Literature DB >> 22809745

The effect of duration and amplitude of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Michèle Vaillant1, Tiffany Edgecombe, Cynthia R Long, Joel G Pickar, Gregory N Kawchuk.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) force magnitude and force duration on the spinal stiffness of a feline preparation. A mechanical device performed simulated SMTs at the L6 spinous process in 22 anesthetised felines. Animals were divided into four groups. Two groups (no preload, preload) received SMT having maximal displacements of 1.0 mm, 2.0 mm and 3.0 mm of total displacement (displacement control). In two other groups (preload, no preload), SMTs were applied with maximal loads of 25%, 55% and 85% body weight (force control). Each of the SMTs were applied in order of increasing displacement or force amplitudes, at increasing durations ranging from 25 to 250 ms. Spinal stiffness was quantified by applying an indentation load to external surface of the back. Linear mixed effects models were fit for post-SMT stiffness variables. When SMT was applied under displacement control with and without a preceding preload, a significant interactive effect occurred between force magnitude and force duration (p ≤ 0.05) for some of the stiffness variables. The findings from this experiment demonstrate that spinal stiffness in a feline model was affected by the interaction of the force amplitude and force duration parameters but the exact nature of this interaction remains unclear. This study provides guidance for further investigation given other SMT parameters not tested here may facilitate the ability of SMT to alter spinal stiffness.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22809745      PMCID: PMC3477278          DOI: 10.1016/j.math.2012.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Man Ther        ISSN: 1356-689X


  34 in total

1.  Objective manual assessment of lumbar posteroanterior stiffness is now possible.

Authors:  Adit Chiradejnant; Christopher G Maher; Jane Latimer
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 1.437

Review 2.  Neurophysiological effects of spinal manipulation.

Authors:  Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Biomechanics of spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  J J Triano
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.166

4.  The effects of thoracic manipulation on posteroanterior spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Brad D Campbell; Suzanne J Snodgrass
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.751

5.  Learning spinal manipulation: a comparison of two teaching models.

Authors:  Marie-Pierre Harvey; Shari Wynd; Lance Richardson; Claude Dugas; Martin Descarreaux
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2011

6.  A new technique of tissue stiffness (compliance) assessment: its reliability, accuracy and comparison with an existing method.

Authors:  G Kawchuk; W Herzog
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  Loads transmitted during lumbosacral spinal manipulative therapy.

Authors:  J Triano; A B Schultz
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Preliminary investigation of the mechanisms underlying the effects of manipulation: exploration of a multivariate model including spinal stiffness, multifidus recruitment, and clinical findings.

Authors:  Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Gregory N Kawchuk; Deydre S Teyhen; Jeffrey J Hebert; John D Childs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Comparison of the effectiveness of three manual physical therapy techniques in a subgroup of patients with low back pain who satisfy a clinical prediction rule: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Joshua A Cleland; Julie M Fritz; Kornelia Kulig; Todd E Davenport; Sarah Eberhart; Jake Magel; John D Childs
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2009-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Biomechanical characterization (fingerprinting) of five novel methods of cervical spine manipulation.

Authors:  G N Kawchuk; W Herzog
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  1993 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.437

View more
  14 in total

1.  Neural responses to the mechanical characteristics of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation: Effect of specific contact site.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2015-03-27

2.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust magnitude on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Joel G Pickar; Randall S Sozio; Cynthia R Long
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 1.437

3.  Neural responses to the mechanical parameters of a high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation: effect of preload parameters.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 1.437

4.  Decreased spontaneous activity and altered evoked nociceptive response of rat thalamic submedius neurons to lumbar vertebra thrust.

Authors:  William R Reed; Jamie T Cranston; Stephen M Onifer; Joshua W Little; Randall S Sozio
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of thrust amplitude and duration of high-velocity, low-amplitude spinal manipulation on lumbar muscle spindle responses to vertebral position and movement.

Authors:  Dong-Yuan Cao; William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.437

6.  Effects of unilateral facet fixation and facetectomy on muscle spindle responsiveness during simulated spinal manipulation in an animal model.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 1.437

7.  The effect of application site of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) on spinal stiffness.

Authors:  Tiffany L Edgecombe; Greg N Kawchuk; Cynthia R Long; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 4.166

8.  Effect of spinal manipulation thrust duration on trunk mechanical activation thresholds of nociceptive-specific lateral thalamic neurons.

Authors:  William R Reed; Randall Sozio; Joel G Pickar; Stephen M Onifer
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 1.437

9.  Neural Responses to Physical Characteristics of a High-velocity, Low-amplitude Spinal Manipulation: Effect of Thrust Direction.

Authors:  William R Reed; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Randall S Sozio; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.241

10.  Relationship between Biomechanical Characteristics of Spinal Manipulation and Neural Responses in an Animal Model: Effect of Linear Control of Thrust Displacement versus Force, Thrust Amplitude, Thrust Duration, and Thrust Rate.

Authors:  William R Reed; Dong-Yuan Cao; Cynthia R Long; Gregory N Kawchuk; Joel G Pickar
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-01-20       Impact factor: 2.629

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.