Literature DB >> 22807971

Potential genotype-specific single nucleotide polymorphism interaction of common variation in p53 and its negative regulator mdm2 in cholangiocarcinoma susceptibility.

Vincent Zimmer1, Aksana Höblinger, Florentina Mihalache, Gunter Assmann, Monica Acalovschi, Frank Lammert.   

Abstract

Aberrant cell cycle control and apoptosis deregulation are involved in biliary carcinogenesis. The tumor suppressor gene p53 and its key negative regulator murine double minute 2 (mdm2) cooperate in modulating these basic cell functions and germline p53 alteration promotes cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) formation in animal models. The potential association between common functional genetic variation in p53 (SNP72 G/C) and mdm2 (SNP309 T/G) and susceptibility to bile duct cancer, however, has not been studied. p53/SNP72 G/C (rs1042522) and mdm2/SNP309 T/G (rs2279744) were genotyped in 182 Caucasian CCA patients and 350 controls using TaqMan assays. Allelic and genotypic differences, including exploratory data analyses (according to gender, tumor localization, early onset and genotypic interactions) were compared in contingency tables using the χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests. The overall comparison of allele and genotype frequencies yielded no significant association between either SNP and CCA susceptibility. Similarly, gender- and localization-specific analyses did not reveal deviations in allelic or genotypic distributions. In carriers of the low-apoptotic p53 genotype CC, the mdm2 SNP309 T allele conferred borderline significant CCA risk [P=0.049; odds ratio (OR), 4.36; 95% CI, 0.92-20.77]. Power analysis confirmed adequate statistical power to exclude major SNP effects (each >97% for OR 1.7). Collectively, the results we obtained from the largest European CCA cohort do not support the hypothesis of a prominent role of common p53 and mdm2 variation in the genetic susceptibility to bile duct cancer. However, epistatic effects may modulate genetic CCA risk in individual subsets.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22807971      PMCID: PMC3398355          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2012.680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


  34 in total

Review 1.  Immunity, inflammation, and cancer.

Authors:  Sergei I Grivennikov; Florian R Greten; Michael Karin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Two polymorphic variants of wild-type p53 differ biochemically and biologically.

Authors:  M Thomas; A Kalita; S Labrecque; D Pim; L Banks; G Matlashewski
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Is heterozygous alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency type PIZ a risk factor for primary liver carcinoma?

Authors:  H Zhou; M E Ortiz-Pallardó; Y Ko; H P Fischer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer.

Authors:  Juan Valle; Harpreet Wasan; Daniel H Palmer; David Cunningham; Alan Anthoney; Anthony Maraveyas; Srinivasan Madhusudan; Tim Iveson; Sharon Hughes; Stephen P Pereira; Michael Roughton; John Bridgewater
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Mutations of p53 tumor suppressor gene, apoptosis, and proliferation in intrahepatic cholangiocellular carcinoma of the liver.

Authors:  A Tannapfel; L Weinans; F Geissler; A Schütz; A Katalinic; F Köckerling; J Hauss; C Wittekind
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Heterozygosity for the alpha1-antitrypsin Z allele may confer genetic risk of cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  F Mihalache; A Höblinger; F Grünhage; M Krawczyk; B C Gärtner; M Acalovschi; T Sauerbruch; F Lammert; V Zimmer
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 8.171

7.  MDM2 SNP309 accelerates tumor formation in a gender-specific and hormone-dependent manner.

Authors:  Gareth L Bond; Kim M Hirshfield; Tomas Kirchhoff; Gabriella Alexe; Elisabeth E Bond; Harlan Robins; Frank Bartel; Helge Taubert; Peter Wuerl; William Hait; Deborah Toppmeyer; Kenneth Offit; Arnold J Levine
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  Dangerous habits of a security guard: the two faces of p53 as a drug target.

Authors:  Andrei V Gudkov; Elena A Komarova
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Risk factors for intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States: a population-based case-control study.

Authors:  Tania M Welzel; Barry I Graubard; Hashem B El-Serag; Yasser H Shaib; Ann W Hsing; Jessica A Davila; Katherine A McGlynn
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-08-06       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  p53 polymorphisms: cancer implications.

Authors:  Catherine Whibley; Paul D P Pharoah; Monica Hollstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 60.716

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Primary Liver Cancers, Part 2: Progression Pathways and Carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Kun Jiang; Barbara A Centeno
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.302

2.  YY1 activates EMI2 and promotes the progression of cholangiocarcinoma through the PI3K/Akt signaling axis.

Authors:  Shuai Zhou; Kang Lin Qu; Jin Ang Li; Shi Lei Chen; Yi Gang Zhang; Chao Zhu; Hao Jin; Yong Wang; Qing Pang; Hui Chun Liu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 5.722

3.  Rapid detection of SNP (c.309T>G) in the MDM2 gene by the Duplex SmartAmp method.

Authors:  Yasuaki Enokida; Kimihiro Shimizu; Jun Atsumi; Alexander Lezhava; Yuki Tanaka; Yasumasa Kimura; Takahiro Soma; Takeshi Hanami; Yuki Kawai; Kengo Usui; Yasuko Okano; Seiichi Kakegawa; Hiroomi Ogawa; Yohei Miyamae; Yohei Miyagi; Haruhiko Nakayama; Toshihisa Ishikawa; Yoshihide Hayashizaki; Izumi Takeyoshi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.