INTRODUCTION: Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease. We sought to determine the incidence, indications and predictors of acute pacemaker [PM] implantation within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients, who had had an ablation of persistent AF at our center. Between 01/2011 and 08/2016, 1234 patients (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 66.7% male) without prior PM implantation underwent an ablation of persistent AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 1158 (93.8%), the additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in 1109 (89.9%) and linear ablation in 524 (42.5%) patients. Temporary cardiac pacing was necessary in 27 (2.2%) patients. The temporary PM was removed in 15 patients (1.2%) because sinus node recovered after a median of 1.0 (minimum 0.1-maximum 2.0) day. The remaining 12 (1.0%) patients required the implantation of a permanent PM. Another 13 (1.1%) patients required permanent PM implantation without prior temporary pacing. In a multivariable regression model, age [OR 1.07 (1.02-1.12), p = 0.006], sinus pauses prior to ablation [OR 7.97 (2.36-26.88), p = 0.001] and atria with low voltage [OR 2.83 (1.31-6.11), p = 0.008] were identified as significant predictors for acute cardiac pacing. CONCLUSION: Acute cardiac pacing within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF was necessary in 40 (3.2%) patients. Age, sinus pauses in history prior to ablation and the existence of low-voltage areas in the atria were identified as relevant risk factors.
INTRODUCTION:Patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may additionally suffer from a concealed sinus node disease. We sought to determine the incidence, indications and predictors of acute pacemaker [PM] implantation within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients, who had had an ablation of persistent AF at our center. Between 01/2011 and 08/2016, 1234 patients (mean age 65 ± 10 years, 66.7% male) without prior PM implantation underwent an ablation of persistent AF. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was performed in 1158 (93.8%), the additional ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAE) in 1109 (89.9%) and linear ablation in 524 (42.5%) patients. Temporary cardiac pacing was necessary in 27 (2.2%) patients. The temporary PM was removed in 15 patients (1.2%) because sinus node recovered after a median of 1.0 (minimum 0.1-maximum 2.0) day. The remaining 12 (1.0%) patients required the implantation of a permanent PM. Another 13 (1.1%) patients required permanent PM implantation without prior temporary pacing. In a multivariable regression model, age [OR 1.07 (1.02-1.12), p = 0.006], sinus pauses prior to ablation [OR 7.97 (2.36-26.88), p = 0.001] and atria with low voltage [OR 2.83 (1.31-6.11), p = 0.008] were identified as significant predictors for acute cardiac pacing. CONCLUSION: Acute cardiac pacing within 1 week after the ablation of persistent AF was necessary in 40 (3.2%) patients. Age, sinus pauses in history prior to ablation and the existence of low-voltage areas in the atria were identified as relevant risk factors.
Authors: Daniel Steven; Arian Sultan; Benjamin Schäffer; Helge Servatius; Boris Hoffmann; Jakob Lüker; Stephan Willems Journal: Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Date: 2013-04-30
Authors: Pasquale Santangeli; Luigi Di Biase; David J Burkhardt; Rodney Horton; Javier Sanchez; Rong Bai; Agnes Pump; Marco Perez; Paul J Wang; Andrea Natale; Amin Al-Ahmad Journal: J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 2.160
Authors: Gang Chen; Jian Zeng Dong; Xing Peng Liu; Xin Yong Zhang; De Yong Long; Cai Hua Sang; Man Ning; Ri Bo Tang; Chen Xi Jiang; Chang Sheng Ma Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: A John Camm; Paulus Kirchhof; Gregory Y H Lip; Ulrich Schotten; Irene Savelieva; Sabine Ernst; Isabelle C Van Gelder; Nawwar Al-Attar; Gerhard Hindricks; Bernard Prendergast; Hein Heidbuchel; Ottavio Alfieri; Annalisa Angelini; Dan Atar; Paolo Colonna; Raffaele De Caterina; Johan De Sutter; Andreas Goette; Bulent Gorenek; Magnus Heldal; Stefan H Hohloser; Philippe Kolh; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; Piotr Ponikowski; Frans H Rutten Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2010-08-29 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Yaariv Khaykin; Nassir F Marrouche; David O Martin; Walid Saliba; Robert Schweikert; Mark Wexman; Brian Strunk; Salwa Beheiry; Eduardo Saad; Mandeep Bhargava; J David Burkhardt; George Joseph; Patrick Tchou; Andrea Natale Journal: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol Date: 2004-07
Authors: Linghe Wu; R W Emmens; J van Wezenbeek; W Stooker; C P Allaart; A B A Vonk; A C van Rossum; H W M Niessen; P A J Krijnen Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-02-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Lara Wagner; Fabrice F Darche; Dierk Thomas; Patrick Lugenbiel; Panagiotis Xynogalos; Svenja Seide; Eberhard P Scholz; Hugo A Katus; Patrick A Schweizer Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-05-13 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Ann-Kathrin Rahm; Patrick Lugenbiel; Marco Ochs; Benjamin Meder; Dierk Thomas; Hugo A Katus; Eberhard Scholz Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2020-03-06 Impact factor: 5.460