| Literature DB >> 22817642 |
Bradley F Boeve1, Neill R Graff-Radford2.
Abstract
Numerous kindreds with familial frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or both have been linked to chromosome 9 (c9FTD/ALS), and an expansion of the GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat in the non-coding region of chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) was identified in the summer of 2011 as the pathogenic mechanism. An avalanche of papers on this disorder is in progress, and a relatively distinctive phenotype is taking form. In this review, we present an illustrative case and summarize the demographic, inheritance, clinical, and behavioral aspects and presumed pathologic underpinnings of c9FTD/ALS on the basis of the available data on more than 250 patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration syndromes, parkinsonism, or ALS or a combination of these disorders.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22817642 PMCID: PMC3506943 DOI: 10.1186/alzrt132
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Alzheimers Res Ther Impact factor: 6.982
Figure 1Longitudinal cognitive, motor, functional, and neuropsychiatric data in an illustrative case in the VSM-20 kindred with c9FTD/ALS. (a) Graphs of longitudinal scores on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE) (maximum of 30) and Kokmen Short Test of Mental Status (STMS) (maximum of 36) of a patient from ages 50 to 57. (b) Global scores on the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale (maximum of 3) and CDR sum of the boxes (CDR-SOB) (maximum of 18) from ages 50 to 57. (c) Longitudinal summed scores for each assessment on the motor subtest of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) (maximum of 108) from ages 50 to 57. (d) Longitudinal scores and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) from ages 50 to 55. (At age 57, the patient was estranged from his wife.) The NPI-Present score represents the summed score for the presence (score = 1) or absence (score = 0) of each domain across the 12 domains (maximum of 12), and the NPI-Severity score represents the summed score for the severity rating by the informant (mild = 1, moderate = 2, and severe = 3) for each domain across the 12 domains (maximum of 36). Given that scores of less than 24 on the MMSE and of less than 29 on the STMS are viewed as abnormal, this patient has declined minimally on these screening/global measures of mental status. He has hovered in the very mild (0.5) to mild (1) range on the global CDR, whereas the CDR-SOB score shows the accumulating functional impairment across the six domains measured on the CDR. The UPDRS graph reflects that, at age 50, the patient had subtle parkinsonism that increased in severity through age 52 and that has registered scores of around 30 to 33 in the past five years. His parkinsonian features began as left hemiparkinsonism, which has since evolved to an asymmetric akinetic-rigid syndrome without tremor. None of his parkinsonian features responded to carbidopa-levodopa (750 mg of levodopa per day in divided doses). As reflected in the NPI graph, apathy, depression, and appetite/eating change have been confirmed by his wife to have been present throughout his course (he has gained more than 50 pounds over his illness due to hyperphagia), and the severity of most features has increased in recent years. The dips in frequency and severity on the NPI at age 52 may reflect the effects of quetiapine, which was commenced at age 51. However, despite upward titrations of this agent and many other pharmacologic adjustments, his neuropsychiatric morbidity continues to escalate. c9FTD/ALS, frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or both) linked to chromosome 9; VSM-20, Vancouver-San Francisco-Mayo Clinic family 20.
Figure 3Neuroimaging findings in an illustrative case in the VSM-20 kindred with c9FTD/ALS. (a) Axial fluid attenuation inversion recovery magnetic resonance images (top row) and coronal T1-weighted magnetic resonance images (bottom row) demonstrating the minimal atrophy in the frontal and temporal lobes at ages 50, 53, and 57. (b) Flourodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scan images of the brain at age 57. The color scheme on the left side of the set of images shows the relative degree of hypometabolism. Areas in black and blue are considered to be within normal limits, areas in green are considered mildly abnormal, areas in yellow are considered moderately abnormal, and areas in orange and red are considered markedly abnormal. Note the relatively mild and symmetric hypometabolism in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and cingulate cortices; this is remarkable given that this scan was performed eight years after the onset of symptoms. c9FTD/ALS, frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or both) linked to chromosome 9; VSM-20, Vancouver-San Francisco-Mayo Clinic family 20.
Key features of c9FTD/ALS due to the GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 across published series with ample numbers of cases with the FTD ± ALS phenotype
| Feature | Mayo Clinic | Mayo Clinic Brain Bank | Manchester | Vancouver | Dutch | London | Flanders Belgian | NIH/NINDS | Irish | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference in text | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | [ | |
| Cohort characteristics | ||||||||||
| Number of cases examined (with mutation) | 53 (63) | 13 (13) | 32 (32) | 30 (30) | 42 (42) | 19 (19) | 41 (41) | 4 (4) | 10 (10) | 254 |
| Number of kindreds identified | 43 | 20 | 32 | 16 | 37 | 18 | 25 | 4 | 39 | 234 |
| Percentage of all FTD ± ALS caes with mutation due to | 12/4/6 | NA | 8/0/0 | 55/24/NA | 9/7/10 | 7/7/6 | 8/7/1 | 8% for | 9% for | Most in 7%-12% range |
| Percentage of familial FTD ± cases with mutation due to | 20/6/11 | NA | ? | 70/30/NA | 18/14/22 | 13/14/14 | 26/22/4 | NA | NA | Most in 13%-26% range |
| Percentage of FTD cases not due to known genes | 66 | NA | ? | ? | 46 | 45 | 56 | NA | NA | 45%-66% range |
| Demographics | ||||||||||
| Males/Females | 33/30 | 8/5 | 18/14 | 21/8 | 20/22 | 11/8 | 8/7 | ? | 10/11 | 129/105 |
| Age of onset in years, mean or median | 52 | 65 | 58 | 54 | 57 | 55 | 55 | 58 | 56 | 52-65 range |
| Age of onset in years, range | 33-72 | 50-78 | 46-72 | 34-74 | 39-76 | 43-68 | 38-71 | ? | ? | 33-78 range |
| Survival in years, mean or median | 5 | 5 | ? | 5 | 7 | 9 | 5 | ? | ? | 5-9 range |
| Survival in years, range | 1-17 | 3-11 | 1-11 | 1-16 | 1-22 | 1-22 | 2-17 | ? | ? | 1-22 range |
| Inheritance | ||||||||||
| Inheritance pattern | AD | AD | AD | AD | AD | AD | AD | AD | AD | AD |
| Frequency of sporadic cases | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | + | ++ |
| Penetrance | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | High | High |
| Anticipation suggested | ++ | ? | ? | ++ | ? | ? | ? | + | ? | Many reports |
| Clinical phenotype | ||||||||||
| bvFTD phenotype | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | 0 | Frequent |
| ALS phenotype | ++ | NA | NA | ++ | ++ | NA | ++ | 0 | +++ | Often |
| FTD/ALS phenotype | ++ | 0 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | Often |
| Primary parkinsonian phenotype | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | None reported |
| Non-fluent/agrammatic subtype of PPA | 0 | 0 | + | ++ | ++ | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | Rare |
| Semantic subtype of PPA | 0 | 0 | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Rare |
| Corticobasal syndrome phenotype | 0 | 0 | NA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | None reported |
| Alzheimer's disease-like phenotype | + | ++ | NA | + | 0 | + | 0 | 0 | 0 | Rare |
| Cognitive features | ||||||||||
| Memory impairment | ++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | ? | ? | 0 | Often to frequent |
| Executive functioning impairment | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | +++ | Presumably | Presumably | ++ | Frequent |
| Language impairment (aphasia) | ++ | ++ | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | ? | ? | 0 | Frequent and usually late feature |
| Visuospatial impairment | + | ? | + | + | + | + | ? | ? | ? | Rare |
| Neuropsychological profile of executive/generation deficits with relative sparing of memory and visuospatial functions | ++ | Presumably in some | ++ | ++ | ? | ++ | Presumably in many | Presumably in many | ++ | Often but certainly not frequent |
| Behavioral features | ||||||||||
| Early behavioral disinhibition | +++ | Presumably | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | Presumably | Presumably | Presumably | Frequent |
| Early apathy or inertia | +++ | Presumably | +++ | +++ | ++ | +++ | Presumably | Presumably | Presumably | Frequent |
| Early loss of sympathy or empathy | +++ | Presumably | +++ | +++ | ? | ++ | Presumably | Presumably | Presumably | Frequent |
| Hyperorality and dietary changes | +++ | Presumably | +++ | ? | ? | +++ | Presumably | Presumably | Presumably | Frequent |
| Pseudobulbar affect | + | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | Insufficient data |
| Psychosis (delusions or hallucinations) | ++ | ? | ++ | + | + | ++ | ? | ? | ? | Often |
| Other clinical features | ||||||||||
| Frontal release signs | ++ | ? | ++ | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | Insufficient data |
| Parkinsonism | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ? | ++ | ? | ? | ? | Often |
| Upper or lower (or both) motor neuron dysfunction not fulfilling ALS criteria | ++ | ? | + | ++ | ? | +++ | ? | ? | ? | Often |
| ALS | ++ | 0 | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | ++ | 0 | +++ | Often in FTD |
| Limb apraxia | 0 | ? | 0 | + | + | 0 | ? | ? | ? | Rare |
The Manchester series only included cases with a frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum dementia syndrome and not amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) or parkinsonism. In the Vancouver series, cases of FTD or ALS or both had progressive non-fluent aphasia plus frontal features and ALS. The percent breakdowns of chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) and progranulin (PGRN) are based on autopsied cases with TDP-43+ pathology, not all FTD cases. The Irish series involved mostly ALS cases, of which 10 had FTD or ALS or both. 0, feature reported as not present; +, feature reported as present infrequently (<10% of cases); ++, feature reported as often present (10% to 50% of cases); +++, feature reported as frequently present (>50% of cases); ?, feature not discussed sufficiently in the report to make any determinations. AD, Alzheimer's disease; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; c9FTD/ALS, frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or both) linked to chromosome 9; GGGGCC, (the hexanucleotide expansion of) guanine-guanine-guanine-guanine-cytosine-cytosine; MAPT, microtubule-associated protein tau; NA, not applicable; NIH/NINDS, National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; PPA, primary progressive aphasia.
Descriptions of dramatic behavioral manifestations associated with c9FTD/ALS
| Delusions |
| • The patient believed that others were spying on her and required all blinds to be closed in the home and doors to be locked. |
| • The patient believed that pieces of plastic were emanating from his head, leading him to pick repetitively at his scalp to remove the 'plastic bits' embedded in his skin. |
| • The patient believed that someone was about to harm her and carried a knife and pistol for self-defense. |
| • The patient believed he had a weakness of the gluteal muscles and that he therefore had to keep his finger in his anus to prevent incontinence. |
| • The patient believed that he was under surveillance. |
| • The patient believed that he was infested by mites, which crawled under his skin and into his extremities. He reported that the mites congregated in his earlobe and that he could reduce their number by pinching his earlobe at regular 10-minute intervals. |
| • The patient believed that his son was trying to kill him, so the patient barricaded himself in his home. |
| • The patient believed he was being contacted by letter or phone by dead friends and hatched plans to meet them. |
| • The patient believed that characters on the television screen were communicating with her. |
| • The patient believed that someone's wife was trying to harm him and threatened to shoot her. |
| • The patient believed that people around him and on the television screen were talking about him and calling him names. |
| Hallucinations |
| • The patient had visions of the devil. |
| • The patient heard the voice of God. |
| • The patient perceived that men, including a man dressed in a gorilla outfit, were hiding in her garden and saw disembodied faces, which she believed to be spirits. As a result, the police were contacted. |
| Other |
| • The patient sat in the yard, held rifles in both arms, and 'shot anything that moved' (illustrative case). |
| • The patient spoke in a high-pitched and child-like voice and behaved as if she was a child. |
| • The patient underwent a dramatic change in religious beliefs and arranged ritualistic and candle-lit meetings with spirits. |
| • The patient felt the need to carry a handgun in her purse. When her husband hid the gun, she proceeded to purchase another (and was able to do so without raising the suspicion of the gunshop owner). |
| • The patient threw lit fireworks though his neighbor's letterbox. |
| • The patient complained of excessive heat. He threw open doors and windows, refused to allow any heating in the home, and dressed in summer attire in mid-winter. He took to pouring cold water over tepid food to 'cool it down'. |
| • The patient combed his hair repetitively and vigorously, leading to bleeding of the scalp. The patient wore multiple watches on his arm and donned clothes on the wrong part of his body (for example, trousers on his head and underpants on his arms). He used objects inappropriately (for example, a spoon to clean his teeth and a toilet brush to brush his hair). |
| • The patient constantly wiped surfaces and washed pots and carried with him a cloth to wipe his shoes before getting into his car and plastic bags to wipe his hands. |
| • The patient washed his hands, filed his nails, and combed his hair repetitively and drank excessive quantities of water as a remedy for her symptoms, leading to hyponatremia. |
| • The patient cleaned the house obsessively and followed his dog around, cleaning the surfaces that it had walked on. |
Examples were compiled from the clinical series of the authors [21] and that of Snowden and colleagues [28]. c9FTD/ALS, frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or both) linked to chromosome 9.
Salient features of the FTD-predominant phenotype of c9FTD/ALS due to the GGGGCC hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72
| Frequency |
| • The mutation is as frequent as or more frequent than microtubule-associated protein tau ( |
| Demographics |
| • There is a slight male predominance. |
| • Age of onset is between 33 and 78, and most patients present in the 40- to 70-year age range. |
| • Survival is variable but typically is in the 5- to 9-year range. |
| • Survival is shorter when the ALS phenotype is present. |
| Inheritance |
| • Inheritance is autosomal dominant. |
| • Many examples of incomplete penetrance exist. |
| • Sporadic cases clearly exist. |
| • Some kindreds appear to exhibit an anticipation-like phenomenon. |
| Clinical phenotype |
| • The characteristic phenotype is bvFTD ± parkinsonism ± ALS. |
| • The primary progressive aphasia and Alzheimer's disease-dementia phenotypes are uncommon but do exist. |
| • The primary parkinsonism and corticobasal syndrome phenotypes are rare to nonexistent. |
| Cognitive features |
| • Executive dysfunction is very common, as would be expected in an FTD-spectrum disorder, but the underlying substrate for this cognitive feature is not fully understood in those with no frontotemporal changes on neuroimaging studies. |
| • Memory impairment is frequent, but the underlying substrate for this is not fully understood. |
| • Aphasia is frequent but is typically a manifestation as the disease evolves after the predominant bvFTD phenotype. The underlying substrate for aphasia in not fully understood. |
| • Visuospatial dysfunction in uncommon, but in view of the known parietal atrophy and hypometabolism in such cases, this feature is adequately explained. |
| • Because memory dysfunction or visuospatial dysfunction or both are present in many cases with c9FTD/ALS, such cases will not fulfill the neuropsychological criterion for bvFTD. |
| Behavioral features |
| • Almost all cases with a dementia phenotype have early behavioral disinhibition, early apathy or inertia, early loss of sympathy or empathy, and hyperorality and dietary changes and thus fulfill the bvFTD behavioral criteria. |
| • Psychosis and other dramatic/bizarre behavior changes can occur. |
| • The underlying substrate for the bvFTD features in those with minimal or no frontotemporal changes on neuroimaging studies is poorly understood. |
| Other clinical features |
| • Many with the bvFTD-predominant phenotype have evidence of parkinsonism or upper or lower motor neuron involvement or a combination of the three. |
ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; c9FTD/ALS, frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or both) linked to chromosome 9; C9ORF72, (gene encoding the mutation in) chromosome 9 open reading frame 72; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; GGGGCC, (the hexanucleotide expansion of) guanine-guanine-guanine-guanine-cytosine-cytosine.
Clues that should alert clinicians to suspect the hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 in individual patients
| Demographics |
| • Age of onset in the 30- to 70-year age range |
| Inheritance |
| • Apparent autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance of dementia or ALS or botha |
| Clinical phenotype |
| • Presence of the phenotype of bvFTD ± parkinsonism ± ALS in the patient and his or her relativesa |
| • Absence of any of the focal/asymmetric focal cortical degenerative syndromes (for example, primary progressive aphasia and corticobasal syndrome) in the patient and his or her relativesa |
| Cognitive/Neuropsychological features |
| • Presence of executive dysfunction and word retrieval deficitsa |
| • The presence of memory impairment or visuospatial impairment or both should not dissuade the suspicion of the mutation if many other clues are present. |
| • Normal or minimally abnormal performance on neuropsychological tests early in the course of behavioral changes should not dissuade the suspicion of the mutation if many other clues are present. |
| Behavioral features |
| • Presence of the 'classic bvFTD features' in the patient, including behavioral disinhibition, early apathy or inertia, early loss of sympathy or empathy, and hyperorality and dietary changesa |
| • Presence of psychosis and other dramatic/bizarre behavior changes in the patient ± his or her relatives |
| Neuroimaging features |
| • Presence of symmetric bilateral frontal (often mesial more so than dorsolateral) ± temporal ± parietal atrophy or hypometabolisma |
| • Normal or minimally abnormal neuroimaging findings early in the course of behavioral changes should not dissuade the suspicion of the mutation if many other clues are present. |
| Neuropathologic features |
| • Presence of TDP-43-, ubiquitin-, ubiquilin-, and p62-positive inclusions in the cerebellum in the patient or any of his or her relativesa |
aThis feature is a primary clue for considering the C9ORF72 mutation. ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; C9ORF72, (gene encoding the mutation in) chromosome 9 open reading frame 72.
Issues worthy of further study in c9FTD/ALS
| Demographic and inheritance issues |
| • Is there a slight male predominance in the dementia-predominant phenotype of c9FTD/ALS? If so, why? |
| • Is the |
| • Why are there such variable ages of onset and durations of disease across affected individuals? |
| • Does genetic anticipation occur in c9FTD/ALS? If so, does the age of onset decrease as the expansion repeat number increases? |
| • What explains incomplete penetrance in some families? |
| • What is the mechanism for explaining sporadic cases? |
| Clinical phenotype |
| • Why are the bvFTD or ALS phenotypes or both so consistently expressed? |
| • Why are the syndromes of primary progressive aphasia, corticobasal syndrome, and primary parkinsonism so uncommon in the |
| • Does the hexanucleotide repeat length impact the topography of degeneration and therefore the phenotype? |
| Cognitive features |
| • What is the underlying substrate for executive dysfunction and word retrieval impairment in those with no frontotemporal changes on neuroimaging studies? Does cerebellar dysfunction contribute to the 'frontal' cognitive features? |
| • What are the qualitative features of memory impairment on neuropsychological assessment? |
| • What is the underlying substrate for memory impairment in those with no frontotemporal changes on neuroimaging studies? |
| • What is the underlying substrate for aphasia, particularly in those with no frontotemporal changes on neuroimaging studies? |
| • How will c9FTD/ALS cases be viewed for experimental drug trial participation if they do not meet the neuropsychological profile criteria of bvFTD? |
| Behavioral features |
| • Why are psychosis and other dramatic/bizarre behavior changes relatively common in c9FTD/ALS? What is the underlying substrate for these behavioral features? |
| • What is the underlying substrate for the prominent behavioral features in those with minimal or no frontotemporal changes on neuroimaging studies? Does cerebellar dysfunction contribute to these prominent behavioral features? |
ALS, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; bvFTD, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia; c9FTD/ALS, frontotemporal dementia or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (or both) linked to chromosome 9; C9ORF72, (gene encoding the mutation in) chromosome 9 open reading frame 72.