Literature DB >> 22816536

Multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial: reduce inappropriate therapy (MADIT-RIT): background, rationale, and clinical protocol.

Claudio Schuger1, James P Daubert, Mary W Brown, David Cannom, N A Mark Estes, W Jackson Hall, Torsten Kayser, Helmut Klein, Brian Olshansky, Keith A Power, David Wilber, Wojciech Zareba, Arthur J Moss.   

Abstract

The implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is highly effective in reducing mortality due to cardiac arrhythmias in high-risk cardiac patients. However, inappropriate therapies caused predominantly by supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) remain a significant side effect of ICD therapy despite medical treatment, affecting 8-40% of patients. The MADIT-RIT is a global, prospective, randomized, nonblinded, three-arm, multicenter clinical investigation to be performed in the Unites States, Europe, Canada, Israel and Japan, and will utilize approximately 90 centers with plan to enroll 1500 patients programmed to three treatment arms. The objective of the MADIT-RIT trial is to determine if dual-chamber ICD or CRT-D devices with high rate cutoff (MADIT-RIT-Arm B) and/or long delay in combination with detection enhancements (MADIT-RIT-Arm C) are associated with fewer patients experiencing inappropriate therapies than standard programming (MADIT-RIT-Arm A) during postimplant follow-up of patients with indication for primary prevention device therapy. This paper describes design and analytic plan for the MADIT-RIT trial. ©2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22816536      PMCID: PMC6932441          DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2012.00531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol        ISSN: 1082-720X            Impact factor:   1.468


  26 in total

1.  Clinical variables predicting inappropriate use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in patients with coronary heart disease or nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Dominic A M J Theuns; A Peter J Klootwijk; Maarten L Simoons; Luc J Jordaens
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-01-15       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction.

Authors:  Arthur J Moss; Wojciech Zareba; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; David J Wilber; David S Cannom; James P Daubert; Steven L Higgins; Mary W Brown; Mark L Andrews
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-03-19       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? A randomized, prospective study.

Authors:  I Deisenhofer; C Kolb; G Ndrepepa; J Schreieck; M Karch; S Schmieder; B Zrenner; C Schmitt
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2001-02

4.  Dual-chamber implantable cardioverter-defibrillator selection is associated with increased complication rates and mortality among patients enrolled in the NCDR implantable cardioverter-defibrillator registry.

Authors:  Thomas A Dewland; Cara N Pellegrini; Yongfei Wang; Gregory M Marcus; Edmund Keung; Paul D Varosy
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2011-08-30       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators.

Authors:  A J Moss; W J Hall; D S Cannom; J P Daubert; S L Higgins; H Klein; J H Levine; S Saksena; A L Waldo; D Wilber; M W Brown; M Heo
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1996-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Clinical experience with the new detection algorithms for atrial fibrillation of a defibrillator with dual chamber sensing and pacing.

Authors:  V Kühlkamp; V Dörnberger; C Mewis; R Suchalla; R F Bosch; L Seipel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  1999-07

7.  Electrocardiographically documented unnecessary, spontaneous shocks in 241 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  W Grimm; B F Flores; F E Marchlinski
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.976

8.  Are implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks a surrogate for sudden cardiac death in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy?

Authors:  Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Joseph H Levine; Ronald D Berger; James P Daubert; Stephen L Winters; Eugene Greenstein; Alaa Shalaby; Andi Schaechter; Haris Subacius; Alan Kadish
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-06       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Significance of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias in patients with implanted pacing cardioverter defibrillators.

Authors:  C Schmitt; M Montero; J Melichercik
Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 1.976

10.  Analysis of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Trial.

Authors:  Richard C Klein; Merritt H Raitt; Bruce L Wilkoff; Karen J Beckman; James Coromilas; D George Wyse; Peter L Friedman; James B Martins; Andrew E Epstein; Alfred P Hallstrom; Robert B Ledingham; Karen M Belco; H Leon Greene
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol       Date:  2003-09
View more
  7 in total

1.  [Inappropriate ICD therapies: All problems solved with MADIT-RIT?].

Authors:  Christof Kolb
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2015-04-21

Review 2.  ICD programming to reduce shocks and improve outcomes.

Authors:  Valentina Kutyifa; Wojciech Zareba; Arthur J Moss
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Impact of cardiac reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy assessed by myocardial perfusion imaging on ventricular arrhythmia.

Authors:  Kuo-Feng Chiang; Guang-Uei Hung; Shih-Chung Tsai; Chien-Ming Cheng; Yu-Cheng Chang; Wan-Yu Lin; Yu-Cheng Hsieh; Tsu-Juey Wu; Shih-Ann Chen; Jin-Long Huang; Ying-Chieh Liao; Ji Chen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Rationale and design of the HINODE study: Heart failure indication and sudden cardiac death prevention trial Japan.

Authors:  Hiro Yamasaki; Kenji Ando; Takanori Ikeda; Takeshi Mitsuhashi; Toyoaki Murohara; Nobuhiro Nishii; Akihiko Nogami; Yasushi Sakata; Wataru Shimizu; Torri Simon; Caroline Beaudoint; Torsten Kayser; Valentina Kutyifa; Kazutaka Aonuma
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-07-20

Review 5.  Multiparameter Monitoring with a Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator.

Authors:  Ursula Rohrer; Martin Manninger; Andreas Zirlik; Daniel Scherr
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Primary results from the Japanese Heart Failure and Sudden Cardiac Death Prevention Trial (HINODE).

Authors:  Kazutaka Aonuma; Kenji Ando; Kengo Kusano; Toru Asai; Koichi Inoue; Yukihiro Inamura; Takanori Ikeda; Takeshi Mitsuhashi; Toyoaki Murohara; Nobuhiro Nishii; Akihiko Nogami; Wataru Shimizu; Caroline Beaudoint; Torri Simon; Torsten Kayser; Hussin Azlan; Ngarmukos Tachapong; Joseph Yat-Sun Chan; Valentina Kutyifa; Yasushi Sakata
Journal:  ESC Heart Fail       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 7.  Handling of Ventricular Fibrillation in the Emergency Setting.

Authors:  Zoltán Szabó; Dóra Ujvárosy; Tamás Ötvös; Veronika Sebestyén; Péter P Nánási
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.810

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.