Literature DB >> 22817381

Preprocedural ventricular rate predicts subsequent sick sinus syndrome after ablation for long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.

Masaharu Masuda1, Koichi Inoue, Katsuomi Iwakura, Atsunori Okamura, Yasushi Koyama, Ryusuke Kimura, Yuko Toyoshima, Atsushi Doi, Yohei Sotomi, Issei Komuro, Kenshi Fujii.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concealed sick sinus syndrome may become manifest after restoration of sinus rhythm by ablation in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the preprocedural ventricular rate during AF and sinus node function in patients with long-standing persistent AF.
METHODS: Consecutive patients (n = 102) who underwent ablation for long-standing persistent AF were enrolled. We measured the ventricular rate during AF before ablation in the absence of antiarrhythmic drugs. Sinus node function was assessed by electrophysiological study and serial Holter recordings after ablation.
RESULTS: Patients in the lowest quartile of ventricular rate during AF had longer corrected sinus node recovery time (1.06 ± 1.39 seconds) than those in the other quartiles (0.54 ± 0.31 seconds; P = 0.006) and lower mean heart rate on 24-hour Holter recording 3 months after ablation (68 ± 9 beats/min vs 75 ± 10 beats/min, P = 0.01). During a mean follow-up of 23 ± 10 months, sick sinus syndrome necessitating permanent pacemaker implantation developed in five (5%) patients, and multivariate analysis revealed that a low ventricular rate during AF rate was an independent risk factor for sick sinus syndrome (odds ratio = 0.90 for a 1 beat/min increase in AF rate, P = 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: A low preprocedural ventricular rate during AF indicates the existence of sinus node dysfunction after restoration of sinus rhythm by ablation in patients with long-standing persistent AF. ©2012, The Authors. Journal compilation ©2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22817381     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03477.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  4 in total

1.  A low fibrillatory wave amplitude predicts sinus node dysfunction after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Akihiro Sunaga; Masaharu Masuda; Takashi Kanda; Masashi Fujita; Osamu Iida; Shin Okamoto; Takayuki Ishihara; Yasuhiro Matsuda; Tetsuya Watanabe; Yasushi Sakata; Masaaki Uematsu
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 1.900

2.  The incidence, indications and predictors of acute pacemaker implantation after ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Verena Semmler; Felix von Krogh; Bernhard Haller; Tilko Reents; Felix Bourier; Marta Telishevska; Marc Kottmaier; Marielouise Kornmayer; Stephanie Brooks; Katharina Koch-Büttner; Carsten Lennerz; Amir Brkic; Christian Grebmer; Patrick Blazek; Severin Weigand; Gabriele Hessling; Christof Kolb; Isabel Deisenhofer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 5.460

3.  Sinus Node Dysfunction after Successful Atrial Flutter Ablation during Follow-Up: Clinical Characteristics and Predictors.

Authors:  Guan-Yi Li; Fa-Po Chung; Tze-Fan Chao; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Jo-Nan Liao; Ting-Yung Chang; Ling Kuo; Cheng-I Wu; Chih-Min Liu; Shin-Huei Liu; Wen-Han Cheng; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  Sudden manifestation of sinus arrest nine months after catheter ablation treatment for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Masateru Takigawa; Taishi Kuwahara; Kenji Okubo; Atsushi Takahashi
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2015-03-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.