Heather S Kennedy1, Theresa M Wadas2, Gwenda Stewart Reyes3, Manoj M Panday4. 1. South Texas Veteran's Health Care System Nurse Practitioner, Arrhythmia Clinic 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX 78229. 2. Assistant Professor, University of Alabama, Capstone College of Nursing, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487. 3. Faculty Associate, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), San Antonio, TX 78229. 4. Assistant Professor of Medicine and Director of Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antoni(UTHSCSA), San Antonio, TX 78229.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In the implantable cardiac device (CD) population, not only can clinically silent atrial tachyarrythmias (AT) be detected, but an associated AT burden can be documented. There are two methods of determining stroke risk: CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc. Recommendations for initiating anticoagulation based on stroke risk profiles and/or AT burden remain unclear for device-detected AT. OBJECTIVE: Aims of this study were to reveal the AT burden among CD patients, determine CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores among patients with an AT burden, and evaluate current practices for anticoagulation. METHODS: Records were reviewed from patients undergoing a new CD implant within the last three years from two device clinics. Continuous variables were expressed as mean with standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables were stated as numbers and percentages. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi2 Square test and the continuous variables were compared using the independent 2-sided t-test. RESULTS: There were 275 CD patients enrolled. Eighty-seven had an AT burden and 188 patients did not have an AT burden. CD patients with AT burden were older than those without AT burden [69 (11), p=0.007]. Patients with AT burden had more hypertension and previous history of stroke (p=0.038, p=0.005) compared to those without AT burden. Both the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc mean scores were higher in patients with an AT burden (p=0.018 and p=0.041). Thirty patients with a previous history of AT were on anticoagulation (p=<0.001) prior to implant. Forty-eight patients had a new diagnosis of AT (NDAT) and 46% (n=22) were started on anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: An AT burden was detected in 32% of patients with at least 75% falling within a high-risk category using both scores. However, less than half of NDAT patients were started on anticoagulation. The use of oral anticoagulation in practice remains inconsistent and further randomized trials are recommended.
BACKGROUND: In the implantable cardiac device (CD) population, not only can clinically silent atrial tachyarrythmias (AT) be detected, but an associated AT burden can be documented. There are two methods of determining stroke risk: CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc. Recommendations for initiating anticoagulation based on stroke risk profiles and/or AT burden remain unclear for device-detected AT. OBJECTIVE: Aims of this study were to reveal the AT burden among CDpatients, determine CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc scores among patients with an AT burden, and evaluate current practices for anticoagulation. METHODS: Records were reviewed from patients undergoing a new CD implant within the last three years from two device clinics. Continuous variables were expressed as mean with standard deviation (SD) and categorical variables were stated as numbers and percentages. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi2 Square test and the continuous variables were compared using the independent 2-sided t-test. RESULTS: There were 275 CDpatients enrolled. Eighty-seven had an AT burden and 188 patients did not have an AT burden. CDpatients with AT burden were older than those without AT burden [69 (11), p=0.007]. Patients with AT burden had more hypertension and previous history of stroke (p=0.038, p=0.005) compared to those without AT burden. Both the CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc mean scores were higher in patients with an AT burden (p=0.018 and p=0.041). Thirty patients with a previous history of AT were on anticoagulation (p=<0.001) prior to implant. Forty-eight patients had a new diagnosis of AT (NDAT) and 46% (n=22) were started on anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: An AT burden was detected in 32% of patients with at least 75% falling within a high-risk category using both scores. However, less than half of NDAT patients were started on anticoagulation. The use of oral anticoagulation in practice remains inconsistent and further randomized trials are recommended.
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; Davis S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; G Neal Kay; Jean-Yves Le Huezey; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; L Samuel Wann Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2011-03-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Robby Nieuwlaat; Alessandro Capucci; Gregory Y H Lip; S Bertil Olsson; Martin H Prins; Fred H Nieman; José López-Sendón; Panos E Vardas; Etienne Aliot; Massimo Santini; Harry J G M Crijns Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2006-05-26 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Stefan H Hohnloser; Alessandro Capucci; Eric Fain; Michael R Gold; Isabelle C van Gelder; Jeff Healey; Carsten W Israel; Chu P Lau; Carlos Morillo; Stuart J Connolly Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Jeff S Healey; Stuart J Connolly; Michael R Gold; Carsten W Israel; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Alessandro Capucci; C P Lau; Eric Fain; Sean Yang; Christophe Bailleul; Carlos A Morillo; Mark Carlson; Ellison Themeles; Elizabeth S Kaufman; Stefan H Hohnloser Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2012-01-12 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; David S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; G Neal Kay; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; Samuel Wann; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffery L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; A John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap W Deckers; Catherine Despres; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; Joao Morais; Ady Osterspey; José Luis Zamorano Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Taya V Glotzer; Emile G Daoud; D George Wyse; Daniel E Singer; Michael D Ezekowitz; Christopher Hilker; Clayton Miller; Dongfeng Qi; Paul D Ziegler Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-08-04
Authors: Michael V Orlov; Jalal K Ghali; Mohsen Araghi-Niknam; Lou Sherfesee; Diane Sahr; Douglas A Hettrick Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 1.976