Literature DB >> 24371152

Improving computational efficiency and tractability of protein design using a piecemeal approach. A strategy for parallel and distributed protein design.

Derek J Pitman1, Christian D Schenkelberg1, Yao-Ming Huang2, Frank D Teets1, Daniel DiTursi1, Christopher Bystroff3.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Accuracy in protein design requires a fine-grained rotamer search, multiple backbone conformations, and a detailed energy function, creating a burden in runtime and memory requirements. A design task may be split into manageable pieces in both three-dimensional space and in the rotamer search space to produce small, fast jobs that are easily distributed. However, these jobs must overlap, presenting a problem in resolving conflicting solutions in the overlap regions.
RESULTS: Piecemeal design, in which the design space is split into overlapping regions and rotamer search spaces, accelerates the design process whether jobs are run in series or in parallel. Large jobs that cannot fit in memory were made possible by splitting. Accepting the consensus amino acid selection in conflict regions led to non-optimal choices. Instead, conflicts were resolved using a second pass, in which the split regions were re-combined and designed as one, producing results that were closer to optimal with a minimal increase in runtime over the consensus strategy. Splitting the search space at the rotamer level instead of at the amino acid level further improved the efficiency by reducing the search space in the second pass.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Programs for splitting protein design expressions are available at www.bioinfo.rpi.edu/tools/piecemeal.html CONTACT: bystrc@rpi.edu Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24371152      PMCID: PMC3982153          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt735

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  37 in total

1.  The penultimate rotamer library.

Authors:  S C Lovell; J M Word; J S Richardson; D C Richardson
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2000-08-15

Review 2.  Rotamer libraries in the 21st century.

Authors:  Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 3.  Theoretical and computational protein design.

Authors:  Ilan Samish; Christopher M MacDermaid; Jose Manuel Perez-Aguilar; Jeffery G Saven
Journal:  Annu Rev Phys Chem       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 12.703

4.  Improved Pruning algorithms and Divide-and-Conquer strategies for Dead-End Elimination, with application to protein design.

Authors:  Ivelin Georgiev; Ryan H Lilien; Bruce R Donald
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Quantitative in vivo solubility and reconstitution of truncated circular permutants of green fluorescent protein.

Authors:  Yao-Ming Huang; Sasmita Nayak; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Using substitution probabilities to improve position-specific scoring matrices.

Authors:  J G Henikoff; S Henikoff
Journal:  Comput Appl Biosci       Date:  1996-04

7.  A smoothed backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins derived from adaptive kernel density estimates and regressions.

Authors:  Maxim V Shapovalov; Roland L Dunbrack
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  Expanded explorations into the optimization of an energy function for protein design.

Authors:  Yao-Ming Huang; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  A de novo protein binding pair by computational design and directed evolution.

Authors:  John Karanicolas; Jacob E Corn; Irwin Chen; Lukasz A Joachimiak; Orly Dym; Sun H Peck; Shira Albeck; Tamar Unger; Wenxin Hu; Gaohua Liu; Scott Delbecq; Gaetano T Montelione; Clint P Spiegel; David R Liu; David Baker
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 17.970

10.  Computational de novo design and characterization of a four-helix bundle protein that selectively binds a nonbiological cofactor.

Authors:  Frank V Cochran; Sophia P Wu; Wei Wang; Vikas Nanda; Jeffery G Saven; Michael J Therien; William F DeGrado
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-02-09       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  3 in total

1.  Toward Computationally Designed Self-Reporting Biosensors Using Leave-One-Out Green Fluorescent Protein.

Authors:  Yao-Ming Huang; Shounak Banerjee; Donna E Crone; Christian D Schenkelberg; Derek J Pitman; Patrick M Buck; Christopher Bystroff
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.162

2.  Computational Feasibility of an Exhaustive Search of Side-Chain Conformations in Protein-Protein Docking.

Authors:  Taras Dauzhenka; Petras J Kundrotas; Ilya A Vakser
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 3.376

3.  An efficient parallel algorithm for accelerating computational protein design.

Authors:  Yichao Zhou; Wei Xu; Bruce R Donald; Jianyang Zeng
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 6.937

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.