BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hypertension remains a significant problem for many patients. Few interventions to improve patients' hypertension self-management have had lasting effects. Previous work has focused largely on patients' beliefs as predictors of behavior, but little is understood about beliefs as they are embedded in patients' social contexts. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore how patients' "explanatory models" of hypertension (understandings of the causes, mechanisms or pathophysiology, course of illness, symptoms and effects of treatment) and social context relate to their reported daily hypertension self-management behaviors. DESIGN: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a diverse group of patients at two large urban Veterans Administration Medical centers. PARTICIPANTS (OR PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS): African-American, white and Latino Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. APPROACH: We conducted thematic analysis using tools of grounded theory to identify key themes surrounding patients' explanatory models, social context and hypertension management behaviors. RESULTS: Patients' perceptions of the cause and course of hypertension, experiences of hypertension symptoms, and beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment were related to different hypertension self-management behaviors. Moreover, patients' daily-lived experiences, such as an isolated lifestyle, serious competing health problems, a lack of habits and routines, barriers to exercise and prioritizing lifestyle choices, also interfered with optimal hypertension self-management. CONCLUSIONS: Designing interventions to improve patients' hypertension self-management requires consideration of patients' explanatory models and their daily-lived experience. We propose a new conceptual model - the dynamic model of hypertension self-management behavior - which incorporates these key elements of patients' experiences.
BACKGROUND: Uncontrolled hypertension remains a significant problem for many patients. Few interventions to improve patients' hypertension self-management have had lasting effects. Previous work has focused largely on patients' beliefs as predictors of behavior, but little is understood about beliefs as they are embedded in patients' social contexts. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to explore how patients' "explanatory models" of hypertension (understandings of the causes, mechanisms or pathophysiology, course of illness, symptoms and effects of treatment) and social context relate to their reported daily hypertension self-management behaviors. DESIGN: Semi-structured qualitative interviews with a diverse group of patients at two large urban Veterans Administration Medical centers. PARTICIPANTS (OR PATIENTS OR SUBJECTS): African-American, white and Latino Veterans Affairs (VA) primary care patients with uncontrolled blood pressure. APPROACH: We conducted thematic analysis using tools of grounded theory to identify key themes surrounding patients' explanatory models, social context and hypertension management behaviors. RESULTS:Patients' perceptions of the cause and course of hypertension, experiences of hypertension symptoms, and beliefs about the effectiveness of treatment were related to different hypertension self-management behaviors. Moreover, patients' daily-lived experiences, such as an isolated lifestyle, serious competing health problems, a lack of habits and routines, barriers to exercise and prioritizing lifestyle choices, also interfered with optimal hypertension self-management. CONCLUSIONS: Designing interventions to improve patients' hypertension self-management requires consideration of patients' explanatory models and their daily-lived experience. We propose a new conceptual model - the dynamic model of hypertension self-management behavior - which incorporates these key elements of patients' experiences.
Authors: D R Berlowitz; A S Ash; E C Hickey; R H Friedman; M Glickman; B Kader; M A Moskowitz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-12-31 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Sheryl Catz; Paul A Fishman; Jennifer B McClure; Robert J Reid Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Christine M Gunn; Barbara Bokhour; Victoria A Parker; Patricia A Parker; Sarah Blakeslee; Hanna Bandos; Christine Holmberg Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2019 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 2.592
Authors: Heather M Johnson; Lisa Sullivan-Vedder; KyungMann Kim; Patrick E McBride; Maureen A Smith; Jamie N LaMantia; Jennifer T Fink; Megan R Knutson Sinaise; Laura M Zeller; Diane R Lauver Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-01-21 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: J D Purakal; J Williams-Johnson; E W Williams; S Pemba; J Kambona; R Welch; J Flack; P Levy Journal: West Indian Med J Date: 2014-06-11 Impact factor: 0.171
Authors: Nancy R Kressin; A Rani Elwy; Mark Glickman; Michelle B Orner; Gemmae M Fix; Ann M Borzecki; Lois A Katz; Dharma E Cortés; Ellen S Cohn; Anna Barker; Barbara G Bokhour Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2019-10-17 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Benjamin D Schalet; Steven P Reise; Donna M Zulman; Eleanor T Lewis; Rachel Kimerling Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2021-04-09 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Pablo Buitron de la Vega; Christopher Coe; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Jack A Clark; Katherine Waite; Maria Jose Sanchez; Emily Armstrong; Barbara G Bokhour Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-07-10 Impact factor: 5.128