Literature DB >> 20089868

Rotterdam AMblyopia screening effectiveness study: detection and causes of amblyopia in a large birth cohort.

Johanna H Groenewoud1, Angela M Tjiam, V Kathleen Lantau, W Christina Hoogeveen, Jan Tjeerd H N de Faber, Rikard E Juttmann, Harry J de Koning, Huibert J Simonsz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE. The Dutch population-based child health monitoring program includes regular preverbal (age range, 1-24 months) and preschool (age range, 36-72 months) vision screening. This study is on the contribution of an organized vision screening program to the detection of amblyopia. METHODS. A 7-year birth cohort study of 4624 children was started in 1996/1997 in Rotterdam. Vision screening data were obtained from the child screening centers. Treating orthoptists working at the regional ophthalmology departments provided information about diagnosis and treatment. The diagnosis was reviewed by two experts. The parents provided additional information on their child's eye history through written questionnaires and telephone interviews. At age 7 years, the children underwent a final examination by the study orthoptists. RESULTS. Of the 3897 children still living in Rotterdam by 2004, 2964 (76.1%) underwent the final examination. Amblyopia was diagnosed in 100 (3.4%) of these (95% CI, 2.7-4.0). At age 7, 23% had visual acuity >0.3 logMAR. Amblyopia was caused by refractive error (n = 42), strabismus (n = 19), combined-mechanism (n = 30), deprivation (n = 7), or unknown (n = 2). Eighty-three amblyopia cases had been detected before age 7. Amblyopia detection followed positive results in vision screening in 56 children, either preverbal (n = 15) or preschool (n = 41). Twenty-six other amblyopes were self-referred (n = 12, before a first positive screening test), especially strabismic or combined-mechanism amblyopia; data were uncertain for one other positively screened amblyopic child. Amblyopia remained undetected until age 7 due to unsuccessful referral (n = 4, three with visual acuity >0.3 logMAR at age 7) or false-negative screening (n = 13). CONCLUSIONS. Most cases of amblyopia were detected by vision screening with visual acuity measurement. Preverbal screening contributed little to the detection of refractive amblyopia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20089868     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-3352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  17 in total

1.  Randomised comparison of three tools for improving compliance with occlusion therapy: an educational cartoon story, a reward calendar, and an information leaflet for parents.

Authors:  A M Tjiam; G Holtslag; H M Van Minderhout; B Simonsz-Tóth; M H L Vermeulen-Jong; G J J M Borsboom; S E Loudon; H J Simonsz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07-22       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Amblyopia and binocular vision.

Authors:  Eileen E Birch
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Sociocultural and psychological determinants in migrants for noncompliance with occlusion therapy for amblyopia.

Authors:  Angela M Tjiam; Hilal Akcan; Fatma Ziylan; Elizabet Vukovic; Sjoukje E Loudon; Caspar W N Looman; Jan Passchier; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-03-12       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Effectiveness of routine population-wide orthoptic preschool vision screening tests at age 6-24 months in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Frea Sloot; Marieke Alberdina Johanna Telleman; Janine Benjamins; Aya Sami; Jacob Pieter Hoogendam; Huibert Jan Simonsz
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-04-04       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  A novel triage approach of child preventive health assessment: an observational study of routine registry-data.

Authors:  Janine Bezem; Meinou Theunissen; Simone E Buitendijk; Paul L Kocken
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Differences in quality-of-life dimensions of Adult Strabismus Quality of Life and Amblyopia & Strabismus Questionnaires.

Authors:  Elizabeth S van de Graaf; Gerard J J M Borsboom; Geertje W van der Sterre; Joost Felius; Huibert J Simonsz; Henk Kelderman
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Triage in preventive child healthcare: a prospective cohort study of care use and referral rates for children at risk.

Authors:  Janine Bezem; Paul L Kocken; Mascha Kamphuis; Meinou H C Theunissen; Simone E Buitendijk; Mattijs E Numans
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 8.  The prevalence of amblyopia in Iran: A systematic review.

Authors:  Maryam Chegeni; Narges Khanjani; Pardis Rahmatpour; Mahin Ahmadi Pishkuhi; Nafiseh Abdolalian
Journal:  J Curr Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-03-27

9.  Recommendation for ophthalmic care in German preschool health examination and its adherence: Results of the prospective cohort study ikidS.

Authors:  Alexander K Schuster; Heike M Elflein; Christiane Diefenbach; Christine Gräf; Jochem König; Martina F Schmidt; Kathleen Schnick-Vollmer; Michael S Urschitz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Patient-reported utilities in bilateral visual impairment from amblyopia and age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Elizabeth S van de Graaf; Dominiek D G Despriet; Caroline C W Klaver; Huibert J Simonsz
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 2.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.