Literature DB >> 22820527

How smart do biomaterials need to be? A translational science and clinical point of view.

Boris Michael Holzapfel1, Johannes Christian Reichert, Jan-Thorsten Schantz, Uwe Gbureck, Lars Rackwitz, Ulrich Nöth, Franz Jakob, Maximilian Rudert, Jürgen Groll, Dietmar Werner Hutmacher.   

Abstract

Over the last 4 decades innovations in biomaterials and medical technology have had a sustainable impact on the development of biopolymers, titanium/stainless steel and ceramics utilized in medical devices and implants. This progress was primarily driven by issues of biocompatibility and demands for enhanced mechanical performance of permanent and non-permanent implants as well as medical devices and artificial organs. In the 21st century, the biomaterials community aims to develop advanced medical devices and implants, to establish techniques to meet these requirements, and to facilitate the treatment of older as well as younger patient cohorts. The major advances in the last 10 years from a cellular and molecular knowledge point of view provided the scientific foundation for the development of third-generation biomaterials. With the introduction of new concepts in molecular biology in the 2000s and specifically advances in genomics and proteomics, a differentiated understanding of biocompatibility slowly evolved. These cell biological discoveries significantly affected the way of biomaterials design and use. At the same time both clinical demands and patient expectations continued to grow. Therefore, the development of cutting-edge treatment strategies that alleviate or at least delay the need of implants could open up new vistas. This represents the main challenge for the biomaterials community in the 21st century. As a result, the present decade has seen the emergence of the fourth generation of biomaterials, the so-called smart or biomimetic materials. A key challenge in designing smart biomaterials is to capture the degree of complexity needed to mimic the extracellular matrix (ECM) of natural tissue. We are still a long way from recreating the molecular architecture of the ECM one to one and the dynamic mechanisms by which information is revealed in the ECM proteins in response to challenges within the host environment. This special issue on smart biomaterials lists a large number of excellent review articles which core is to present and discuss the basic sciences on the topic of smart biomaterials. On the other hand, the purpose of our review is to assess state of the art and future perspectives of the so called "smart biomaterials" from a translational science and specifically clinical point of view. Our aim is to filter out and discuss which biomedical advances and innovations help us to achieve the objective to translate smart biomaterials from bench to bedside. The authors predict that analyzing the field of smart biomaterials from a clinical point of view, looking back 50 years from now, it will show that this is our heritage in the 21st century.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22820527     DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2012.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev        ISSN: 0169-409X            Impact factor:   15.470


  70 in total

1.  Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; E von Rottkay; D E Holzapfel; U Noeth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  A road map for a tissue engineering concept for restoring structure and function after limb loss.

Authors:  Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Customised osteotomy guides and endoprosthetic reconstruction for periacetabular tumours.

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Hakan Pilge; Peter Michael Prodinger; Andreas Toepfer; Susanne Mayer-Wagner; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Maximilian Rudert; Reiner Gradinger; Hans Rechl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  Biological strategies for improved osseointegration and osteoinduction of porous metal orthopedic implants.

Authors:  Eric Alexander Lewallen; Scott M Riester; Carolina A Bonin; Hilal Maradit Kremers; Amel Dudakovic; Sanjeev Kakar; Robert C Cohen; Jennifer J Westendorf; David G Lewallen; Andre J van Wijnen
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 6.389

Review 5.  The current state of scaffolds for musculoskeletal regenerative applications.

Authors:  Benjamin D Smith; Daniel A Grande
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 20.543

Review 6.  Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.

Authors:  Naoto Saito; Hisao Haniu; Yuki Usui; Kaoru Aoki; Kazuo Hara; Seiji Takanashi; Masayuki Shimizu; Nobuyo Narita; Masanori Okamoto; Shinsuke Kobayashi; Hiroki Nomura; Hiroyuki Kato; Naoyuki Nishimura; Seiichi Taruta; Morinobu Endo
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-04-10       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Innovating in the medical device industry - challenges & opportunities ESB 2015 translational research symposium.

Authors:  Y Bayon; M Bohner; D Eglin; P Procter; R G Richards; J Weber; D I Zeugolis
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 3.896

8.  Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 29.190

9.  Controlled release of an extract of Calendula officinalis flowers from a system based on the incorporation of gelatin-collagen microparticles into collagen I scaffolds: design and in vitro performance.

Authors:  Ronald A Jiménez; Diana Millán; Edward Suesca; Alejandro Sosnik; Marta R Fontanilla
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.617

Review 10.  "Looping In" Mechanics: Mechanobiologic Regulation of the Nucleus and the Epigenome.

Authors:  Eric N Dai; Su-Jin Heo; Robert L Mauck
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2020-04-14       Impact factor: 9.933

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.