Literature DB >> 11743285

Preoperative serum prostate specific antigen levels between 2 and 22 ng./ml. correlate poorly with post-radical prostatectomy cancer morphology: prostate specific antigen cure rates appear constant between 2 and 9 ng./ml.

Thomas A Stamey1, Iain M Johnstone, John E McNeal, Arthur Y Lu, Cheryl M Yemoto.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is widely used as a guide to initiate prostatic biopsies and to follow men older than 50 years old with and without prostate cancer. However, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common cause of serum PSA values between 2 and 10 ng./ml. A better understanding of the relationships among serum PSA, prostate cancer and BPH is important.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 875 men underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution between December 1984 and January 1997. Of these men 784 had a serum PSA of 2 to 22 ng./ml., including 579 with the largest cancer located in the peripheral zone of the prostate. Of the 579 men 406 had serum PSA followups for greater than 3 years after radical prostatectomy. We examined Pearson correlations (R2) between preoperative serum PSA, and the volume of Gleason grades 4/5 and 3 to 1 cancer in 784 men, separating peripheral zone from transition zone cancers. We used broken line regression with break points of 7 and 9 ng./ml. preoperative PSA to summarize the relationship of each PSA doubling to 5 different morphological variables in 579 men with peripheral zone cancer. A 9 ng./ml. break point was used for prostate weight. Trend summaries with a local regression line for the relationships between 6 morphological variables and PSA were superimposed on full scatterplots of the 579 men with PSA less than 22 ng./ml. Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine 5-year PSA failure-free probabilities based on 406 men with minimal PSA followups greater than 3 years at break points of 7 to 9 ng./ml. PSA.
RESULTS: Pearson correlation between cancer volume and preoperative serum PSA in 875 men was weak (r2 = 0.27) and driven by large cancers with serum PSA greater than 22 ng./ml. For peripheral zone cancer the overall R2 x 100 for 641 men with low and high grade cancer was 10% and only 3% for low grade cancer, that is almost no PSA produced by these peripheral zone cancers enters the serum. All morphological variables changed at rates of doubtful medical significance below a PSA of 7 to 9 ng./ml. but at rates that were significantly worse above 9 ng./ml. R2 for these relationships was never greater than 15%. Large individual morphological variations at all levels of PSA emphasize the serious limitation of PSA as a predictor of prostate cancer morphology. Below 9 ng./ml. prostate weight increased by 21% for each doubling of PSA but above 9 ng./ml. the increase was only 4.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative serum PSA has a clinically useless relationship with cancer volume and grade in radical prostatectomy specimens, and a limited relationship with PSA cure rates at preoperative serum PSA levels of 2 to 9 ng./ml. Trend summaries for prostate weight on broken line regression showed that below 9 ng./ml. BPH is a strong contender for the cause of PSA elevation, constituting the primary cause of the over diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11743285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  36 in total

1.  The absence of voiding symptoms in men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of ≥3.0 ng/mL is an independent risk factor for prostate cancer: results from the Gothenburg Randomized Screening Trial.

Authors:  Maria Frånlund; Sigrid Carlsson; Johan Stranne; Gunnar Aus; Jonas Hugosson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2012-04-30       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Risk assessment for biochemical recurrence prior to radical prostatectomy: significant enhancement contributed by human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) and free prostate specific antigen (PSA) in men with moderate PSA-elevation in serum.

Authors:  Thomas Steuber; Andrew J Vickers; Alexander Haese; Charlotte Becker; Kim Pettersson; Felix K-H Chun; Michael W Kattan; James A Eastham; Peter T Scardino; Hartwig Huland; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 7.396

3.  Best of the 2005 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights from the 2005 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, May 21-May 26, 2005, San Antonio, TX.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2005

4.  Best of the 2004 AUA Annual Meeting: Highlights from the 2004 Annual Meeting of the American Urological Association, May 8-13, 2004, San Francisco, CA.

Authors: 
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

5.  [Establishing a protein signature from prostate tissue biopsies].

Authors:  U Zimmermann; R Ummanni; H Junker; S Venz; S Teller; J Giebel; R Walther
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  What are the factors associated with short prostate specific antigen doubling time after radical prostatectomy? A report from the SEARCH database group.

Authors:  Anna E Teeter; Lionel L Bañez; Joseph C Presti; William J Aronson; Martha K Terris; Christopher J Kane; Christopher L Amling; Stephen J Freedland
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Impact of total PSA, PSA doubling time and PSA velocity on detection rates of 11C-Choline positron emission tomography in recurrent prostate cancer.

Authors:  Maxim Rybalov; Anthonius J Breeuwsma; Anna M Leliveld; Jan Pruim; Rudi A Dierckx; Igle J de Jong
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timothy J Wilt; Michael K Brawer; Karen M Jones; Michael J Barry; William J Aronson; Steven Fox; Jeffrey R Gingrich; John T Wei; Patricia Gilhooly; B Mayer Grob; Imad Nsouli; Padmini Iyer; Ruben Cartagena; Glenn Snider; Claus Roehrborn; Roohollah Sharifi; William Blank; Parikshit Pandya; Gerald L Andriole; Daniel Culkin; Thomas Wheeler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-19       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Prostate specific antigen versus prostate specific antigen density as a prognosticator of pathological characteristics and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ahmed Magheli; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Bruce J Trock; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Alan W Partin; Misop Han; Mark L Gonzalgo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Screening for prostate cancer: an update.

Authors:  Shahrokh F Shariat; Peter T Scardino; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.344

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.