recurrence in a Prospective Cohort of Adults with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia.

Authors:  Sanjiv M Baxi; Angelo Clemenzi-Allen; Alice Gahbauer; Daniel Deck; Brandon Imp; Eric Vittinghoff; Henry F Chambers; Sarah Doernberg
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Effects of vancomycin versus nafcillin in enhancing killing of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus causing bacteremia by human cathelicidin LL-37.

Authors:  J Le; Q Dam; M Schweizer; W Thienphrapa; V Nizet; G Sakoulas
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Comparison of commercial antimicrobial susceptibility test methods for testing of Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococci against vancomycin, daptomycin, and linezolid.

Authors:  Stefan Riedel; Kar Mun Neoh; Stephen W Eisinger; Lisa M Dam; Tsigereda Tekle; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of human simulated exposures of ceftaroline and daptomycin against MRSA, hVISA, and VISA with and without prior vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Amira A Bhalodi; Mao Hagihara; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Is it time to replace vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections?

Authors:  Sebastiaan J van Hal; Vance G Fowler
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Protein-inspired antibiotics active against vancomycin- and daptomycin-resistant bacteria.

Authors:  Mark A T Blaskovich; Karl A Hansford; Yujing Gong; Mark S Butler; Craig Muldoon; Johnny X Huang; Soumya Ramu; Alberto B Silva; Mu Cheng; Angela M Kavanagh; Zyta Ziora; Rajaratnam Premraj; Fredrik Lindahl; Tanya A Bradford; June C Lee; Tomislav Karoli; Ruby Pelingon; David J Edwards; Maite Amado; Alysha G Elliott; Wanida Phetsang; Noor Huda Daud; Johan E Deecke; Hanna E Sidjabat; Sefetogi Ramaologa; Johannes Zuegg; Jason R Betley; Andrew P G Beevers; Richard A G Smith; Jason A Roberts; David L Paterson; Matthew A Cooper
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-01-02       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Discordance of vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at 2 μg/mL between Vitek II, E-test, and Broth Microdilution.

Authors:  Chien-Feng Kuo; Chon Fu Lio; Hsiang-Ting Chen; Yu-Ting Tina Wang; Kevin Sheng-Kai Ma; Yi Ting Chou; Fu-Chieh Chang; Shin-Yi Tsai
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Effect of the vancomycin minimum inhibitory concentration on clinical outcomes in patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Changcheng Shi; Jian Ye; Renjie Xu; Weizhong Jin; Shuang Xu; Fei Teng; Nengming Lin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Effects of pharmacist intervention in Vancomycin treatment for patients with bacteremia due to Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Atsushi Komoto; Takayoshi Maiguma; Daisuke Teshima; Tetsuhiro Sugiyama; Yuto Haruki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.