Literature DB >> 26003808

A low fibrillatory wave amplitude predicts sinus node dysfunction after catheter ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.

Akihiro Sunaga1, Masaharu Masuda, Takashi Kanda, Masashi Fujita, Osamu Iida, Shin Okamoto, Takayuki Ishihara, Yasuhiro Matsuda, Tetsuya Watanabe, Yasushi Sakata, Masaaki Uematsu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concealed sinus node dysfunction (SND) may become manifest after restoration of sinus rhythm by ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictors of SND after catheter ablation of persistent AF.
METHODS: Two hundred two consecutive patients who underwent ablation for persistent AF were enrolled. Ipsilateral pulmonary vein isolation followed by, if necessary, electrical cardioversion were performed in all patients. SND was defined when temporary and/or permanent pacemakers were needed due to sinus bradycardia after ablation.
RESULTS: SND developed in 12 (5.9 %) patients. There was no difference between the patients with and without SND in terms of the age (with SND, 67 ± 9 and without, 66 ± 10 years old, P = 0.599) and sex (male; 58 vs. 79 %, P = 0.186). However, the patients with SND had a lower amplitude of the fibrillatory waves (0.115 ± 0.086 vs. 0.176 ± 0.077 mV, P = 0.009) and larger left atrial volume index (LAVI; 66 ± 31 vs. 34 ± 13, P = 0.007) than those without. A receiver operating characteristic curve identified a fibrillatory wave amplitude of 0.145 mV (AUC = 0.742; sensitivity = 65 %; specificity = 83 %) and LAVI of 47.5 ml/m(2) (AUC = 0.837; sensitivity = 82 %; specificity = 87 %) as the optimal cutoff values for predicting SND. A multivariate analysis revealed that the amplitude of the fibrillatory waves (odds ratio = 0.84 for 0.010 mV increase, 95 % CI = 0.71-0.98, P = 0.031) and LAVI (odds ratio = 1.08 for 1.0 cm(3)/m(2) increase, 95 % CI = 1.04-1.12, P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for SND.
CONCLUSIONS: A low amplitude of the fibrillatory waves and a large LAVI were predictors of SND after restoration of sinus rhythm by ablation in patients with persistent AF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26003808     DOI: 10.1007/s10840-015-0017-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1383-875X            Impact factor:   1.900


  20 in total

Review 1.  New insights into pacemaker activity: promoting understanding of sick sinus syndrome.

Authors:  Halina Dobrzynski; Mark R Boyett; Robert H Anderson
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-04-10       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Catheter ablation of long-lasting persistent atrial fibrillation: clinical outcome and mechanisms of subsequent arrhythmias.

Authors:  Michel Haïssaguerre; Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Frederic Sacher; Martin Rotter; Yoshihide Takahashi; Thomas Rostock; Li-Fern Hsu; Pierre Bordachar; Sylvain Reuter; Raymond Roudaut; Jacques Clémenty; Pierre Jaïs
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-11

3.  The sick sinus syndrome in atrial disease.

Authors:  M I Ferrer
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1968-10-14       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Sinus pacemaker function after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: is sinus node remodeling related with recurrence?

Authors:  E G Manios; E M Kanoupakis; H E Mavrakis; E M Kallergis; D N Dermitzaki; P E Vardas
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-07

Review 5.  Outcomes of long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anthony G Brooks; Martin K Stiles; Julien Laborderie; Dennis H Lau; Pawel Kuklik; Nicholas J Shipp; Li-Fern Hsu; Prashanthan Sanders
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 6.343

6.  Pulmonary veins branching pattern, assessed by magnetic resonance, does not affect transcatheter atrial fibrillation ablation outcome.

Authors:  Matteo Anselmino; Marco Scaglione; Alessandro Blandino; Serena Beninati; Domenico Caponi; Carlo Boffano; Antonio Montefusco; Federico Cesarani; Fiorenzo Gaita
Journal:  Acta Cardiol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  Fibrillatory wave amplitude as a marker of left atrial and left atrial appendage function, and a predictor of thromboembolic risk in patients with rheumatic mitral stenosis.

Authors:  Bülent Mutlu; Mustafa Karabulut; Elif Eroglu; Kürsat Tigen; Fatih Bayrak; Hakan Fotbolcu; Yelda Basaran
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.164

8.  Coexistence of sick sinus rhythm and atrial flutter-fibrillation.

Authors:  J A Gomes; P S Kang; M Matheson; W B Gough; N El-Sherif
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Electrophysiological properties in chronic lone atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  K Kumagai; S Akimitsu; K Kawahira; F Kawanami; Y Yamanouchi; T Hiroki; K Arakawa
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Reverse remodeling of sinus node function after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with prolonged sinus pauses.

Authors:  Mélèze Hocini; Prashanthan Sanders; Isabel Deisenhofer; Pierre Jaïs; Li-Fern Hsu; Christophe Scavée; Rukshen Weerasoriya; Florence Raybaud; Laurent Macle; Dipen C Shah; Stéphane Garrigue; Philippe Le Metayer; Jacques Clémenty; Michel Haïssaguerre
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-09-02       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  1 in total

1.  Sinus Node Dysfunction after Successful Atrial Flutter Ablation during Follow-Up: Clinical Characteristics and Predictors.

Authors:  Guan-Yi Li; Fa-Po Chung; Tze-Fan Chao; Yenn-Jiang Lin; Shih-Lin Chang; Li-Wei Lo; Yu-Feng Hu; Ta-Chuan Tuan; Jo-Nan Liao; Ting-Yung Chang; Ling Kuo; Cheng-I Wu; Chih-Min Liu; Shin-Huei Liu; Wen-Han Cheng; Shih-Ann Chen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 4.964

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.