Literature DB >> 22819433

Detection of previously undiagnosed atrial fibrillation in patients with stroke risk factors and usefulness of continuous monitoring in primary stroke prevention.

Paul D Ziegler1, Taya V Glotzer, Emile G Daoud, Daniel E Singer, Michael D Ezekowitz, Robert H Hoyt, Jodi L Koehler, James Coles, D George Wyse.   

Abstract

The detection of undiagnosed atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation (AT/AF) among patients with stroke risk factors could be useful for primary stroke prevention. We analyzed newly detected AT/AF (NDAF) using continuous monitoring in patients with stroke risk factors but without previous stroke or evidence of AT/AF. NDAF (AT/AF >5 minutes on any day) was determined in patients with implantable cardiac rhythm devices and ≥1 stroke risk factors (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, or diabetes). All devices were capable of continuously monitoring the daily cumulative time in AT/AF. Of 1,368 eligible patients, NDAF was identified in 416 (30%) during a follow-up of 1.1 ± 0.7 years and was unrelated to the CHADS(2) score (congestive heart failure, hypertension [blood pressure consistently >140/90 mm Hg or hypertension treated with medication], age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke or transient ischemic attack). The presence of AT/AF >6 hours on ≥1 day increased significantly with increased CHADS(2) scores and was present in 158 (54%) of 294 patients with NDAF and a CHADS(2) score of ≥2. NDAF was sporadic, and 78% of patients with a CHADS(2) score of ≥2 with NDAF experienced AT/AF on <10% of the follow-up days. The median interval to NDAF detection in these higher risk patients was 72 days (interquartile range 13 to 177). In conclusion, continuous monitoring identified NDAF in 30% of patients with stroke risk factors. In patients with NDAF, AT/AF occurred sporadically, highlighting the difficulty in detecting paroxysmal AT/AF using traditional monitoring methods. However, AT/AF also persisted for >6 hours on ≥1 days in most patients with NDAF and multiple stroke risk factors. Whether patients with CHADS(2) risk factors but without a history of AF might benefit from implantable monitors for the selection and administration of anticoagulation for primary stroke prevention merits additional investigation.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22819433     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.06.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  38 in total

1.  Clinical Reasoning: An 87-year-old woman with left-sided numbness.

Authors:  Shadi Yaghi; Mitchell S V Elkind
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Study of molecular events in cells by fluorescence correlation spectroscopy.

Authors:  V Vukojević; A Pramanik; T Yakovleva; R Rigler; L Terenius; G Bakalkin
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Prevalence of atrial fibrillation and the HATCH score: Intensified monitoring of patients with high HATCH score.

Authors:  Tina S Tischer; Ralph Schneider; Jörg Lauschke; Doreen Diedrich; Günther Kundt; Dietmar Bänsch
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 4.  Current rare indications and future directions for implantable loop recorders.

Authors:  Simon Wechselberger; Christopher Piorkowski; Matthias Pohl
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2016-12

5.  AF Detected on Implanted Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices: Is There a Threshold for Thromboembolic Risk?

Authors:  Motaz Baibars; Khalil Kanjwal; Joseph E Marine
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-03

6.  2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society.

Authors:  Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 7.  Silent atrial fibrillation: epidemiology, diagnosis, and clinical impact.

Authors:  Polychronis E Dilaveris; Harold L Kennedy
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Practice Current: What is your diagnostic evaluation of cryptogenic stroke?

Authors:  Luca Bartolini
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2016-06

Review 9.  Home Screening for Detecting Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Renato Pietro Ricci; Taya V Glotzer
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-12-31

10.  Evaluation Of Two Thromboembolism (TE) Risk Methods And Oral Anticoagulation Use Among Cardiac Device Patients With Atrial Tachyarrhythmias (AT).

Authors:  Heather S Kennedy; Theresa M Wadas; Gwenda Stewart Reyes; Manoj M Panday
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2014-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.